天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 •    下一篇

四川盆地自流井区块自2井缝洞系统结构与水侵途径和模式

熊钰1,刘斯琪1,余翔2,唐建荣2,傅希桐1   

  1. 1.西南石油大学,四川 成都 610500;
    2.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川 成都 610512
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-16 修回日期:2019-03-13 出版日期:2019-07-10
  • 作者简介:熊钰(1968-),男,四川营山人,教授,博士,主要从事复杂气田开发理论与方法、油气藏工程动态理论与方法、注气提高采收率、油气藏相态理论研究.E-mail:xiongyu-swpi@126.com.
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划“致密气藏储层无固相残留深度干化技术基础研究”项目(编号:2019YJ0424)资助.

Research on the fractured-vuggy system structure and pathways and patterns of water intrusion from Well Z2

Xiong Yu1,Liu Si-qi1,Yu Xiang2,Tang Jian-rong2,Fu Xi-tong1   

  1. 1.Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China;
    2.PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company,Chengdu 610512,China
  • Received:2019-01-16 Revised:2019-03-13 Online:2019-07-10
  • About author:Xiong Yu(1968-), Male, Professor, Ph.D, Mainly engaged in complex gas field development theory and method, oil and gas reservoir engineering dynamic theory and method, gas injection to enhance recovery, oil and gas reservoir phase theory research. E-mail:xiongyu-swpi@126.com.
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Sichuan Province, China “Basic research on solid-free deep drying technology in tight gas reservoirs” (Grant No. 2019YJ0424). 

摘要: 四川盆地自流井区块自2井缝洞系统因其独特的地理位置、完井方式以及卓越的社会经济效益备受关注,研究其缝洞系统结构和水侵模式,对气藏生产末期管理和预测采收率具有重要意义。因此,首先结合茅口组和栖霞组的溶蚀特点,从该井的生产特点出发,在储量和水侵动态分析方法的论述基础上,从多个方面详细阐述了该缝洞系统的典型地质特点,论证了栖霞组缝洞基本结构及规模,给出了该井的缝洞结构及水侵模式,同时应用非线性物质拟合法、AIF法和补给型物质平衡法对自2井水侵动态进行了研究,分析了其缝洞结构对生产的影响并预测了其生产潜力。此外,根据其历史作用,系统地总结了该井在缝洞型气藏开发中的历史地位和作用。研究对类似的缝洞型油气藏的开发具有一定的指导作用。

关键词: 缝洞系统, 自2井, 水侵动态, 栖霞组, 典型

Abstract: Since the Well Z2 seam system has attracted much attention due to its unique geographical location,completion method and excellent social and economic benefits.Studying the structure of the fracture cavity system and the water intrusion model are of great significance for the terminal management and predictive recovery of gas reservoir production.Therefore,based on the dissolution characteristics of Maokou and Qixia Formations,the production characteristics of the well and the discussion of the dynamic analytical method of reserves and water invasion,this paper expounds the typical geological characteristics of the fracture-cave system from many aspects,demonstrates the basic structure and scale of the fracture-cave system of Qixia Formation,and gives the fracture-cave structure and water invasion mode of the well.And the nonlinear material fitting method,AIF method and replenishment material balance method were used to study the water intrusion dynamics of Well 2,and the influence of the fracture cavity structure on production was predicted and its production potential was predicted.According to its historical role,this paper systematically summarizes the historical position and role of this well in the development of fractured-vuggy gas reservoirs,which has a certain guidance for the development of similar fractured-vuggy gas reservoirs.

Key words: Fractured-vuggy system, Z2 Well, Water intrusion dynamics, Qixia Formation, Typical

中图分类号: 

  • TE34
[1]Yao Linyu.Study on Water Intrusion Dynamics of Fracture-Cavity Gas Reservoirs[D].Chendu:Southwest Petroleum University,2007.
姚麟昱.缝洞型气藏水侵动态研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2007.
[2]Xiong Yu,Zhang Jianye,Shi Yanling,et al.Study on water intrusion dynamics from Well Z2[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2007,30(4):41-45,86.
熊钰,张建业,史燕玲,等.自2井水侵动态研究[J].天然气勘探与开发,2007,30(4):41-45,86.
[3]Jin L,Wojtanowicz A K,Hughes R G.An analytical model for water coning control installation in reservoir with bottomwater[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,2010,49(5):65-70.
[4]Zhang Q,Li X F,Song Z,et al.A Prediction of Water Breakthrough Time in Low Permeability Gas Reservoirs With Bottom Water[C]∥SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition.Society of Petroleum Engineers,2011.
[5]Smulski R.Comparative analysis of selected models of water coning in gas reservoirs/analiza porównawcza wybranych modeli powstawania stoków wodnych w zoach gazowych[J].Archives of Mining Sciences,2012,57(2):451-470.
[6]Qu M,Hou J,Qi P,et al.Experimental study of fluid behaviors from water and nitrogen floods on a 3-D visual fractured-vuggy model[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2018(166):871-879.
[7]Guo Zhenzhen,Li Zhiping,Yang Zhihao,et al.Method for judging water intrusion mode by dynamic data of Yangta 1 gas reservoir production[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2015,15(1):206-209,214.
郭珍珍,李治平,杨志浩,等.羊塔1气藏生产动态资料判断水侵模式方法[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(1):206-209,214.
[8]Fan Huaicai,Zhong Bing,Liu Yicheng,et al.Study on unsteady water intrusion law of  triple media bottom water gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2015,26(3):556-563.
樊怀才,钟兵,刘义成,等.三重介质底水气藏非稳态水侵规律研究[J].天然气地球科学,2015,26(3):556-563.
[9]Fang Feifei,Li Xizhe,Gao Shusheng,et al.Experimental study on water intrusion of edge and bottom water gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(12):2246-2252.
方飞飞,李熙喆,高树生,等.边、底水气藏水侵规律可视化实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(12):2246-2252.
[10]Yu Qingyan,Liu Pengcheng,Li Yong,et al.Study on mathematical model and influencing factors of horizontal well water intrusion in fracture-cavity bottom water gas reservoir[J].Geoscience,2017,31(3):614-622.
于清艳,刘鹏程,李勇,等.缝洞型底水气藏水平井水侵动态数学模型与影响因素研究[J].现代地质,2017,31(3):614-622.
[11]Feng Xi,Peng Xian,Li Longxin,et al.Effects of reservoir heterogeneity on water intrusion differentiation in carbonate gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(6):67-75.
冯曦,彭先,李隆新,等.碳酸盐岩气藏储层非均质性对水侵差异化的影响[J].天然气工业,2018,38(6):67-75.
[12]Xiong Yu,Teng Peng,Ye Haifeng,et al.Study on indoor well test simulation of fracture-cavity reservoirs[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2017,17(29):80-84.
熊钰,滕鹏,叶海峰,等.缝洞型油气藏室内试井模拟实验[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(29):80-84.
[13]Xiong Yu,Yang Shuiqing,Yue Hong,et al.Water intrusion dynamic analysis method for fractured bottom water gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(1):61-64,142.
熊钰,杨水清,乐宏,等.裂缝型底水气藏水侵动态分析方法[J].天然气工业,2010,30(1):61-64,142.
[14]Xiong Yu,Chen Yan,Deng Xuefeng,et al.Characteristics of gas and water distribution in the condensate gas reservoir of Qianmiqiao main buried hill[J].Special Oil & Gas Reservoir,2009,16(6):48-51,97.
熊钰,陈艳,邓学峰,等.千米桥主潜山凝析气藏气水分布特征[J].特种油气藏,2009,16(6):48-51,97.
[15]Ding Zhao,Xiong Yu.The influence of pressure drop method on the calculation accuracy of water-bearing gas reserves and its adaptability[J].Inner Mongolia Petrochemical,2010,36(17):43-44.
丁钊,熊钰.压降法对有水气藏储量计算精度的影响及其适应性[J].内蒙古石油化工,2010,36(17):43-44.
[16]Xiong Yu,Zhang Liehui,Tang Jianrong.Study on the influence of mixing rules on the prediction accuracy of natural gas compression factor[J].Petroleum and Natural Gas Chemical Industry,2004,33(6):447-449,452.
熊钰,张烈辉,唐建荣.混合规则对天然气压缩因子预测精度的影响研究[J].石油与天然气化工,2004,33(6):447-449,452.
[17]Wang Nutao,Huang Bingguang,Zhang Chongjun,et al.A novel method of calculating water-flooded gas in place and water influx of water drive gas reservoirs[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2000,22(4):26-27.
王怒涛,黄炳光,张崇军,等.水驱气藏动态储量及水侵量计算新方法[J].西南石油学院学报,2000,22(4):26-27.
[18]Xiong Yu,Hu Shuqing,Qu Lin,et al.Study on the properties of local sequestration water and dynamic analysis of water intrusion in heterogeneous gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(2):78-81.
熊钰,胡述清,曲林,等.非均质气藏局部封存水体性质及水侵动态分析方法研究[J].天然气工业,2004,24(2):78-81.
[19]Wang Laichao,Xiong Yu,Chen Lin,et al.Calculation of bottom hole pressure and optimization design of construction parameters for gas lift-bubble combination process[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Reservoir Evaluation and Development,2012,2(6):53-57.
汪来潮,熊钰,陈霖,等.气举—泡排组合工艺井底压力计算及施工参数优化设计[J].油气藏评价与开发,2012,2(6):53-57.
[20]Yu Xiang,Xiong Yu,Du Jiming,et al.Dynamic analysis of production from the end of Well Z2[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2008,31(2):80-83.
余翔,熊钰,杜济明,等.自2井末期生产动态分析研究[J].钻采工艺,2008,31(2):80-83.
[21]Sun Jianmeng,Ren Huaijian,Zhao Wenjie,et al.Application of node analysis method for oil and gas well productivity prediction[J].Well Logging Technology,2006,30(4):350-353,384.
孙建孟,任怀建,赵文杰,等.应用节点分析法进行油气井产能预测研究[J].测井技术,2006,30(4):350-353,384.
[1] 张磊, 徐兵祥, 辛翠平, 乔向阳, 穆景福, 许阳, 韩长春. 考虑主裂缝的页岩气产能预测模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 247-256.
[2] 孙东,杨丽莎,王宏斌,郑多明,孙勤华,李国会,代冬冬,房启飞. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区走滑断裂体系对奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S1): 80-87.
[3] 李晶,孙婧,陶明信. 全球油气探明储量与大油气田的分布及地质构造背景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 259-267.
[4] 何家雄, 颜文, 马文宏, 祝有海, 陈胜红, 龚晓峰. 南海北部准被动陆缘深水区油气地质及与世界深水油气富集区类比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(6): 897-908,995.
[5] 陈宗清. 论四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组天然气勘探[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(3): 325-334.
[6] 宋换新;文志刚;唐友军;李浮萍;. 南陵―无为地区下二叠统栖霞组烃源岩评价与标定[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(3): 334-337.
[7] 陈刚; 何家雄; 张伟. 莺歌海盆地CO2成因及与国内外典型CO2气藏的类比[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1996, 7(4): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[2] 周兴熙;. 库车油气系统油气藏相态分布及其控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(3): 205 -213 .
[3] 刘春慧;金振奎;朱桂芳;王庆东;张建良. . 准噶尔盆地东部吉木萨尔凹陷二叠系梧桐沟组储层物性特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(3): 375 -379 .
[4] 张顺存,;王凌;石新璞;方琳浩,;董文举,;孔玉华 . 准噶尔盆地腹部陆西地区石炭系火山岩储层的物性特征及其与电性的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(2): 198 -203 .
[5] 李士祥;胡明毅;李霞;. 榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(2): 200 -205 .
[6] 刘文汇;黄第藩;熊传武;徐永昌;. 成烃理论的发展及国外未熟―低熟油气的分布与研究现状[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1999, 10(1-2): 1 -22 .
[7] 胡雄;李延钧;陈新领;江波;马立协;付晓文;王强;梁艳;. 柴北缘马海地区油气全烃地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 612 -616 .
[8] 张朝;张廷山;魏祥峰;戴传瑞;王秀林 . 也门X区块下白垩统沉积相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(06): 835 -839 .
[9] 陈凤喜 王勇 张吉 杨勇. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田盒8气藏开发有利区块优选研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2009, 20(1): 94 -99 .
[10] 白斌, 邹才能, 朱如凯, 翟文亮, 刘柳红, 戴朝成, 张健, 杜红权, 毛治国. 利用露头、自然伽玛、岩石地球化学和测井地震一体化综合厘定层序界面——以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(1): 78 -86 .