天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地侏罗系致密油刻度区精细解剖与关键参数研究

李登华1,李建忠1,汪少勇2,张斌2   

  1. 1.国土资源部油气资源战略研究中心,北京 100034;2.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-05 修回日期:2016-08-17 出版日期:2016-09-10 发布日期:2016-09-10
  • 作者简介:李登华(1972-),男,山东金乡人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事油气资源评价、非常规油气综合地质研究等. E-mail:LDH0709@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    中国石油股份公司重大科技专项“四川盆地侏罗系石油勘探开发关键技术研究” (编号:2012E-2601);中国石油股份公司重大科技专项“中国石油第四次油气资源评价”(编号:2013E-0502);国土资源部重大科技专项“页岩气、致密油气、煤层气等非常规油气资源动态评价”(编号:2014YQKYQ0129)联合资助.

Fine dissection of Jurassic tight oil calibrated area and key parameters researchin Sichuan Basin,China

Li Deng-hua1,Li Jian-zhong1,Wang Shao-yong2,Zhang Bin2   

  1. 1.Strategic Research Center of Oil and Gas Resources,Ministry of Land and Resourcesof the People’s Republic of China,Beijing 100034,China;
    2.PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2016-04-05 Revised:2016-08-17 Online:2016-09-10 Published:2016-09-10

摘要: 四川盆地侏罗系是我国致密油累计产量最高的层系,虽经历3轮资源评价,但均以常规油气的思路和方法进行评价,其致密油资源总量并未得到真实体现。通过分析四川盆地侏罗系致密油的基本地质条件,优选出公山庙油田作为典型刻度区,针对大安寨段和凉高山组2套主力油层开展精细解剖,根据地质条件和单井EUR,将刻度区划分为甜点区、有利区和外围区3种类型,并确定了小面元容积法、分级资源丰度类比法、EUR类比法3种致密油资源评价方法的关键参数取值标准,为四川盆地侏罗系致密油资源评价奠定了基础,也为我国致密油资源评价提供了类比依据。

关键词: 致密油, 资源评价, 刻度区, 关键参数, 甜点区

Abstract: The Jurassic in Sichuan Basin is the highest cumulative production series of strata.Based on conventional thoughts and methods,its resource has been estimated three times,but the total amount of tight oil has not been truly revealed.Gongshanmiao Oilfield is selected as typical calibrated area by analyzing basical geological conditions of Jurassic in Sichuan Basin,and two major reservoirs,Da’anzhai and Lianggaoshan Formations,have been finely dissected.According to the geological conditions and single well EUR,Gongshanmiao scale area is divided into three types:Sweet spot area,favorable area and external region.There are three resource evaluation methods including volumetric method for small area,analogous method for abundance of resources and EUR analogous method.Assignment criteria of key parameter for three methods are established.It not only lays a foundation for tight oil resource evaluation in Sichuan Basin,but also provides an analogous basis for national tight oil resource assessment.

Key words: Tight oil, Resources evaluation, Calibrated area, Key parameter, Sweet spot area

中图分类号: 

  • TE155

[1]Liang Digang,Ran Longhui,Dai Danshen,et al.A re-recognition of the prospecting potential of Jurassic large-area and non-conventional oils in the central-northern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(1):8-17.[梁狄刚,冉隆辉,戴弹申,等.四川盆地中北部侏罗系大面积非常规石油勘探潜力的再认识[J].石油学报,2011,32(1):8-17.]
[2]Deng Kangling.Geological conditions of Daanzhai oil gas reservoir forming in artesian well group of Baiya Shilongchang region in Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2001,8(2):9-13.[邓康龄.四川盆地柏垭—石龙场地区自流井组大安寨段油气成藏地质条件[J].油气地质与采收率,2001,8(2):9-13.]
[3]Wang Shiqian,Chen Gengsheng,Huang Xianping.Petroleum resource potential and major exploration areas in Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2005,26(supplement):97-101.[王世谦,陈更生,黄先平.四川盆地油气资源潜力及重点勘探领域[J].石油学报,2005,26(增刊):97-101.]
[4]Wang Shiqian,Hu Suyun,Dong Dazhong.Jurassic tight oil & gas resources in east Sichuan Basin:A new exploration target[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(12):22-29,125-126.[王世谦,胡素云,董大忠.川东侏罗系——四川盆地亟待重视的一个致密油气新领域[J].天然气工业,2012,32(12):22-29,125-126.]
[5]EIA.Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources:An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States[EB/OL].2013-07-30.http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/ pdf/overview.pdf.[JP]
[6]Zou Caineng,Zhang Guosheng,Yang Zhi,et al.Geological concepts,characteristics,resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon:On unconventional petroleum geology[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):385-399,454.[邹才能,张国生,杨智,等.非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术——兼论非常规油气地质学[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):385-399,454.]
[7]Chen Jianping,Zhao Changyi,He Zhonghua,et al.Criteria for evaluating the hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter in coal measures[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1997,24(1):1-5,91.[陈建平,赵长毅,何忠华,等.煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J].石油勘探与开发,1997,24(1):1-5,91.]
[8]Zhao Chenglin,Zhu Xiaomin.Sedimentary Petrology[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:163-164.[赵澄林,朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:163-164.]
[9]Ding Yi,Li Zhiwu,Feng Feng,et al.Mixing of lacustrine siliciclastic-carbonate sediments and its significance for tight oil exploration in the Daanzhai member,Ziliujing Formation,Lower Jurassic,in Longgang area,Central Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Review,2013,59(2):389-400.[丁一,李智武,冯逢,等.川中龙岗地区下侏罗统自流井组大安寨段湖相混合沉积及其致密油勘探意义[J].地质论评,2013,59(2):389-400.]
[10]Ni Chao,Hao Yi,Hou Gangfu,et al.Cognition and significance of Lower Jurassic Daanzhai organic muddy shell limestone reservoir in central Sichuan Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2012,17(2):45-56.[倪超,郝毅,厚刚福,等.四川盆地中部侏罗系大安寨段含有机质泥质介壳灰岩储层的认识及其意义[J].海相油气地质,2012,17(2):45-56.]
[11]Xu Shuanghui,Chen Hongde,Lin Liangbiao,et al.Reservoir characteristic of Da’anzhai segment of Quxian area in northeast of Sichuan,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(2):200-208.[徐双辉,陈洪德,林良彪,等.川东北渠县地区大安寨段储层特征[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(2):200-208.]
[12]Liao Qunshan,Hu Hua,Lin Jianping,et al.Petroleum exploration prospect of the Jurassic tight reservoirs in central Sichuan Basin[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2011,32(54):815-822,838.[廖群山,胡华,林建平,等.四川盆地川中侏罗系致密储层石油勘探前景[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(54):815-822,838.][JP]
[13]Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G,Gao Haiyu.Stochastic simulation of undiscovered petroleum accumulation[C]//Leuangthong O,Deutsch C V.Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics.Deutsch:Springer,2005:661-670.
[14]Chen Zhuoheng,Osadetz K G.Geological risk mapping and prospect evaluation using multivariate and Bayesian methods,western Sverdrup Basin of Canada[J].AAPG Bulletin,2006,90(6):859-872.
[15]Crovelli R A.AnalyticResource Assessment Method for Continuous(Unconventional)Oil and Gas Accumulations-The "ACCESS" Method[R/OL].2005.http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1146/OF12-1146.pdf.
[16]Guo Qiulin,Zhou Changqian,Chen Ningsheng,et al.Evaluation methods for unconventional hydrocarbon resources[J].Lithologic Reservoirs,2011,23(4):12-16.[郭秋麟,周长迁,陈宁生,等.非常规油气资源评价方法研究[J].岩性油气藏,2011,23(4):12-16.]
[17]Chen Zhouheng,Osadetz K G.An assessment of tight oil resource potential in the Upper Cretaceous Cardium Formation,western Canada sedimentary basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(3):321-327.[谌卓恒,Osadetz K G.西加拿大沉积盆地Cardium组致密油资源评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(3):321-327.]
[18]Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng,Wu Xiaozhi,et al.Methods of the tight oil resource assessment[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2013,18(2):67-75.[郭秋麟,陈宁生,吴晓智,等.致密油资源评价方法研究[J].中国石油勘探,2013,18(2):67-75.]
[19]Qiu Zhen,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Unconventional petroleum resources assessment:Progress and future prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):238-243.[邱振,邹才能,李建忠,等.非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(2):238-243.]
[20]Wang Shaoyong,Li Jianzhong,Li Denghua,et al.The potential of tight oil resource in Da’anzhai Formation of Gong Shanmiao,Jurassic of central Sichuan Basin[J].Geology in China,2013,40(2):481-482.[汪少勇,李建忠,李登华,等.川中地区公山庙油田侏罗系大安寨段致密油资源潜力分析[J].中国地质,2013,40(2):481-482.]
[21]Schmoker J W.U.S.Geological Survey Assessment Concepts for Continuous Petroleum Accumulations.Chapter 13 of Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province,Wyoming,Colorado,and Utah[C]//USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team ed.U.S.Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D,U.S.Geological Survey,Denver,Colorado:Version 1,2005:1-9.[JP]
[22]Haskett W J,Brown P J.Evaluation of Unconventional Resource Plays[C].SPE 96879.Dallas,Texas,USA:2005 SPE Annual Technical Conference,2005.

[1] 高永亮, 文志刚, 李威. 湖相富有机质细粒沉积岩地球化学特征及其对致密油气成藏的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组长7段为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(5): 729-739.
[2] 杨智峰, 曾溅辉, 韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[3] 何文军,杨海波,费李莹,王学勇,杨彤远,杨翼波,鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[4] 鲍祥生,谈迎,吴小奇,郑红军. 利用纵横波速度法预测泥页岩脆性矿物指数[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 245-250.
[5] 杨晓盈, 李永臣, 朱文涛, 黄纪勇, 单永乐, 张强. 贵州煤层气高产主控因素及甜点区综合评价模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1664-1671.
[6] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 王社教, 郭秋麟, 于京都, 郑曼, 陈宁生, 易庆. 我国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力、重点领域与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1383-1397.
[7] 黄少英, 杨文静, 卢玉红, 张科, 赵青, 凡闪. 塔里木盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1497-1505.
[8] 王彬, 张强, 吕福亮, 杨涛涛, 杨志力, 孙国忠, 吴敬武, . 南海海域新生界沉积盆地天然气成藏条件及资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1542-1552.
[9] 李登华,刘卓亚,张国生,郑志红,贾君,高煖,昝昕. 中美致密油成藏条件、分布特征和开发现状对比与启示[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1126-1138.
[10] 李威,文志刚,窦立荣,谢勰,王泽,李馨. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南地区油气富集与储层演化史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 920-929.
[11] 吴伟,谢军,石学文,赵圣贤,季春海,胡颖,郭艳波. 川东北巫溪地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件与勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 734-743.
[12] 张凤奇,钟红利,魏登峰,张凤博,柳伟明,刘伟. 鄂尔多斯盆地陕北斜坡东南部长7段致密砂岩油藏成藏物性下限[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 232-240.
[13] 邹才能, 赵群, 董大忠, 杨智, 邱振, 梁峰, 王南, 黄勇, 端安详, 张琴, 胡志明. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796.
[14] 雷启鸿,成良丙,王冲,樊建明,何右安,赵国玺. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7致密储层可动流体分布特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 26-31.
[15] 何文军,王绪龙,杨海波,贾希玉,鲍海娟,蓝文芳,丁靖. 准噶尔盆地典型刻度区选择及其资源量计算方法体系建立[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(1): 62-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 胡 斌,李广之,吴向华,邓天龙 . 岩屑荧光录井技术及荧光指标量化方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(1): 121 -124 .
[2] 徐永昌;刘文汇;沈平;陶明信;郑建京;. 天然气地球化学的重要分支――稀有气体地球化学[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(3): 157 -166 .
[3] 任以发;. 黄桥二氧化碳气田成藏特征与进一步勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 632 -636 .
[4] 王红岩,张建博,陈孟晋,刘洪林. 鄂尔多斯盆地煤层气与深盆气的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(6): 453 -455 .
[5] 李小彦, 解光新. 煤储层吸附时间特征及影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2003, 14(6): 502 -505 .
[6] 赵靖舟. 论幕式成藏[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(4): 469 -476 .
[7] 陈启林;杨占龙;关银录;卫平生;. 银根-额济纳裂谷盆地群凹陷结构样式及对成藏的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(5): 559 -563 .
[8] 钱诗友;曾溅辉;林会喜;孙锡文 . 辽东东地区石油运移和聚集物理模拟实验及机理分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 604 -610 .
[9] 孙德强;张涛;梁彬;祁文珍;刘健;翟志锋;杨联系;刘志舟;赵凡 . 柴达木盆地北缘油气成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 652 -656 .
[10] 余元洲;马小明;赵腊腊;杨丽蓉;闫宝东. 千米桥潜山老井潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(05): 690 -694 .