Characteristics and Significance of Microscopic Pore Structure in Tight Sandstone Reservoir of the 8th Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Su6 Area of Sulige Gasfield
Received date: 2014-12-14
Revised date: 2015-02-07
Online published: 2015-10-10
Microscopic pore structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoir of the 8th member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Su6 area of Sulige Gasfield was quantitatively analyzed by means of casting thin sections,scanning electron microscope,3D X-ray computed tomography,high pressure mercury injection,constant-rate mercury penetration.The purpose was to discuss the causes of differences of microscopic pore structures,and further to screen evaluation parameter which could reflect the microscopic pore structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoir.The results are as follows.Reservoir space types include (grains and cements) dissolved pores,clay-mineral intercrystalline pores and primary remained intergranular pores.Reservoirs with different permeability have less differences in pore radius but obvious differences in throat radius.The reservoir is more tight with smaller range and greater proportion of fine pore-throat.The throat also accounted for higher proportion of effective reservoir space.The medium-to-coarse grained lithic sandstones and medium-to-coarse grained lithic quartz sandstones have higher textural maturity and primary porosity,which have experienced strong dissolution.The dissolved pores are large proportion of total pore content,and the pore-throat radius content increases significantly,which are more than 1μm in the two types of medium-to-coarse grained sandstones.The small grained (feldspar) lithic sandstones have lower textural maturity and primary porosity,which have experienced weak dissolution.The pore types in the small grained sandstones are mainly clay-mineral inter-crystalline pores,and the pore-throat radius in which is less than 0.1μm.Mainstream throat radius plays the main controlling effect on reservoir permeability,and can well reflect the microscopic pore structure,such as reservoir pore-throat distribution,effective reservoir space and heterogeneity.In conclusion,mainstream throat radius should be an important reservoir evaluation parameter for the tight sandstone reservoir.
BI Ming-wei，CHEN Shi-yue，ZHOU Zhao-hua，SHANG Lin，ZHENG Guo-qiang，ZHANG Man-lang，GAO Li-xiang . Characteristics and Significance of Microscopic Pore Structure in Tight Sandstone Reservoir of the 8th Member of Lower Shihezi Formation in the Su6 Area of Sulige Gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015 , 26(10) : 1851 -1861 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.10.1851
［1］Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospect of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-180.[邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-180.]
[2]You Yuan,Niu Xiaobing,Xin Honggang,et al.Research on micro pore structure of overseas tight oil reservoir and its influence on Ordos Basin[J].Oil Forum,2013,(1):12-18.[尤源,牛小兵,辛红刚,等.国外致密油储层微观孔隙结构研究及其对鄂尔多斯盆地的启示[J].石油科技论坛,2013,(1):12-18.]
[3]Bai Bin,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Multi-scale method of Nano(Micro)-CT study on microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone of Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):329-333.[白斌,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.利用多尺度CT成像表征致密砂岩微观孔喉结构[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):329-333.]
[4]Bai Yongqiang,Li Na,Yang Xu,et al.Analysis ans applications of microscopic pore structure characterization of oil reservoir by atomic force microscopy[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(1):45-50.[白永强,李娜,杨旭,等.基于原子力显微镜表征的含油储层微观孔隙结构分析及应用[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(1):45-50.]
[5]Nan Junxiang,Liu Boqing.Characteristics of Upper Paleozoic main clastic reservoir of Shenmu area in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):54-61.[南珺祥,刘博卿.鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区上古生界主力气层碎屑岩储层特征[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):54-61.]
[6]Chen Huanqing,Cao Chen,Liang Shuxian,et al.Research advances on reservoir pores[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):227-237.[陈欢庆,曹晨,梁淑贤,等.储层孔隙结构研究进展[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):227-237.]
[7]Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Kong Detao,et al.Pore structure of shales from high pressure mercury injection and nitrogen adsorption method[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):450-455.[杨峰,宁正福,孔德涛,等.高压压汞法和氮气吸附法分析页岩孔隙结构[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):450-455.]
[8]Lame O,Bellet D,Di Michiel M,et al.Bulk observation of metal powder sintering by X-ray synchrotron microtomography[J].Acta Materialia,2004,52(4):977-984.
[9]Tomutsa L,Radmilovic V.Focused Ion Beam Assisted Three Dimensional Rock Imaging at Submicron Scale[R].International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts held in Pau,France,Sep.21-24,2003.SCA 2003-47,2003.
[10]Tomusta L,Silin D B,Radmilovic V.Analysis of chalk petrophysical properties by means of submicron-scale pore imaging and modeling[J].SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering,2007,10(3):285-293.
[11]Attwood D.Microscopy:Nanotomography comes of age[J].Nature,2006,442(10):642-643.
[12]Sakdinawat A,Attwood D.Nanoscale X-ray imaging[J].Nature Photonics,2010,267(4):840-848.
[13]Gao Hui,Xie Wei,Yang Jianpeng,et al.Pore throat characteristics of extra-ultra low permeability sandstone reservoir based on constant-rate mercury penetration technique[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2011,33(2):206-214.[高辉,解伟,杨建鹏,等.基于恒速压汞技术的特低—超低渗砂岩储层微观孔喉结构特征[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(2):206-214.]
[14]Wen Huaguo,Zheng Rongcai,Gao Hongcan,et al.Sedimentary facies of the 8th member of lower Shihezi Formation in Su6 area,Sulige Gas Field[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2007,25(1):90-96.[文华国,郑荣才,高红灿,等．苏里格气田苏６井区下石盒子组盒８段沉积相特征[J].沉积学报,2007,25(1):90-96.]
[15]Wang Xiuping,Mou Chuanlong.Diagenesis and diagenetic facies of reservoir in He 8 section of Shihezi Formation in east Ⅱ part of Sulige Gas Field[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):678-689.[王秀平.牟传龙.苏里格气田东二区盒8段储层成岩作用与成岩相研究[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(4):678-689.]
[16]Yang Yong,Da Shipan,Xu Xiaorong.Pore structure study of P1-2s H8 reservoir in Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(4):50-52.[杨勇,达世攀,徐晓蓉.苏里格气田盒8段储层孔隙结构研究[J].天然气工业,2005,25(4):50-52.]
[17]Fan Aiping,Zhao Juan,Yang Renchao,et al.Pore structure of reservoir rocks in Shan1Ⅱ block of Sulige Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):482-487.[樊爱萍,赵娟,杨仁超,等.苏里格气田东二区山1段、盒8段储层孔隙结构特征[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):482-487.]
[18]Ran Xinquan,Li Anqi.Sulige Gas Field Development Approach[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008.[冉新权,李安琪.苏里格气田开发论[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008.]
[19]Zhong Dakang,Zhu Xiaomin,Wang Hongjun.Characteristics and formation mechanism analysis of deep buried sandstone reservoirs in China[J].Science in China:Earth sciences,2008,38(supplement 1):11-18.[钟大康,朱筱敏,王红军.中国深层优质碎屑岩储层特征与形成机理分析[J].中国科学:地球科学,2008,38(增刊Ⅰ):11-18.]
[20]Zhang Chuang,Sun Wei,Yang Jianpeng,et al.Pore and pore-throat size distributions of low permeability sandstone reservoir and their differential origin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2012,86(2):335-346.[张创,孙卫,杨建鹏,等.低渗砂岩储层孔喉的分布特征及其差异性成因[J].地质学报,2012,86(2):335-346.]
[21]Ye Liyou,Zhong Bing,Xiong Wei,et al.An intergrated evaluation method of Xujiahe low-permeability sandstone gas reservoirs in Middle Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(11):43-46.[叶礼友,钟兵,熊伟,等.川中地区须家河组低渗透砂岩气藏储层综合评价方法[J].天然气工业,2012,32(11):43-46.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备 62010202000678号