Some essential geological and geochemical issues about shale gas research in China
Received date: 2020-05-10
Revised date: 2020-05-21
Online published: 2020-06-17
Recently, shale gas research and industrial production in China have been greatly developed, which has enriched the theory of natural gas geology in China and increased the supply of domestic natural gas production. In the future, shale gas will obtain great achievements among the developments of natural gas industry in China. The following four geological and geochemical issues about the exploration and research of shale gas has great
(1) China has to break through the single economic shale gas formation. The United States found at least 30 sets of economic shale gas formations in 29 basins. To date, only one basin in China (Sichuan Basin) has found one set of economic shale gas formation (Wufeng-Longmaxi formations). (2) Interval R O value of the economic shale gas formations and segment R O value of the gas fields. The interval R O values are 3.31% for the economic shale gas formation in China and 4.1% for that in USA; the segment R O values are 2.34% for the gas fields in China and 3.5% for that in USA. The former values are small and the latter values are big. A number of shale gas fields derived from sapropelic sources in the United States were found in the oil generation window with R O of 1.0%-1.3%. So shale gas exploration in China also needs to pay attention to this stage. At the same time, attentions should be paid to the exploration of shale gas derived from humic sources. (3) The continuous high-yield period of gas field. The world's first commercially developed shale gas field (Barnett) shows a high-yield forecast of 100×108 m3 per year of about 20 years.Development of shale gas field in China is still in the construction stage. (4) The role of fracture in shale gas preservation and development. The fault has dual effect on the enrichment of shale gas. In the United States, tectonic in the shale gas basin is stable and faults are few, while in China structures in the shale gas basin are active and faults are developed. Therefore, faults have more harm than good to the shale gas in China, which caused the fragmentation of the continuously distributed Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, limiting the area of gas field.
Jin-xing DAI , Da-zhong DONG , Yun-yan NI , Feng HONG , Su-rong ZHANG , Yan-ling ZHANG , Lin DING . Some essential geological and geochemical issues about shale gas research in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020 , 31(6) : 745 -760 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.05.016
1 |
U.S. Energy information Administration. U.S. Crude oil and natural gas proved reserves, Year-end 2018[E/OL](2019-11-28)
|
2 |
孙赞东,贾承造,李相方,等. 非常规油气勘探与开发(上、下册)[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011:69-75,865-871,876-888,1103-1108.
|
3 |
金之钧,白振瑞,高波,等. 中国迎来页岩油气革命了吗?[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(3): 451-458.
|
4 |
马永生,蔡勋育,赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 561-574.
|
5 |
|
6 |
张君峰,许浩,周志,等. 鄂西宜昌地区页岩气成藏地质特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 887-889.
|
7 |
EIA. Shale gas and oil plays, North America[EB/OL]. 2020-03-24.)
|
8 |
黎茂稳,马晓潇,蒋启贵,等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019,26(1):13-28.
|
9 |
EIA. U.S.Energy information Administration. U.S. Crude oil and natural gas proved reserves, Year-end 2016[EB/OL].(2018-05-16)
|
10 |
|
11 |
李国玉,金之钧. 新编世界含油气盆地图集(下册)[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2005:599-641.
|
12 |
胡曦. 渝东地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩地质特征研究[D].成都:西南石油大学, 2016.
|
13 |
王晔,邱楠生,仰云峰,等. 四川盆地五峰-龙马溪组页岩成熟度研究[J]. 地球科学, 2019,44(3):953-971.
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
程克明, 王铁冠, 钟宁宁, 等. 煤成烃地球化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1995: 105-108.
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
邱振,邹才能. 非常规油气沉积学:内涵与展望[J]. 沉积学报,2020,38(1):1-29.
|
23 |
邱振, 邹才能, 王红岩, 等. 中国南方五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气差异富集特征与控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(2): 163-175.
|
24 |
戴金星, 倪云燕, 黄士鹏, 等. 煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(1): 1-22.
|
25 |
戴金星. 煤成气及鉴别理论研究进展[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(14): 1291-1305.
|
26 |
戴金星, 陈践发, 钟宁宁, 等. 中国大气田及其气源[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003: 73-93.
|
27 |
康竹林,傅诚德,崔淑芬,等. 中国大中型气田概论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000.
|
28 |
邹才能,董大忠,王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016,43(2): 166-178.
|
29 |
付金华. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油勘探理论与技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2018: 165-166.
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
郭旭升,胡东风,刘若冰,等. 四川盆地二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(10): 11-18.
|
34 |
邹才能. 非常规油气地质学[M].北京:地质出版社, 2013:159-161.
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
U.S. Energy Information Administration. Drilling Productivity Report [EB/OL]. (2020-02-23) [2020-02-28].
|
40 |
U.S. Energy Information Administration.Technology drives natural gas production growth from shale gas formations[EB/OL]. (2011-06)[2020-02-28].
|
41 |
|
42 |
李建忠,李登华,董大忠,等. 中美页岩气成藏条件、分布特征差异研究与启示[J]. 中国工程科学, 2012,14(6): 56-63.
|
43 |
李昌伟,陶士振,董大忠,等. 国内外页岩气形成条件对比与有利区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015,26(5): 986-1000.
|
44 |
吕延防,万军,沙子萱,等.被断裂破坏的盖层封闭能力评价方法及其应用[J].地质科学,2008,43(1):162-174.
|
45 |
翟刚毅,王玉芳,包书景,等. 我国南方海相页岩气富集高产主控因素及前景预测[J]. 地球科学, 2017,42(7): 1057-1066.
|
46 |
庞河清,熊亮,魏力民,等. 川南深层页岩气富集高产主要地质因素分析——以威荣页岩气田为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(增刊1): 78-84.
|
47 |
赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,等. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018,29(9): 1333-1344.
|
48 |
王志刚. 涪陵大型海相页岩气田成藏条件及高效勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(3): 370-382.
|
49 |
郭旭升,胡东风,魏志红,等. 涪陵页岩气田的发现与勘探认识[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(3): 24-37.
|
50 |
王红军,马锋. 全球非常规油气资源评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2017:91-167.
|
51 |
|
52 |
李波. 北美页岩气成藏机理研究[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量,2016(13):94-95.
|
53 |
Reza Rezace(澳).页岩气基础研究[M]. 董大忠,邱振,等译.北京:科学出版社,2018:320-348.
|
54 |
|
55 |
刘树根,曾祥亮,黄文明,等. 四川盆地页岩气藏和连续型—非连续型气藏基本特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,36(6): 578-592.
|
56 |
舒逸,陆永潮,包汉勇,等. 四川盆地涪陵页岩气田3 种典型页岩气保存类型[J]. 地质勘探, 2018,38(3): 31-40.
|
57 |
唐鑫. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩气成藏的构造控制[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学, 2018: 127-152.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |