Natural Gas Geoscience

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Microstructure and Simulation Experiments of Extracted Gas Capability in Different Types of Shale

WANG Jie,QIN Jian-zhong,RAO Dan,ZHENG Lun-ju,LI Guang-you
  

  1. 1.SINOPEC Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,Wuxi 214151,China;
    2.Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology,SINOPEC,Wuxi 214151,China
  • Received:2013-01-16 Revised:2013-06-12 Online:2013-08-10 Published:2013-08-10

Abstract:

Because of the previous researches on occurrences of shale gas and the influencing factors of gas-bearing property being insufficient,combined with shale microstructure characteristics,pyrolysis simulation experiments on enrichment capacity of hydrocarbon gas have been systematically carried out with different types of shale at different mature stages,under different lithostatic pressure and fluid pressure and with different geological characteristics.It indicates that the extracted gas amount in shale,being relatively large,is closely related to their thermal maturity,namely the extracted gas productivity is very large at over-mature stage.The percentage of extracted gas with siliceous shale is the highest,calcareous shale is the second,while argillaceous shale is the lowest.For the same type of shale,the percentage of extracted gas is the highest at mature stage,which is intermediate at high-mature stage and the lowest at over-mature stage.Over pressure can obviously enhance the extracted gas productivity of shale.The bigger the over pressure coefficient,the higher the productivity of extracted gas.In the case of the same thermal maturity and evolution process of shale,the extracted gas production in the normal depth of shale is obviously higher than that in uplifted shale.The greater the burial depth,the higher the extracted gas yield of shale.Siliceous and calcareous shale possess high contents of brittle mineral,with big pore and fracture.Their porosity is relatively big,so the extracted gas capability is strong.While argillaceous shale has relatively low contents of brittle mineral,mainly developing micropore during hydrocarbon generation process and there is no big fracture,resulting relatively small porosity.Therefore,the extracted gas capability is weaker than that of siliceous and calcareous shale.The residual gas yields of shale are very low,and basically it does not have industrial exploitation potential,so the amount of field desorbed and lost gas is key in shale gas content determination.The gas-bearing property of shale is jointly controlled by organic matter content and the reservoir physical property.Overpressure is the key of high production of shale gas,and shale gas enrich in dark and dark grey shale with calcareous (lime),siliceous and sandy thin layer (interlayer),developing better foliation.

Key words: Different types of shale, Pyrolysis simulation, Extracted gas, Main controlling factors for shale gas, Microstructure

CLC Number: 

  • TE132.2

[1]Zhang Jinchuan,Jin Zhijun,Yuan Mingsheng.Distribution and reservoir formation mechanism of shale gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(7):15-18.[张金川,金之钧,袁明生.页岩气成藏机理和分布[J].天然气工业,2004,24(7):15-18.]

[2]]Zhang Jinchuan,Xu Bo,Nie Haikuan,et al.Exploration potential of shale gas in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(6):136-140.[张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等.中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-140.][ZK)]

[3]Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.

[4]Mavor M.Barnett Shale Gas-In-Place Volume Including Sorbed and Free Gas Volume[C].AAPG Southwest Section Meeting,2003.

[5]Martini A M,Walter L M,Ku T C W,et al.Microbial production and modification of gases in sedimentary basins:A geochemical case study from a Devonian shale gas play,Michigan Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2003,87(8):1355-1375.

[6]Bowker K A.Barnett Shale gas production Fort Worth Basin:Issues and discussion[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):523-533.

[7]Wang Feiyu,He Zhiyong,Meng Xiaohui,et al.Occurrence of shale gas and prediction of original gas in-place(OGIP)[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):501-510.[王飞宇,贺志勇,孟晓辉,等.页岩气赋存形式和初始原地气量(OGIP)预测技术[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):501-510.]

[8]Wang Jie,Liu Wenhui,Tenger,et al.Thermal pyrolysis of hydrocarbon generation for marine hydrocarbon sources in marine sequence of south China and stable carbon isotopes of gas products[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(4):684-691.[王杰,刘文汇,腾格尔,等.南方海相层系不同类型烃源(岩)生烃模拟实验及其产物同位素演化规律[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(4):684-691.]

[9]Zhang Meizhen,Li Zhiming,Qin Jianzhong,et al.Assessment of the thermal maturity of the effective hydrocarbon source rocks in Dongying Depression[J].Journal of Xi′an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition,2008,23(3):12-16.[张美珍,李志明,秦建中,等.东营凹陷有效烃源岩成熟度评价[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,23(3):12-16.]

[10]Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchuan.Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment,2011,33(3):219-225.[聂海宽,张金川.页岩气储层类型和特征研究——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J].石油实验地质,2011,33(3):219-225.]

[11]Zhang Xuefen,Lu Xiancai,Zhang Linye,et al.Occurances of shale gas and their petroleum geological significance[J].Advances in Earth Science,2010,25(6):597-604.[张雪芬,陆现彩,张林晔,等.页岩气的赋存形式研究及其石油地质意义[J].地球科学进展,2010,25(6):597-604.]

[1] Zheng Jian-feng,Chen Yong-quan,Ni Xin-feng,Yan Wei,Huang Li-li,Zhang Yan-qiu. Microstructure characterization based on CT imaging technologyof Cambrian dolomite reservoir in Tarim Basin [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(5): 780-789.
[2] Guan Quan-zhong,Dong Da-zhong,Wang Shu-fang,Huang Jin-liang,Wang Yu-man,Zhang Chen-chen. Analyses on differences of microstructure between marineand lacustrine facies shale reservoirs [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(3): 524-531.
[3] He Jin-gang,Kang Yi-li,You Lijun,Du Xin-long,Cheng Qiu-ju. Effects of Mineral Composition and Microstructure on Stress-sensitivity of Mudrocks [J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(1): 129-134.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!