Application of the Geochemical Exploration Technique in Searching for Subtle Oil and Gas Reservoirs
Received date: 2008-07-21
Revised date: 2009-04-08
Online published: 2009-10-10
To get a right knowledge of the effectiveness of the geochemical exploration technique in searching for subtle reservoirs and to summarize the successful exploration cases of such reservoir types are essential for the exploration of subtle oil and gas reservoirs at present. A subtle fault block oil reservoir in the Linnan area, Bohai Bay basin was chosen as an example, and the characteristics of the geochemical fields of both the acid\|extraction methane and the heavier hydrocarbons were studied and characterized in detail by using the intensive geochemical exploration technique. The results show that both the acid-extraction methane and the heavier hydrocarbons have stable geochemical field in the study area; and the geochemical fields of the two kinds of acid-extraction hydrocarbon indicators coincide very well, both effectively indicating the underground subtle fault block oil reservoir with stable ring\|like anomaly patterns. The results also show that there are causal relationship between the hydrocarbon seepage (both the microseepage and the macroseepage along Xiakou fault) from this subtle oil reservoir and the anomaly of the two acid-extraction hydrocarbon indicators. The other exploration cases from Odors basin and Junggar basin demonstrate that the fundamental base for the geochemical technique to be used effectively in exploring the subtle fault block oil reservoir is comprehensively combining various factors together, including choice of the geochemical methods, selection and combination of the effective geochemical indicators, extraction of the integrated anomaly information, and recognition of the related petroleum geological conditions. The study results of Linnan area and the geochemical exploration cases of Ordos basin and Junggar basin indicate that the geochemical exploration technique can play important roles in the exploration for subtle oil reservoirs.
JIANG Chao, ZHANG Heng-Qi, SHANG Yu-Beng, CHEN Chan-Chun, LIU Xin-Hua . Application of the Geochemical Exploration Technique in Searching for Subtle Oil and Gas Reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009 , 20(5) : 801 -807 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2009.05.801
［1］李丕龙，庞雄奇.陆相断陷盆地油气藏形成——以济阳拗陷为例［M］.北京:石油工业出版社，2004:1-4.
［2］蔡希源.中国石化油气勘探回顾与展望［J］.石油与天然气地质，2006，27（6）:715-721.
［3］袁剑英.中国西北地区主要油气勘探领域勘探难题与技术对策 ［J］.天然气地球科学,2006，17（5）:601-605.
［4］刘崇禧.油气地球化学勘查技术规范［S］.北京:中国标准出版社,1997:1-2.
［5］陈银节，缪九军，张宗元.三维荧光光谱的油气指示意义［J］.天然气地球科学,2005，16（1）:69-72.
［6］程同锦，朱怀平，陈浙春.孔雀1井剖面地球化学特征与烃类的垂向运移［J］.天然气地球科学,2006，17（1）:148-152.
［7］蒋涛，吴瑞金，程同锦,等.化探技术在我国西部油气勘探中的应用探讨［J］.天然气地球科学,2007，16（1）:117-120.
［8］吴向华，程同锦，邓天龙.油气化探分析检测技术现状及发展趋势［J］.天然气地球科学,2005，16（1）:78-81.
［9］蒋涛，仵永强，汤玉平，等.地球化学烃场效应及影响化探异常的因素［J］.天然气地球科学,2008，19（2）: 280-285.
［10］索孝东，石东阳.油气地球化学勘探技术发展现状与方向［J］.天然气地球科学,2008，19（2）: 286-292.
［11］刘崇禧，赵克斌，余刘应,等.中国油气化探40年［M］.北京：地质出版社，2001:151-166.
［12］刘朝露，夏斌．济阳坳陷中生代原型盆地的初步恢复及其主控因素［J］.天然气地球科学,2006，17(1)：60-63．
［13］倪金龙，夏斌．济阳坳陷坡折带组合类型及石油地质意义［J］.天然气地球科学,2006，17(1)：64-68．
［14］蔡佑星.济阳坳陷断裂发育特征及其对油气成藏的控制作用［J］.天然气地球科学,2008，19(1)：56-61.
［15］付金华，刘玉亮，刘金，等.临南地区断层输导体系与油气成藏模式［J］.油气地质与采收率，2002，3（6）:55-58.
［16］高先志，杜玉民，张宝收.夏口断层封闭性及对油气成藏的控制作用模式［J］.石油勘探与开发，2003， 30（3）:76-78.
［17］陆明德，田时芸.石油天然气数学地质［M］.武汉:中国地质大学出版社，1991:76-78.
［18］蒋涛，陈银节，赵克斌，等.已知油气藏上方油气化探指标的有效性分析［J］.石油实验地质, 2008，30（2）:207-211.
［19］林玉祥，朱雷，叶秋焱.利用地表化探详查方法确定断块油藏边界［J］.石油大学学报, 1997，21（1）：11-17.
［20］李丕龙.陆相断陷盆地油气地质与勘探［M］.卷一，陆相断陷盆地构造演化与构造样式，北京:石油工业出版社，2003:97-99.
［21］Saunders D F,Burson K R,Thompson C K.Model for hydrocarbon microseepage and related near-surface［J］.AAPG Bu11etin,1999,83:170-185.
［22］李广之，胡斌，邓天龙.不同赋存状态轻烃的分析技术及石油地质意义［J］.天然气地球科学,2007，18(1)：111-116.
［23］汤玉平.熵值估计在油气化探异常评价中的应用［J］.物探与化探，1998，22（4）：283-320.
［24］石昕，张立平，何登发.准噶尔盆地西北缘油气成藏模式分析［J］.天然气地球科学,2005，16(4)：460-463.
［25］胡宗全.准噶尔盆地西北缘准噶尔某地区油气成藏模式［J］.断块油气田,2004,11（1）：12-15.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备 62010202000678号