Numerical Modeling of Stress Shadow Effect on Hydraulic Fracturing

Expand
  • 1.Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering,Institute of Geology and Geophysics,Chinese Academyof Sciences, Beijing 100029,China;
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

Received date: 2015-02-07

  Revised date: 2015-03-27

  Online published: 2015-10-10

Abstract

From the aspect of meso-structure heterogeneity of gas shale,the seepage- stress-damage coupling code was used to investigate the stress shadow effect during hydraulic fracturing.The experimental results show that: (1)The stress shadow effect is affected by horizontal differential stress,injection spacing,heterogeneity and fracturing sequence.It displays repel and attract mechanical behaviors,which influences the stress-umbrella area,fracture length and width.(2)With the decrease of rock heterogeneity,the stress shadow effect has weaker influence on the stress-umbrella area,area becomes smaller gradually.(3)When the horizontal differential stress is smaller,influence of injection spacing on stress shadow competes over the far-field stress;with higher horizontal differential stress,influence of far-field stress on stress shadow competes injection spacing.(4)The stress shadow effect displays dynamic variation with the evolution of hydraulic fractures.There is strong correlation between stress umbrella area and fracture length,and they obeyed power function.Through this research,it can provide certain theatrical basis for horizontal well spacing and multiple perforation spacing optimization.

Cite this article

WANG Yu,LI Xiao,WANG Jin-bo,ZHENG Bo,ZHANG Bo,ZHAO Zhi-heng . Numerical Modeling of Stress Shadow Effect on Hydraulic Fracturing[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015 , 26(10) : 1941 -1950 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.10.1941

References

[1]King G E.Thirty Years of Gas Shale Fracturing:What Have We Learned[R].Paper SPE 133456 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,Florence,Italy,2010.
[2]Sondergeld C H,Newsham K E,Comisky J,et al.PeterophysicalConsideration in Evaluating and Producing Shale Resources[R].SPE 131768,2010.
[3]Stress shadowing and microseismic Events:A numericalevolution[R].SPE 147363,2011.
[4]Warpinski N R,Teufel L W.Influence of Geologic Discontinuities on Hydraulic Fracture Propagation[R].JPT,1987:209-220.
[5]Warpinski N R,Branagan P T.Altered-stress Fracturing[R].SPE 17533,1989.
[6]Meyer B R,Bazan L W.A Discrete Fracture Network Model for Hydraulically Induced Fractures:Theory,Parametric And Case Studies[R].SPE paper 140514 presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Conference and Exhibition,Woodlands,TX,USA,1991.
[7]]Britt L K,Smith M B.Horizontal Well Completion,Stimulation Optimization,and Risk Mitigation[R].SPE 125526,2009.
[8]Cheng Y.Boundary Element Analysis of The Stress Distribution Around Multiple Fractures:Implications for the Spacing of Perforation Clusters of Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells[R]//SPE 125769 presented at the SPE Eastern Regional Meeting,Charleston,West Virginia,2009.
[9]Roussel N P,Manchanda R,Sharma M M.Implications of Fracturing Pressure Data Recorded During A Horizontal Completion on Stage Spacing Design[R].SPE 152631,2012.
[10]Germanovich L N,Astakhov D K.Fracture closure in extension and mechanical interaction of parallel joints[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2004,109(9):2208-2222.
[11]Olson J E.Multi-fracture Propagation Modeling:Applications to Hydraulic Fracturing in Shales and Tight Sands[R].42nd US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 2nd US-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium,San Francisco,2008.
[12]Olson J E.Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Joints and Veins[D].PhD dissertation,Stanford University,San Francisco,1990.
[13]Yew C H,Mear M E,Chang C C,et al.On Perforating and Fracturing of Deviated Cased Wellbores[R].SPE 26514,1993.
[14]Nolte K.Fracturing pressure analysis for nonideal behavior[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1991,42(2):210-218.
[15]Fisher M K,Heinze J R,Harris C D,et al.Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping[R].SPE 90051,2004.
[16]Morrill J C,Miskimins J L.Optimizing Hydraulic Fracture Spacing in Unconventional Shales.Society of Petroleum Engineers[R].SPE 152595,2012.
[17]Daneshy A,Au-Yeung J,Thompson T,et al.Fracture Shadowing:A Direct Method for Determining of the Reach and Propagation Pattern of Hydraulic Fractures iIn Horizontal Wells[R].Society of Petroleum Engineers.SPE 151980,2012.
[18]Li L C,Tang C A,Li G,et al.Numerical simulation of 3d hydraulic fracturing based on an improved flow-stress-damage model and a parallel fem technique[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Enginnering,2012,45(5):801-818.
[19]Tang C A,Tham L G,Lee P K K,et al.Coupled analysis of flow,stress and damage (FSD)in rock failure[J].International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2002,39(4):477-489.
[20]Wang S Y,Sun L,Au ASK,et al.2D-numerical analysis of hydraulic fracturing in heterogeneous geo-materials[J].Construction and Building Materials,2009,23(6):2196-2206.
[21]Fang Z,Harrison J P.Development of a local degradation approach to the modeling of brittle fracture in heterogeneous rocks[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences,2002,39(4):443-457.
[22]Renshaw C E,Pollard D D.Are large differential stresses required for straight fracture propagation paths[J].Journal of Structural Geology,1994,16(6):817-822.
[23]Olga Kresse,Weng X W,Hong G U,et al.Numerical modeling of hydraulic fractures interaction in complex naturally fractured formations[J].Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering,2013,46(3):555-568.

Outlines

/