Comparative study on porosity and permeability in net confining stress of three natural gases in coal series reservoirs in Guxian County,Qinshui Basin

Expand
  • 1.School of Resource and Earth Science,China University of Mining and Technology,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoirs,Xuzhou 221116,China;
    2.Shanxi Provincial Research Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,Taiyuan 030001,China

Received date: 2018-04-03

  Revised date: 2018-05-23

  Online published: 2019-08-28

Abstract

In order to reveal the characteristics of the difference in porosity and permeability of coal,shales and tight sandstones in coal series,2 coal samples,2 shale samples,and 4 sandstone samples were collected from the Guxian County,Qinshui Basin,Shanxi Province,and a comparative study of the net confining stress permeability was conducted.The results show that the porosity and permeability of three natural gases in coal series reservoirs increase exponentially with the increase of effective stress,and the ratio of porosity compressibility of coal reservoirs,shale reservoirs and sandstone reservoirs is 1∶1∶0.58,the permeability attenuation coefficient ratio is 1∶0.73∶0.78.The porosity and permeability stress damage rate of three natural gas reservoir increase with the increase of effective stress in the form of two-stage,and the effective stress is <4MPa.The porosity and permeability damage rate of three natural gases reservoir both follow the effective stress.The increase shows a rapid upward trend with an effective stress of >4MPa.With the increase of effective stress,the growing rate is gradually stable,and the stress sensitivity of coal reservoirs,shale reservoirs,and sandstone reservoirs decreases sequentially.The research results have theoretical and practical significance for the co-examination of the three natural gases in coal series.

Cite this article

Cheng Ming, Fu Xue-hai, Zhang Miao, Cheng Wei-ping, Qu Li-zhen . Comparative study on porosity and permeability in net confining stress of three natural gases in coal series reservoirs in Guxian County,Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018 , 29(8) : 1163 -1171 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2018.05.013

References

[1]Wang Tong,Wang Qingwei,Fu Xuehai.Systematic study and its significance of unconventional natural gas in coal system[J].Coal Geology and Exploration,2014,42(1):24-27.
王佟,王庆伟,傅雪海.煤系非常规天然气的系统研究及其意义[J].煤田地质与勘探,2014,42(1):24-27.
[2]Li Xiangchen,Kang Yili,Luo Pingya.Rock deformation mechanisms and its influence on poecolation ability for CBM reservoirs[J].China Mining Magazine,2009,18(3):99-102.
李相臣,康毅力,罗平亚.煤层气储层变形机理及对渗流能力的影响研究[J].中国矿业,2009,18(3):99-102.
[3]Jia Wenrui,Li Fukai.A study on some issues of development disposition of a low permeability oilfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(4):47-51.
贾文瑞,李福垲.低渗透油田开发部署中几个问题的研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):47-51.
[4]Lu Jiating,Li Wei.Experimental study on permeability sensitivity of low permeability sandstone permeability[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(3):339-341.
卢家亭,李闽.低渗砂岩渗透率应力敏感性实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(3):339-341.
[5]Wu Xiangyang,Chen Zu’an,Sun Deming,et al.An experimental study of changes of porosity of sandstones with pressure[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica,1995,38(A01):275-280.
伍向阳,陈祖安,孙德明,等.静水压力下砂岩孔隙度变化实验研究[J].地球物理学报,1995,38(A01):275-280.
[6]Wang Liqiang,Liu Huiqing,Zhen Siguang,et al.Quantitative research on stress sensitivity of low permeability reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(1):96-99,103.
王厉强,刘慧卿,甄思广,等.低渗透储层应力敏感性定量解释研究[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):96-99,103.
[7]Enever J R E,Henning A.The Relationship between Permeability and Effective Stress for Australian coal and its Implications with Respect to Coalbed Methane Exploration and Reservoir Modeling[C].Proceedings of the 1997 International Coalbed Methane Symposiu
m,1997:13-22.
[8]Liang Bing,Shi Yingshuang,Sun Weiji,et al.Reservoir forming characteristics of  “the three gases” in coal measure and the possibility of commingling in China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):167-173.
梁冰,石迎爽,孙维吉,等.中国煤系“三气”成藏特征及共采可能性[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):167-173.
[9]Zhang Shouren.Prospects for effective approaches to deep seam CBM development[J].China Coalbed Methane,2011,8(4):18-21.
张守仁.深煤层煤层气开发有效途径展望[J].中国煤层气,2011,8(4):18-21.
[10]Qin Yong,Shen Jian,Shen Yulin.Joint mining compatibility of superposed gas-bearing systems:A general geological problem for extraction of three natural gases and deep CBM in coal series[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):14-23.
秦勇,申建,沈玉林.叠置含气系统共采兼容性——煤系“三气”及深部煤层气开采中的共性地质问题[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):14-23.
[11]Yang Xiaodong,Zhang Miao,Wei Wei,et al.Comparison of pore characteristics of the “Three Gas” reservoir in the coal seams of Guxian County,Qinshui Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(3):356-365.
杨晓东,张苗,魏巍,等.沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层孔隙特征对比[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(3):356-365.
[12]Zhong Gaorun,Zhang Xiaoli,Du Jiangmin,et al.Experimental study on stress sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(3):1300-1306.
钟高润,张小莉,杜江民,等.致密砂岩储层应力敏感性实验研究[J].地球物理学进展,2016,31(3):1300-1306.
[13]Meng Zhaoping,Hou Quanlin.Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and its influencing factors[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(3):430-437.
孟召平,侯泉林.煤储层应力敏感性及影响因素的试验分析[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):430-437.
[14]Chen Shuyuan,Qin Yong,Shen Jian,et al.Experimental study on temperature sensitivity of high rank coal permeability[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(9):1845-1851.
陈术源,秦勇,申建,等.高阶煤渗透率温度应力敏感性试验研究[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(9):1845-1851.
[15]Qin Jiyu.Study on the law of permeability of low permeability sandstone reservoir under variable confining pressure[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science,2002,17(4):28-31.[JP]
秦积舜.变围压条件下低渗砂岩储层渗透率变化规律研究[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2002,17(4):28-31.

Outlines

/