天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层覆压孔渗实验对比研究

程鸣,傅雪海,张苗,程维平,渠丽珍   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学煤层气资源与成藏过程教育部重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;
    2.山西省地质矿产研究院,山西 太原 030001
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-03 修回日期:2018-05-23 出版日期:2018-08-10 发布日期:2018-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 傅雪海(1965-),男,湖南衡阳人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事能源地质的教学与研究. E-mail:fuxuehai@163.com
  • 作者简介:程鸣(1993-),男,山西太原人,硕士研究生,主要从事非常规天然气研究.E-mail:1194593854@qq.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41772158);山西省煤基重点科技攻关项目(编号:MQ2014-02)联合资助.
     

Comparative study on porosity and permeability in net confining stress of three natural gases in coal series reservoirs in Guxian County,Qinshui Basin

Cheng Ming,Fu Xue-hai,Zhang Miao,Cheng Wei-ping,Qu Li-zhen   

  1. 1.School of Resource and Earth Science,China University of Mining and Technology,Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoirs,Xuzhou 221116,China;
    2.Shanxi Provincial Research Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources,Taiyuan 030001,China
  • Received:2018-04-03 Revised:2018-05-23 Online:2018-08-10 Published:2018-08-10

摘要:

为了揭示煤系中煤层、泥页岩、致密砂岩覆压下的孔隙度和渗透率差异变化特征,采集山西沁水盆地古县区块2块煤样、2块泥页岩和4块砂岩样品,开展了覆压孔渗对比实验研究。结果表明煤系“三气”储层覆压下孔隙度与渗透率随有效应力增加呈负指数形式减少,煤储层、泥页岩储层、致密砂岩储层孔隙度压缩系数比值为1∶1∶0.58,渗透率衰减系数比值为1∶0.73∶0.78。“三气”储层孔隙度、渗透率应力损害率随有效应力增加呈两段式增加,有效应力<4MPa,“三气”储层孔隙度和渗透率损害率均随有效应力的增大呈快速增大的趋势,有效应力>4MPa,随有效应力的增大增幅逐渐平稳,煤储层、泥页岩储层、致密砂岩储层应力敏感性依次降低。研究成果对煤系“三气”的共探共采具有理论意义和实际意义。
 

关键词: 煤系&ldquo, 三气&ldquo, 储层, 覆压, 孔隙度, 渗透率, 应力敏感性

Abstract:

In order to reveal the characteristics of the difference in porosity and permeability of coal,shales and tight sandstones in coal series,2 coal samples,2 shale samples,and 4 sandstone samples were collected from the Guxian County,Qinshui Basin,Shanxi Province,and a comparative study of the net confining stress permeability was conducted.The results show that the porosity and permeability of three natural gases in coal series reservoirs increase exponentially with the increase of effective stress,and the ratio of porosity compressibility of coal reservoirs,shale reservoirs and sandstone reservoirs is 1∶1∶0.58,the permeability attenuation coefficient ratio is 1∶0.73∶0.78.The porosity and permeability stress damage rate of three natural gas reservoir  increase with the increase of effective stress in the form of two-stage,and the effective stress is <4MPa.The porosity and permeability damage rate  of three natural gases reservoir both follow the effective stress.The increase shows a rapid upward trend with an effective stress of >4MPa.With the increase of effective stress,the growing rate is gradually stable,and the stress sensitivity of coal reservoirs,shale reservoirs,and sandstone reservoirs decreases sequentially.The research results have theoretical and practical significance for the co-examination of the three natural gases in coal series.

 

Key words: Three natural gases in coal series reservoirs, Net confining stress, Porosity, Permeability, Stress sensitivity

中图分类号: 

  • TE135

[1]Wang Tong,Wang Qingwei,Fu Xuehai.Systematic study and its significance of unconventional natural gas in coal system[J].Coal Geology and Exploration,2014,42(1):24-27.
王佟,王庆伟,傅雪海.煤系非常规天然气的系统研究及其意义[J].煤田地质与勘探,2014,42(1):24-27.
[2]Li Xiangchen,Kang Yili,Luo Pingya.Rock deformation mechanisms and its influence on poecolation ability for CBM reservoirs[J].China Mining Magazine,2009,18(3):99-102.
李相臣,康毅力,罗平亚.煤层气储层变形机理及对渗流能力的影响研究[J].中国矿业,2009,18(3):99-102.
[3]Jia Wenrui,Li Fukai.A study on some issues of development disposition of a low permeability oilfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1995,22(4):47-51.
贾文瑞,李福垲.低渗透油田开发部署中几个问题的研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1995,22(4):47-51.
[4]Lu Jiating,Li Wei.Experimental study on permeability sensitivity of low permeability sandstone permeability[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(3):339-341.
卢家亭,李闽.低渗砂岩渗透率应力敏感性实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(3):339-341.
[5]Wu Xiangyang,Chen Zu’an,Sun Deming,et al.An experimental study of changes of porosity of sandstones with pressure[J].Acta Geophysica Sinica,1995,38(A01):275-280.
伍向阳,陈祖安,孙德明,等.静水压力下砂岩孔隙度变化实验研究[J].地球物理学报,1995,38(A01):275-280.
[6]Wang Liqiang,Liu Huiqing,Zhen Siguang,et al.Quantitative research on stress sensitivity of low permeability reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(1):96-99,103.
王厉强,刘慧卿,甄思广,等.低渗透储层应力敏感性定量解释研究[J].石油学报,2009,30(1):96-99,103.
[7]Enever J R E,Henning A.The Relationship between Permeability and Effective Stress for Australian coal and its Implications with Respect to Coalbed Methane Exploration and Reservoir Modeling[C].Proceedings of the 1997 International Coalbed Methane Symposiu
m,1997:13-22.
[8]Liang Bing,Shi Yingshuang,Sun Weiji,et al.Reservoir forming characteristics of  “the three gases” in coal measure and the possibility of commingling in China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):167-173.
梁冰,石迎爽,孙维吉,等.中国煤系“三气”成藏特征及共采可能性[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):167-173.
[9]Zhang Shouren.Prospects for effective approaches to deep seam CBM development[J].China Coalbed Methane,2011,8(4):18-21.
张守仁.深煤层煤层气开发有效途径展望[J].中国煤层气,2011,8(4):18-21.
[10]Qin Yong,Shen Jian,Shen Yulin.Joint mining compatibility of superposed gas-bearing systems:A general geological problem for extraction of three natural gases and deep CBM in coal series[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2016,41(1):14-23.
秦勇,申建,沈玉林.叠置含气系统共采兼容性——煤系“三气”及深部煤层气开采中的共性地质问题[J].煤炭学报,2016,41(1):14-23.
[11]Yang Xiaodong,Zhang Miao,Wei Wei,et al.Comparison of pore characteristics of the “Three Gas” reservoir in the coal seams of Guxian County,Qinshui Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(3):356-365.
杨晓东,张苗,魏巍,等.沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层孔隙特征对比[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(3):356-365.
[12]Zhong Gaorun,Zhang Xiaoli,Du Jiangmin,et al.Experimental study on stress sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoirs[J].Progress in Geophysics,2016,31(3):1300-1306.
钟高润,张小莉,杜江民,等.致密砂岩储层应力敏感性实验研究[J].地球物理学进展,2016,31(3):1300-1306.
[13]Meng Zhaoping,Hou Quanlin.Experimental research on stress sensitivity of coal reservoir and its influencing factors[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(3):430-437.
孟召平,侯泉林.煤储层应力敏感性及影响因素的试验分析[J].煤炭学报,2012,37(3):430-437.
[14]Chen Shuyuan,Qin Yong,Shen Jian,et al.Experimental study on temperature sensitivity of high rank coal permeability[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2014,39(9):1845-1851.
陈术源,秦勇,申建,等.高阶煤渗透率温度应力敏感性试验研究[J].煤炭学报,2014,39(9):1845-1851.
[15]Qin Jiyu.Study on the law of permeability of low permeability sandstone reservoir under variable confining pressure[J].Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Natural Science,2002,17(4):28-31.[JP]
秦积舜.变围压条件下低渗砂岩储层渗透率变化规律研究[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2002,17(4):28-31.

[1] 张荣虎,王珂,王俊鹏,孙雄伟,李君,杨学君,周露. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深构造带克深8区块裂缝性低孔砂岩储层地质模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1264-1273.
[2] 任茜莹,代金友,穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376-1382.
[3] 刘琴琴,陈桂华,陈晓智,祝彦贺,杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[4] 杨海军,张荣虎,杨宪彰,王珂,王俊鹏,唐雁刚,周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[5] 康毅力,豆联栋,游利军,陈强,程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[6] 周波,曹颖辉,齐井顺,黄世伟,刘策,贾进华,陈秀艳. 塔里木盆地古城地区下奥陶统储层发育机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 773-783.
[7] 王珊,曹颖辉,杜德道,王石,李洪辉,董洪奎,严威,白莹. 塔里木盆地柯坪—巴楚地区肖尔布拉克组储层特征与主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 784-795.
[8] 游利军,王哲,康毅力,张杜杰. 致密砂岩孔渗对盐析的响应实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 866-872.
[9] 郭睿良,陈小东,马晓峰,马静,[王琪],陈霖. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长7段致密储层水平向可动流体特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 665-674.
[10] 王国龙,杜社宽. 准噶尔盆地北三台凸起二叠系梧桐沟组一段碎屑岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 675-681.
[11] 钟 佳,尤丽,张迎朝,曲希玉,代龙,吴仕玖. 琼东南盆地乐东—陵水凹陷黄流组峡谷水道储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 708-718.
[12] 胡向阳,李宏涛,史云清,肖开华,郭艳东,李浩,高君. 川西坳陷斜坡带蓬莱镇组三段沉积特征与储层分布——以什邡地区JP32砂组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 468-480.
[13] 刘喜杰,马遵敬,韩冬,王海燕,马立涛,葛东升. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块致密砂岩优质储层形成的主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 481-490.
[14] 张丹锋,胡文瑞,李莉,侯秀林,吕洲,周杨,张洋,王丽宁. 震动压实作用特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 328-336.
[15] 张永庶,伍坤宇,姜营海,王鹏,蔡智洪,高发润,谭武林,高树芳,鲜本忠. 柴达木盆地英西深层碳酸盐岩油气藏地质特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 358-369.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 奎明清,刘波,陈朝晖,姜义权,保吉成,范新文. 涩北一号气田隔层特征及对气田出水影响研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5): 944 -947 .
[2] 扈福堂,师永民,许文平. 涩北气田疏松砂岩气藏出砂预测模型建立[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(5): 948 -951 .
[3] 张月巧,郭彦如,侯 伟,赵振宇,高建荣.
鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘中上奥陶统烃源岩特征及勘探潜力
[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(5): 894 -904 .
[4] 黄军平,杨克荣,杨占龙,王斌婷,向倪娇,邓毅林,韩小峰. 雅布赖盆地侏罗系烃源岩特征及油气勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(5): 948 -955 .
[5] 梁峰,朱炎铭,漆麟,王红岩,拜文华,马超,张琴,会英,武瑾. 湖南常德地区牛蹄塘组富有机质页岩成藏条件及含气性控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 180 -188 .
[6] 季晓红,黄梦云,单锋,周锦明,张浩,张金柏. 塔里木盆地塔中地区奥陶系超埋深碳酸盐岩凝析气田水平井储层分段酸压改造应用实践及认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S2): 186 -197 .
[7] . 《天然气地球科学》2016-4期封面及目次[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 1 -2 .
[8] 石新朴,胡清雄,解志薇,杨朝栋,周隶华,孙德强,吕灿,贾智彬,赵振. 火山岩岩性、岩相识别方法——以准噶尔盆地滴南凸起火山岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10): 1808 -1816 .
[9] 黄雨,李晓平,谭晓华. 三重介质复合气藏水平井不稳定产量递减动态分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1190 -1197 .
[10] . 论文摘要撰写规范[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1215 -1216 .