天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    

国内外页岩气形成条件对比与有利区优选

李昌伟,陶士振,董大忠,管全中   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-23 修回日期:2014-10-31 出版日期:2015-05-10 发布日期:2015-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 陶士振(1966-),男,安徽颍上人,教授级高级工程师,硕士生导师,主要从事油气成藏机理与分布评价研究.E-mail:tsz@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 作者简介:李昌伟(1989-),男,山东潍坊人,硕士研究生,主要从事页岩气成藏、碳酸盐岩岩性—地层油气藏成藏机理研究.E-mail:rockleea@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律,关键技术及目标评价”(编号:2011ZX05001)资助.

Comparison of the Formation Condition of Shale Gas between Domestic and Abroad and Favorable Areas Evaluation

LI Chang-wei,TAO Shi-zhen,DONG Da-zhong,GUAN Quan-zhong   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2014-08-23 Revised:2014-10-31 Online:2015-05-10 Published:2015-05-10

摘要:

为了优选国内有利勘探区及层系,通过对美国、中国各个盆地富有机质页岩最新资料调研,将我国发育的富有机质页岩与美国现今技术可采储量居前的五大类页岩从区域构造背景、有机碳含量、储层物性、含气量等11个方面进行了对比分析。结果显示:①中国海相页岩有机质丰度、类型与美国海相页岩相当,皆以Ⅰ型或者Ⅱ1型为主,有机质成熟度要比美国页岩高,表明烃源岩可以并已经产生足够数量的烃类气体;陆相泥页岩TOC值低于北美地区页岩TOC值,有机质类型大都属于Ⅱ2型或者Ⅲ型,成熟度介于2%~4.5%之间且变化范围较大,生成页岩气潜力不如海相页岩好。②中国海相页岩脆性矿物含量比北美页岩高,黏土矿物含量相当,利于后期压裂改造|陆相页岩脆性矿物含量比北美地区低,黏土矿物含量与北美地区相当,不利于后期压裂改造。③中国海相页岩总体上孔隙度大小与北美海相页岩相当,但孔隙度分布范围比北美页岩大,孔隙类型与北美相当,显示出较好的储集性能|陆相页岩孔隙度大小要略低于北美海相页岩,孔隙类型与北美相当,储集性能较差。④中国海相页岩层埋藏深度主体分布在1 200~5 300m之间,比北美地区现今勘探的主体深度(1 300~4 000m)范围要大,并且由于构造演化复杂而与美国相对稳定的构造背景差异较大,导致我国页岩气保存条件变差和勘探风险增大|中新生界陆相页岩具有累计厚度大,单层厚度要小且平面展布范围小,虽然埋藏深度与北美地区相当,但由于后期构造运动破坏较大,因此对页岩气的保存十分不利。据此提出了适合我国海相页岩和陆相页岩的评价标准,并对各盆地优选出的有利地区和有利层位进行优选评价,指出海相页岩气勘探最有利的地区和层系为重庆周缘O3w—S1l、威远地区∈1q和S1l,陆相页岩气最有利地区和层系为鄂尔多斯盆地T3y、松辽盆地K1q。

关键词: 页岩气, 海相页岩, 陆相页岩, 形成条件对比, 有利区

Abstract:

In order to optimize the favorable area and strata of shale gas,we investigate the latest literature about organic-rich shale in basins of America and China.According to the comparison and analysis of the regional tectonic background,organic carbon content,sedimentary environment,organic carbon content,reservoir property,gas content and so on of the shale between North America and China,the following results have been reached:(1)Both China marine shale and America shale have similar organic matter abundance and types(typeⅠor type Ⅱ1).The thermal maturities of China′s marine shale are higher than America′s,which indicate that China′s marine shale have already generated adequate hydrocarbon;TOC(total organic carbon)of terrestrial shale is lower than that of America′s.Their organic type belongs to typeⅡ2 or type Ⅲ and maturity varies from 2% to 4.5%.Those indicate that the potential to generate hydrocarbon of terrestrial shale is lower than that of marine shale.(2)With similar content of clay mineral,China′s marine shale contains more brittle mineral,which is conductive to fracturing|In contrast,terrestrial shale contains less brittle mineral than that of America′s.(3)With similar pore types and porosity,China′s marine shale shows as good quality of reservoir as America′s.But terrestrial shale shows relatively lower porosity compared with the marine shale of America′s.(4)Burial depth of china′s marine shale distributes from 1 200m to 5 300m,which is wider than that of America′s(1 300-4 000m).Meanwhile,due to the much more complicated tectonic evolution than the stable geotectonic background of America′s shale,those factors result in poor preservation condition of China′s marine shale and terrestrial shale.Therefore we propose an evaluation criterion of shale gas that suits for the marine/terrestrial shale in China according to the result of comparison and the exploration practice.An evaluation of favorable area and strata is carried out on the base of the shale gas assessment criterion.The result shows that the optimum strata of marine shale are the O3w-S1l of Chongqing and its adjacent area,the ∈1q and S1l of Weiyuan area.And the optimum strata of continental shale are T3y of Ordos Basin and K1q of Songliao Basin.

Key words: Shale gas, Marine shale, Continental shale, Comparison of the formation conditions, Favorable areas

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2

[1]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Wang Shejiao,et al.Geological characteristics,formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2010,37(6):641-653.[邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等.中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2010,37(6):641-653.]
[2]Zou Caineng,Zhang Guosheng,Yang Zhi,et al.Geological concepts,characteristics,resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon:On unconventional petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):385-454.[邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):385-454.]
[3]Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1921-1938.
[4]Helena G D,Camron Milller,Lewis R,et al.Evaluating the impact of mineralogy on reservoir quality and completion quality of organic shale plays[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):223-250.
[5]Wang Guochang,Carr T R.Orgainc-rich Marcellus shale lithofacies modeling and distribution pattern analysis in the Applachian Basin[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(12):2173-2205.
[6]Brian J C.Woodford shale:From Hydrocarbon source rock to reservoir[C].AAPG Directorate Woodford Shale Forum.Oklahoma:Oklahoma City,April 11,2013.
[7]Cardott B J.Thermal maturity of Woodford Shale gas and oil plays,Oklahoma,USA[J].International Journal of Coal Geology,2012,103:109-119.
[8]Roger M S,Neal R.O’Brien.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Geohorizon,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[9]Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Spectrum of pores types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J].AAPG Bulletin,2012,96(6):1071-1098.
[10]John H W.The Marcellus Shale Gas Play Geology,Development and Water-Resource Impact Mitigation[R].New York:U.S.Geological Survey,2012:3-29.
[11]Wang G,Carr T R.Methology of organic-rich shale lithofacies identification and prediction:A case study from Marcellus shale in the Appalachian Basin[J].Computer & Geosciences,2012,(49):151-163.
[12]Milliken K L,Rudnicki M,Awwiler D N.et al.Organic matter-hosted pore system,Marcellus Formation(Devonian),Pennsylvania[J].AAPG Bulletin,2013,97(2):177-200.
[13]U.S.Enery Information Administration.Review of Energy Resources:U.S.Shale Gas and Shale Oil Plays[R].Washington,DC:U.S.Department of Energy,2011:6-8
[14]Maria F R,Jean N R,Sylvain B,et al.Evalution of Barnett Shale orgainc carbon structure and nanostructure with increasing maturation[J].Organic Geochemistry,2014,(71):7-16.
[15]Ursula Hammes,H.Scott Hamlin,Thomas E.Ewing.Geological analysis of the Upper Jurassic Haynesville Shale in the Texas and west Louisiana[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(10):1643-1666.
[16]Buller D,Dix M.Petrophysical evaluation of the haynesville shale in northwest Louisiana and Northeast Texas[J].Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transaction,2009,(59):127-143.
[17]Liang Xing,Ye Xi,Zhang Jiehui,et al.Reservoir forming conditions and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in the Weixin Sag,Dianqianbei Depression[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(6):693-699.[梁兴,叶熙,张介辉,等.滇黔北坳陷威信凹陷页岩气成藏条件分析与有利区优选[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(6):693-699.]
[18]Yan Deyu,Huang Wenhui,Li Ang,et al.Preliminary analysis of marine-continental transitional shale gas accumulation conditions and favorable areas in the Upper Paleozoic Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(5):1-10.[闫德宇,黄文辉,李昂,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界海陆过渡相页岩气聚集条件及有利区预测[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(5):1-10.]
[19]Liu Yan,Zhou Wen,Deng Hucheng.Geological characteristics of gas-bearing shales in the Yanchang Formation and its resource assessment in the Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(3):19-23.[刘岩,周文,邓虎成.鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组含气页岩地质特征及资源评价[J].天然气工业,2013,33(3):19-23.]
[20]Xiong Zhuang,Hu Wangshui,Wang Dan,et al.Resource assessment of shale Gas in the first member of Yingcheng Formation in Lishu Depression[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(2):78-83.[熊壮,胡望水,王丹,等.梨树断陷营一段页岩气资源评价[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(2):78-83.]
[21]Su Shicai,Chen Yang,Mu Bixin.The evaluation and favorable areas selection of shale gas in Xujiahe Formation in Sichuan Basin[C]//Ye Jianping,Fu Xiaokang,Li Wuzhong.CBM Academic Conference Proceeding.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013:495-501.[苏时才,陈杨,牟必鑫.四川盆地上三叠统须家河组页岩气资源评价与选区[C]//叶建平,傅小康,李五忠.煤层气学术研讨会论文集.北京:地质出版社,2013:495-501.]
[22]Wang Yongshi,Li Zheng,Gong Jianqiang,et al.Discussion on an evaluation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang depression:A case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):83-91.[王永诗,李政,巩建强,等.济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法——以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91.]
[23]Yang Yiting,Zhang Jinchuan,Wang Xiangzeng,et al.Source rock evaluation of continental shale gas:A case study of Chang 7 of Mesozoic Yangchang Formation in Xia Siwan area of Yanchang[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2012,36(4):10-17.[杨镱婷,张金川,王香增,等.陆相页岩气的泥页岩评价—以延长下寺湾区上三叠统延长组长7段为例[J].东北石油大学学报,2012,36(4):10-17.]
[24]Zhu Tong,Bao Shujing,Wang Feng.Pooling conditions of non-marine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its exploration and development prospect[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(9):16-21.[朱彤,包书景,王烽.四川盆地陆相页岩气形成条件及勘探开发前景[J].天然气工业,2012,32(9):16-21.]
[25]Zhang Jinchuan,Jiang Shengling,Tang Xuan et al.Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(12):109-114.[张金川,姜生玲,唐玄,等.我国页岩气富集类型及资源特点[J].天然气工业,2009,29(12):109-114.]
[26]Chen Cen,Hu Wangshui,Xiong Zhuang,et al.Reservoir Formation Conditions of Shale Gas in the First Member of Yingcheng Formation of Lishu Fault,Songliao Basin[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2013,13(21):6066-6071.[陈岑,胡望水,熊壮,等.松辽盆地梨树断陷营城组一段页岩气成藏条件分析[J].科学技术与工程,2013,13(21):6066-6071.]
[27]Dai Chunlei,Fu Xiaofei,Chen Zhe.Shale gas resource potential analysis of Qingshankou Group in northern Songliao Basin[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2012,12(17):4134-4140.[戴春雷,付晓飞,陈哲.浅析松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩气资源潜力[J].科学技术与工程,2012,12(17):4134-4140.]
[28]Zhao Jianan,Chen Yongjin,Jiang Wenbin.Shale gas reservoir evaluation and prediction of the shale gas reservoir′s favorable zone in the cretaceous Qingshankou Formation of the southern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Northeast Petroleum University,2013,37(2):26-36.[赵佳楠,陈永进,姜文斌.松辽盆地南部白垩系青山口组页岩气储层评价及生储有利区预测[J].东北石油大学学报,2013,37(2):26-36.]
[29]Liu Yuting.The Trade-off Study on Evaluation Criterion of Domestic and External Shale Gas[D].Hubei:Yangtze University,2012.[刘玉婷.中外页岩气评价标准之比较研究[D].湖北:长江大学,2012.]
[30]Long Pengyu,Zhang Jinchuan,Li Yuxi,et al.Reservoir-forming conditions and strategic select favorable area of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic of Chongqing and its adjacent areas[J].Earthe Science Frontiers,2012,19(2):221-233.[龙鹏宇,张金川,李玉喜,等.重庆及其周缘地区下古生界页岩气成藏条件及有利区预测[J].地学前缘,2012,19(2):221-233.]
[31]Wang Shejiao,Wang Lansheng,Huang Jinliang,et al.Accumulation conditions of shale gas reservoirs in Silurian of the Upper Yangtze region[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):45-50.[王社教,王兰生,黄金亮,等.上扬子区志留系页岩气成藏条件[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):45-50.]
[32]Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Li Jianzhong,et al.Reservoir characteristics of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):551-561.[王玉满,董大忠,李建忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):551-561.]
[33]Zhang Qin,Bian Ruikang,Tang Ying,et al.Geological condition and exploration prospect of shale gas in Kuqa Depression[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2010,34(6):13-31.[张琴,边瑞康,唐颖,等.库车拗陷页岩气聚集条件与勘探前景[J].大庆石油学院学报,2010,34(6):13-31.]
[34]Shan Yansheng,Zhang Jinchuan,Li Xiaoguang,et al.Shale gas accumulation Factors and prediction of favorable area of Taiyuan Formation in Liaohe Eastern Uplift[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2012,36(1):1-7.[单衍胜,张金川,李晓光,等.辽河盆地东部凸起太原组页岩气聚集条件及有利区预测[J].大庆石油学院院报,2012,36(1):1-7.]
[35]Jiu Kai,Ding Wenling,Huang Wenhui,et al.Analysis of geological condition of the formation of Shahejie shale gas in Jiyang Depression in Bohai Bay Basin[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,2012,36(2):65-80.[久凯,丁文龙,黄文辉,等.渤海湾盆地济阳拗陷沙三段页岩气地质条件分析[J].大庆石油学院院报,2012,36(2):65-80.]
[36]Sun Yukai,Li Xinning,He Renzhong,et al.Favorable targets for shale gas exploration in Tuha Basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2011,32(1):4-6.[孙玉凯,李新宁,何仁忠,等.吐哈盆地页岩气有利勘探方向[J].新疆石油地质,2011,32(1):4-6.]
[37]Huang Jinliang,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Shale gas generation and potential of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin,China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(1):69-75.[黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气形成条件及资源潜力[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(1):69-75.]
[38]Yan Cheng.The Study on Reservoir-forming Conditions of Shale Gas in Xidatan Region of The Northern Margin of The Qaidam Basin[D].Xi’an:Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2013.[闫晟.柴北缘西大滩地区页岩气成藏条件研究[D].西安:西安科技大学,2013.]
[39]Li Xinjing,Lv Zonggang,Dong Dazhong,et al.Geological controls on accumulation of shale gas in North America[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):27-32.[李新景,吕宗刚,董大忠,等.北美页岩气资源形成的地质条件[J].天然气工业,2009,29(5):27-32.]
[40]Zeng Weite,Ding Wenlong,Zhang Jinchuan,et al.Analysis of geological controls on shale gas accumulation in northwest China[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2013,32(4):139-150.[曾维特,丁文龙,张金川,等.中国西北地区页岩气形成地质条件分析[J].地质科技情报,2013,32(4):139-150.]
[41]Wang Xiangzeng,Zhang Jinchuan,Cao Jinzhou,et al.A preliminary discussion on evaluation of continental shale gas resources:A case study of Chang 7 of Mesozoic Yanchang Formation in Zhiluo-Xiasiwan area of Yanchang[J].Earth Science Frontoers,2012,19(2):192-197.[王香增,张金川,曹金舟,等.陆相页岩气资源评价初探:以延长直罗—下寺湾区中生界长7段为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(2):192-197.]
[42]Zheng Rongcai,He Long,Liang Xiwen,et al.Forming conditions of shale gas(oil)plays in the Lower Jurassic Da′anzhai member in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(12):30-40.[郑荣才,何龙,梁西文,等.川东地区下侏罗统大安寨段页岩气(油)成藏条件[J].天然气工业,2013,33(12):30-40.]
[43]Chen Gang,Xu Shuanghui,Chen Hongde,et al.Pooling geological conditions of shale gas in T3x5 of West Sichuan-North Sichuan,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology,2014,41(1):8-17.[陈刚,徐双辉,陈洪德,等.川西-川北地区T3x5 页岩气成藏地质条件[J].成都理工大学学报,2014,41(1):8-17.]
[44]Jiang Chengfu,Wang Xiangzeng,Zhang Lixia,et al.Geological characteristics of shale and exploration potential of continental shale gas in 7th  member of Yanchang Formation,southeast Ordos Basin[J].Geology in China,2013,40(6):1880-1888.[姜呈馥,王香增,张丽霞,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东南部延长组长7 段陆相页岩气地质特征及勘探潜力评价[J].中国地质,2013,40(6):1880-1888.]
[45]Luo Peng,Ji Liming.Reservoir characteristics and cotential evaluation of continental shale gas[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(5):1060-1068.[罗鹏,吉利明.陆相页岩气储层特征与潜力评价[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(5):1060-1068.]
[46]Li Juan,Yu Bingsong,Zhang Jinchuan,et al.Reservoir characteristics and their influence factors of the Lower Cambrian dark shale in northern Guizhou[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(3):364-374.[李娟,于炳松,张金川,等.黔北地区下寒武统黑色页岩储层特征及其影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(3):364-374.]
[47]Ma Chao,Ning Ning,Wang Hongyan,et al.Exploration Prospect of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale gas in Xiangxi-Qiandong area[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(1):38-41.[马超,宁宁,王红岩,等.湘西—黔东地区牛蹄塘组页岩气勘探前景[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(1):38-41.]
[48]Zeng Weite,Zhang Jinchuan,Ding Wenlong,et al.The gas Content of continental Yanchang shale and its main controlling factors:A case study of Liuping 171 well in Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):291-301.[曾维特,张金川,丁文龙,等.延长组陆相页岩含气量及其主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地柳坪171井为例[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):291-301.]
[49]Zou Caineng,Dong Dazhong,Yang Ye,et al.Forming Conditions of Chinese shale gas and its exploration practice[J].Natural Gas Industry,2011,31(12):26-39.[邹才能,董大忠,杨烨,等.中国页岩气形成条件及勘探实践[J].天然气工业,2011,31(12):26-39.]
[50]Feng Guoxiu,Chen Jisheng.Relationship between the reflectance of bitumen and vitrinite in rock[J].Natural Gas Industry,1988,8(3):20-25.[丰国秀,陈盛吉.岩石中沥青反射率与镜质体反射率之间的关系[J].天然气工业,1988,8(3):20-25.]
[51]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Geology Industry Press,2013:140-142.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2013:140-142.]
[52]Long Pengyu,Zhang Jinchuan,Tang Xuan,et al.Feature of muddy shale fissure and its effect for shale gas exploration and development[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):525-532.[龙鹏宇,张金川,唐玄,等.泥页岩裂缝发育特征及其对页岩气聚集与产出意义[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):525-532.]
[53]Julia F W,Robert M R,Holder J.Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):603-622.
[54]Passey Q R,Bohacs K M,Esch W L,et al.From Oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geological and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs,SPE 131350.
[55]Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C C,et al.Micro-Structural studies of gas shale,SPE 131771-MS.
[56]Slatt M R,Brien R O.Pore types in the Barnett and Woodford gas shales:Contribution to understanding gas storage and migration pathways in fine-grained rocks[J].AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(12):2017-2030.
[57]Chen Yiming,Wei Xiuli,Xu Huan.Suggestions from the research of pore types of shale gas reservoir in North America[J].Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs,2012,5(4):19-22.[陈一鸣,魏秀丽,徐欢.北美页岩气储层孔隙类型研究的启示[J].复杂油气藏,2012,5(4):19-22.]
[58]Fan Bojiang,Shi Liang,Pang Xiongqi.Accumulation characteristics and exploration screening of shale[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(6):9-13.[范柏江,师良,庞雄奇.页岩气成藏特点及勘探选区条件[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(6):9-13.]

[1] 赵文韬,荆铁亚,吴斌,周游,熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[2] 夏鹏,王甘露,曾凡桂,牟雨亮,张昊天,刘杰刚. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组高—过成熟页岩气富氮特征及机理探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1345-1355.
[3] 康毅力,豆联栋,游利军,陈强,程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[4] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[5] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[6] 余川,曾春林,周洵,聂海宽,余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[7] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[8] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[9] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[10] 贺领兄,宋维刚,安生婷,徐永锋,沈娟,路超,王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[11] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[12] 卢文涛,李继庆,郑爱维,梁榜,张谦,杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
[13] 鲍祥生,谈迎,吴小奇,郑红军. 利用纵横波速度法预测泥页岩脆性矿物指数[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 245-250.
[14] 梁榜,李继庆,郑爱维,卢文涛,张谦. 涪陵页岩气田水平井开发效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 289-295.
[15] 王延山, 胡英杰, 黄双泉, 康武江, 陈永成. 渤海湾盆地辽河坳陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1422-1432.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!