天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于孔隙结构控制的致密砂岩可动流体评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区上三叠统长6致密砂岩为例

吴松涛1,2,林士尧3,晁代君3,翟秀芬1,王晓瑞4,黄秀1,2,徐加乐4   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083;
    2.中国石油天然气集团公司油气储层重点实验室,北京 100083;
    3.中国石油国际勘探开发有限公司,北京 100034;
    4.中国石油大学(华东),山东 青岛 266510
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-12 修回日期:2019-06-03 出版日期:2019-08-10
  • 作者简介:吴松涛(1985-),男,山东东营人,工程师,博士,主要从事沉积储层与非常规油气地质学研究.E-mail:wust@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“重点盆地致密油资源潜力、甜点区预测与关键技术应用”(编号:2016ZX05046-006);
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目“中国陆相致密油(页岩油)形成机理与富集规律”(编号:2014CB239000);国家科技重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律、关键技术及目标评价”(编号:2017ZX05001);中国石油重大科技专项“大中型岩性地层油气藏富集规律与关键技术”(编号:2019B-03);中国石油科技重大专项“陆相中高成熟度页岩油勘探开发关键技术研究与应用”(编号:2019E-26)联合资助.

Fluid mobility evaluation based on pore structure investigation in tight sandstones:Case study of Upper Triassic Chang 6 tight sandstones in Huaqing area,Ordos Basin

Wu Song-tao1,2,Lin Shi-yao3,Chao Dai-jun3,Zhai Xiu-fen1,Wang Xiao-rui4,Huang Xiu1,2,Xu Jia-le4   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,CNPC,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir,Beijing 100083,China;
    3.China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Company Ltd.,Beijing 100034,China;
    4.China University of Petroleum,Qingdao 266510,China
  • Received:2019-02-12 Revised:2019-06-03 Online:2019-08-10

摘要: 以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长6致密砂岩为研究对象,利用QEMSCAN、光学显微镜、场发射扫描电镜、微米CT、高压压汞、核磁共振等方法对孔隙结构与可动流体进行了研究。结果表明,华庆地区长6储层发育原生粒间孔、颗粒溶蚀孔与粒间溶蚀扩大孔,以钾长石、岩屑、方解石溶蚀为主;CT三维孔喉模型指示孔喉连通性中等—好,连通孔隙体积比例与储层物性呈正相关关系。长6致密砂岩可动流体饱和度介于70%~90%之间,可动油饱和度介于40%~65%之间,与储层物性呈正相关关系。不同渗透率样品可动流体与可动油分布的优势孔喉尺寸具有差异性,当空气渗透率从大于1 ×10-3μm2到(0.1~1)×10-3μm2再到小于0.1×10-3μm2,可动流体饱和度分布的优势孔喉半径从0.1~1μm减小到0.01~0.1μm再到0.001~0.01μm,可动油饱和度分布的优势孔喉半径从1~10μm减小到0.1~1μm再到0.001~0.01μm。研究结果有助于进一步明确致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体的关系,为鄂尔多斯盆地致密油勘探开发提供参考依据。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 低渗透砂岩, 致密砂岩, 致密油, 孔隙结构, 可动流体, 可动油, 纳米孔

Abstract: Characteristics of pore structures and movable fluids of tight sandstones of the Upper Triassic Chang 6 member in Huaqing area of the Ordos Basin were analyzed based on the data from QEMSCAN,optical microscope,FE-SEM,Micro-CT,MICP and NMR.Inter-particle pores,particle-dissolution pores,and inter-particle dissolved pores were dominated in the storage space,and K-feldspar,rock fragments and calcite were the main dissolution components.CT data indicated that the connectivity of 3D pore system was medium to good,and the ratio of connected pores was positively related to physical properties.The ranges of movable fluid saturation and movable oil saturation of Chang 6 member was 70%-90% and 40%-65%,which showed positive correlations with porosity and permeability.The movable fluid saturation changed among samples with different permeability values.As the air permeability of Chang 6 member decreased from over 1×10-3μm2 to 0.1×10-3μm2 and less than 0.1×10-3μm2,the radius of storage space for movable fluid decreased from 0.1-1μm to 0.01-0.1μm and 0.001-0.01μm.Moreover,the radius of storage space for movable oil decreased from 1-10μm to 0.1-1μm and 0.001-0.01μm,respectively.The results can help to further define the relationship between pore structure and movable fluids of tight sandstones,as well as provide technical support for petroleum exploration and development in Huaqing area.

Key words: Ordos Basin, Low permeability sandstones, Tight sandstone, Tight oil, Pore structure, Movable fluid, Movable oil, Nano scale pore

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional [JP2]Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2014.
邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,2014.
[2]Cao Zhe,Liu Guangdi,Liu Zhuangxiaoxue,et al.Research status on tight oil and its prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(10):1499-1508.
曹喆,柳广弟,柳庄小雪,等.致密油地质研究现状及展望[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(10):1499-1508.
[3]Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.
[4]Li Denghua,Liu Zhuoya,Zhang Guosheng,et al.Comparison and revelation of tight oil accumulation conditions,distribution characteristics and development status between China and U.S[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(7):1126-1138.
李登华,刘卓亚,张国生,等.中美致密油成藏条件、分布特征和开发现状对比与启示[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(7):1126-1138.
[5]EIA.Drilling Productivity Report for key tight oil and shale regions[EB/OL].[2019-08].https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf.
[6]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):173-187.
邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):173-187.
[7]Zou Caineng,Yang Zhi,Zhu Rukai,et al.Geologic significance and optimization technique of sweet spots in unconventional shale systems[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2019,178:3-19.
[8]Wu Songtao,Zhu Rukai,Yang Zhi,et al.Distribution and characteristics of lacustrine tight oil reservoirs in China[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2019,178:20-36.
[9]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Li Jianzhong,et al.Geological Evaluating Methods for Tight Oil[S].PRC National Standard(GB/T 34906-2017).Beijing:China Standards Press 2017.
邹才能,朱如凯,李建忠,等.致密油地质评价方法[S].中华人民共和国国家标准(GB/T 34906-2017).北京:中国标准出版社2017.
[10]Timur A.Pulsed nuclear magnetic resonance studies of porosity,movable fluid,and permeability of sandstones[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1969,21(6):775-786.
[11]Kevin M,Douglas M,Smith A.NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure:numerical inversion of relaxation measurements[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,1987,19(1):117-126.
[12]Wang Weimin,Guo Hekun,Ye Chaohui.The evaluation of development potential in low permeability oil field by the aid of NMR movable fluid detecting technology[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2001,22(6):40-44,4-5.
王为民,郭和坤,叶朝辉.利用核磁共振可动流体评价低渗透油田开发潜力[J].石油学报,2001,22(6):40-44,4-5.
[13]Yang Hua,Li Shixiang,Liu Xianyang.Characteristics and resource prospects of tight oil and shale oil in Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):1-11.
杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11.
[14]Yao Jingli,Deng Xiuqin,Zhao Yande,et al.Characteristics of tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):150-158.
姚泾利,邓秀芹,赵彦德,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密油特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):150-158.
[15]Yang Zhi,Hou Lianhua,Lin Senhu,et al.Geologic characteristics and exploration potential of tight oil and shale oil in Lucaogou Formation in Jimsar Sag[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2018,23(4):76-85.
杨智,侯连华,林森虎,等.吉木萨尔凹陷芦草沟组致密油、页岩油地质特征与勘探潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2018,23(4):76-85.
[16]Yang Hua,Fu Jinhua,He Haiqing,et al.Formation and distribution of large low-permeability lithologic oil regions in Huaqing,Ordos Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):641-648.
杨华,付金华,何海清,等.鄂尔多斯华庆地区低渗透岩性大油区形成与分布[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):641-648.
[17]Shi Tiaotiao,Sun Wei,He Shengping.Relationship between micro-pore structure and movable fluid saturation in low permeability reservoir[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2012,31(4):81-85.
师调调,孙卫,何生平.低渗透储层微观孔隙结构与可动流体饱和度关系研究[J].地质科技情报,2012,31(4):81-85.
[18]You Yuan,Niu Xiaobing,Feng Shengbin,et al.Study of pore features in Chang7 tight oil reservoir,Yanchang layer,Ordos Basin[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,2014,38(6):18-23.
尤源,牛小兵,冯胜斌,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7致密油储层微观孔隙特征研究[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(6):18-23.
[19]Yang Zhi,Fu Jinhua,Guo Qiulin,et al.Discovery,characteristics and resource potential of continental tight oil in Triassic Yanchang Formation,Ordos Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2017,22(6):9-15.
杨智,付金华,郭秋麟,等.鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组陆相致密油发现、特征及潜力[J].中国石油勘探,2017,22(6):9-15.
[20]Wu Songtao,Zhu Rukai,Li Xun,et al.Evaluation and application of porous structure characterization technologies in unconventional tight reservoirs[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2018,25(2):191-203.
吴松涛,朱如凯,李勋,等.致密储层孔隙结构表征技术有效性评价与应用[J].地学前缘,2018,25(2):191-203.
[21]Yang Zhi,Zou Caineng.“Exploring petroleum inside source kitchen”:Connotation and prospects of source rock oil and gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2019,46(1):173-184.
[22]Wang Weimin,Ye Zhaohui,Guo Hekun.Experimental studies of NMR properties of continental sedimentary rocks[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2001,18(2):113-121.
王为民,叶朝辉,郭和坤.陆相储层岩石核磁共振物理特征的实验研究[J].波谱学杂志,2001,18(2):113-121.
[23]Wang Zhenhua,Chen Gang,Li Shuhen,et al.Application of NMR core experimental analysis in evaluation of low-porosity and low-permeability sandstone reservoirs[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):773-780.
王振华,陈刚,李书恒,等.核磁共振岩心实验分析在低孔渗储层评价中的应用[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):773-780.
[24]Yu Jian,Yang Xiao,Li Bin,et al.A method of determining movable fluid saturation of tight oil reservoirs:A case study of tight oil reservoirs in seventh member of Yanchang Formation in Heshui area[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(6):767-773.
喻建,杨孝,李斌,等.致密油储层可动流体饱和度计算方法——以合水地区长7致密油储层为例[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):767-773.
[25]Yang Junjie.Tectonic Evolution and Oil-gas Reservoirs Distribution in Ordos Basin[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2002.
杨俊杰.鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]北京:石油工业出版社,2002.
[26]He Zixin.Evolution and Oil-gas Reservoirs in Ordos Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2003.
何自新.鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气[M].北京:地质出版社,2003.
[27]Wu Songtao,Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,et al.Characteristics and origin of tight oil accumulations in the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation of the Ordos Basin,north-central China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica:English Edition,2016,90(5):1821-1837.
[28]Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,Su Ling,et al.Problems and future works of porous texture characterization of tight reservoirs in China[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2016,37(11):1-14.
朱如凯,吴松涛,苏玲,等.中国致密储层孔隙结构表征需注意的问题及未来发展方向[J].石油学报,2016,37(11):1-14.
[29]Xiao Kaihua,Feng Dongjun,Li Xiupeng.Micro-pore and throat characteristics and moveable fluid variation of tight sandstone in 4th member of Xujiahe Formation,Xinchang Gas Field,western Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36(1):77-82.
肖开华,冯动军,李秀鹏.川西新场须四段致密砂岩储层微观孔喉与可动流体变化特征[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(1):77-82.
[30]Peng Shilin,Ye Zhaohui,Liu Maili.Measurement of permeability of porous rock using NMR T2 relaxation distribution[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2006,23(2):271-282.
彭石林,叶朝辉,刘买利.多孔介质渗透率的NMR测定[J].波谱学杂志,2006,23(2):271-282.
[31]Lowden B D,Porter M J,Powrie L S.T2 Relaxation Time Versus Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure:implications for NMR Logging and Reserviore Characterization[C].Hague:SPE European Petroleum Conference,1998:323-325.
[32]Altunbay M,Martain R,Robinson M,et al.Capilary Pressure Date from NMR Logs and Its Implications on Field Economics[C].New Orleans:SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition,1999:3-5.
[33]Li Haibo,Zhu Juyi,Guo Hekun.Methods for calculating pore radius distribution in rock from NMR T2 spectra[J].Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance,2008,25(2):273-280.
李海波,朱巨义,郭和坤.核磁共振T2谱换算孔隙半径分布方法研究[J].波谱学杂志,2008,25(2):273-280.
[1] 胡素云, 陶士振, 闫伟鹏, 门广田, 唐振兴, 薛建勤, 贾希玉, 陈旋, 江涛, 黄东, 梁晓伟. 中国陆相致密油富集规律及勘探开发关键技术研究进展[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1083-1093.
[2] 方向, 杨智, 郭旭光, 吴颜雄, 刘俊田. 中国重点盆地致密油资源分级评价标准及勘探潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1094-1105.
[3] 李国会, 康德江, 姜丽娜, 姜瀚, 李淼, 孙海雷, 伍英. 松辽盆地北部扶余油层致密油成藏条件及甜点区优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1106-1113.
[4] 唐振兴, 赵家宏, 王天煦. 松辽盆地南部致密油“甜点区(段)”评价与关键技术应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1114-1124.
[5] 张道伟, 马达德, 伍坤宇, 吴颜雄, 夏晓敏, 张审琴, 张晓秋. 柴达木盆地致密油“甜点区(段)”评价与关键技术应用——以英西地区下干柴沟组上段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1134-1149.
[6] 吴因业, 吕佳蕾, 方向, 杨智, 王岚, 马达德, 陶士振. 湖相碳酸盐岩—混积岩储层有利相带分析——以柴达木盆地古近系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1150-1157.
[7] 夏晓敏, 吴颜雄, 张审琴, 薛建勤, 王岚, 施奇, 崔涵, 赵权. 湖相滩坝砂体构型及对致密油甜点开发的意义——以柴达木盆地扎哈泉地区扎2井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1158-1167.
[8] 江涛, 杨德相, 吴健平, 胡延旭, 韩琪, 李彬, 杨若羿, 吴小梅, 黄远鑫. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷束鹿凹陷古近系沙三段下亚段致密油“甜点”主控因素与发育模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1199-1211.
[9] 黄东, 杨光, 杨智, 杨天泉, 白蓉, 李育聪, 戴鸿鸣. 四川盆地致密油勘探开发新认识与发展潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1212-1221.
[10] 尤源, 梁晓伟, 冯胜斌, 牛小兵, 淡卫东, 李卫成, 王芳, . 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段致密储层主要黏土矿物特征及其地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(8): 1233-1241.
[11] 赵正望, 唐大海, 王小娟, 陈双玲. 致密砂岩气藏天然气富集高产主控因素探讨——以四川盆地须家河组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 963-972.
[12] 崔景伟, 朱如凯, 李森, 齐亚林, 时晓章, 毛治国, . 坳陷湖盆烃源岩发育样式及其对石油聚集的控制——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 982-996.
[13] 李阳, 倪小明, 王延斌, 陶传奇. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区上古生界压力特征及其成因机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 997-1005.
[14] 刘玲, 沃玉进, 孙炜, 陈霞, 徐美娥, 刘力辉. 龙门山前侏罗系沙溪庙组致密砂岩储层叠前地震预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(7): 1072-1082.
[15] 李勇, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 肖正录, 何清波, 苏恺明, 李俊良. 近源间互式煤系致密砂岩气成藏主控因素——以川中地区须家河组天然气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(6): 798-808.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!