Application Research of Different Sampling Styles in Sample Collection by Soil Adsoption Wire Method

Expand
  • 1.Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Production,SINOPEC, Wuxi 214151, China;2. Geologging Branch Company, Greatwall DrillingProject Company, PetroChina, Panjin 124010, China

Received date: 2008-11-04

  Revised date: 2009-01-16

  Online published: 2009-06-10

Abstract

Soil adsoption wire method consists of two sampling styles, field wire insertion sampling (from intact fresh soil) and indoor wire insertion sampling (from preliminarily processed soil). An experimental research of this two sampling styles has been conducted in Linnan area, Bohai Bay Basin to investigate the effects of different sampling styles. The results show that different sample styles have different influences on the adsorption hydrocarbon indicators, although the anomaly distribution characteristics of a number of effective indicators such as C2-8, C9-19, and total hydrocarbons have not been influenced by the sampling styles. A field study of wire insertion sampling in Junggar Basin indicates that the indicators C4-5 can well reflect the subsurface oil and gas reservoir of Well Chaican 1. And an indoor wire\|insertion sampling study in Well Yingnan 2, Tarim Basin shows that the surface anomaly distribution characteristics of the geochemical indicators C2-8 and C15-19 can also well indicate the existing oil and gas reservoir in the subsurface. The wire adsorbed hydrocarbon indicators of the above three basins obtained by two sampling styles all respond truly to the underlying existing oil and gas reservoirs, indicating that the sampling style is a kind of external influencing factor of the effective wire adsorbed hydrocarbon indicators, while the geochemical characteristics of the indicators is the internal influencing factor.  And the vertical hydrocarbon microseepage from the reservoir is the direct influence factor of the effective wire adsorbed hydrocarbon indicators, which is the real cause for the effective wire adsorbed hydrocarbon indicators to respond to the underground oil and gas reservoir.

Cite this article

JIANG Chao, LIU Xin-Hua, SHANG Yu-Beng, CHENG Tong-Jin, CHEN Yin-Jie, CHEN Zhe-Chun . Application Research of Different Sampling Styles in Sample Collection by Soil Adsoption Wire Method[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2009 , 20(3) : 429 -435 . DOI: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2009.03.429

References

[1]张晓宝,徐永昌.我国不同赋存状态烃类气体的研究现状与展望[J].地球科学进展,1997,12(3):230-235.
[2] 刘崇禧.油气地球化学勘查技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1997:1-2.
[3]侯镜德,张逢玉,冯建跃.吸附丝法研究油气垂直运移理论[J].化学学报,1994,52:1194-1198.
[4]阮天健,费琪.石油与天然气地球化学勘探[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992:46-52,67-83.
[5]索孝东,石东阳.油气地球化学勘探技术发展现状与方向[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(2):286-292.
[6] 程同锦,朱怀平,陈浙春.孔雀1井剖面地球化学特征与烃类的垂向运移[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(1):148-152.
[7]陈银节,缪九军,张宗元.三维荧光光谱的油气指示意义[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(1):69-72.
[8]蒋涛,陈银节,赵克斌,等.已知油气藏上方油气化探指标的有效性分析[J].石油实验地质,2008,30(2) :207-211.
[9]蒋 涛,荣发准,陈浙春,等.民和盆地和松辽盆地化探工区顶空气指标数据特征对比和分析[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(5):760-763.
[10]赵新华,薛国华.吸附丝等化探方法的抗室内扰能力[J].物探与化探,2000,24(3):212-214.
[11]陈安定,王锡福,李剑锋,等.地面化探识别油气成因[J].石油学报,1998,19(4):8-15
[12]蒋涛,吴瑞金,程同锦,等.化探技术在我国西部油气勘探中的应用探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2007,16(1):117-120.
[13]蒋涛,仵永强,汤玉平,等.地球化学烃场效应及影响化探异常的因素[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(2):280-285.
[14]旷理雄,郭建华,王英明,等.柴窝堡凹陷达坂城次凹油气成藏条件及勘探方向[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(1):20-24.
[15]郭建军,陈践发,朱忠云,等.柴窝堡凹陷达坂城次凹上二叠统烃源岩的地球化学特征及勘探方向[J].沉积学报,2006,24(3):446-454.
[16]罗劲,童小兰.柴窝堡凹陷柴窝堡构造达1井钻探效果及其勘探意义[J].新疆石油学院学报,2004,16(3):9-12.
[17]梁生正,孔丽萍,梁永梅,等.塔里木盆地东部大型碳酸岩盐油气藏勘探方向[J].石油实验地质,2005,27(4):152-187.
[18]杨永才,常象春,张枝焕,等.英吉苏凹陷天然气地球化学特征[J].天然气工业,2006,26(8):12-15.

 

Outlines

/