天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩小层划分与储层精细对比

赵圣贤,杨跃明,张鉴,王兰生,王兴志,罗超,田冲   

  1. (1.中国石油西南油气田公司勘探开发研究院,四川 成都 610051;
    2.页岩气评价与开采四川省重点实验室,四川 成都 610051;
    3.中国石油西南油气田公司,四川 成都 610051;
    4.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610500)
  • 收稿日期:2015-08-25 修回日期:2016-01-26 出版日期:2016-03-10 发布日期:2016-03-10
  • 作者简介:赵圣贤(1987-),男,四川绵阳人,工程师,硕士,主要从事页岩气储层地质研究. E-mail:zhaoshengxian@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项“页岩气勘探开发关键技术——南方海相页岩气开采试验”(编号:2012ZX05018-006);973计划项目“中国南方海相页岩气高效开发的基础研究—南方海相典型区块页岩气开发理论与技术适应性研究”(编号:2013CB228006);973计划项目“中国南方古生界页岩气赋存富集机理和资源潜力评价—南方古生界典型区块页岩气勘探潜力评价—长宁典型区块古生界页岩气勘探潜力评价”(编号:2012CB214706-03)联合资助.

Micro-layers division and fine reservoirs contrast of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale,Sichuan Basin,SW China

Zhao Sheng-xian,Yang Yue-ming,Zhang Jian,Wang Lan-sheng,Wang Xing-zhi,Luo Chao,Tian Chong   

  1. (1.Rresearch Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company,Chengdu 610051,China;
    2.Key Laboratory of Shale Gas Evaluation and Exploitation of Sichuan Province,Chengdu 610051,China;
    3.PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company,Chengdu 610051,China;
    4.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation/Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu 610500,China)
  • Received:2015-08-25 Revised:2016-01-26 Online:2016-03-10 Published:2016-03-10

摘要:

四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组海相页岩气工作已经从初期的资源调查、评层选区阶段进入大规模效益开发阶段,开展页岩地层小层划分及页岩储层精细对比,是页岩气勘探—开发一体化的迫切需要、是实施地质—工程一体化的重要指导。通过岩心描述、薄片鉴定、测井及实验分析资料对典型井的岩性、地层层序、沉积旋回、古生物等研究,进行区域小层划分;开展小层沉积微相对比及页岩储层精细对比,探讨各小层储层与产量影响关系。四川盆地龙马溪组底部龙一1亚段由下至上进行“四分”小层:龙一a1、龙一b1、龙一c1和龙一d1,龙一b1小层为全盆地标志层,对比性高龙一a1、龙一b1小层沉积微相以炭质泥棚级、硅质泥棚级为主,区域延续性好,为优势相带;龙一a1、龙一b1小层页岩储层以Ⅰ类为主,纵横向连续性好,龙一c1、龙一d1小层页岩储层以Ⅲ类和Ⅱ类为主,储层连续性差。通过生产井压裂效果分析表明,靠近龙马溪组底部的龙一a1小层和龙一b1小层优势微相发育,且Ⅰ类储层连续性好,其压裂效果好于顶部龙一c1、龙一d1小层。

关键词: 四川盆地, 下志留统龙马溪组, 小层划分, 沉积微相, 储层精细对比, 压裂效果应用

Abstract:

It is totally known that the work of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale in Sichuan Basin has entered large scale benefit development rather than resources survey,layers assessment or area choices as it was in the beginning.It urgently needs a significant direction for the integration of E & D,G & R to carry out micro-layers division and fine reservoirs.The micro-layers division begins with the study on lithology,sequence,facies,palaeontology of typical wells through core description,micro-flakes identification,logs and lab analysis.Probe effect relationship between reservoirs and output is examined by carrying out contrasts about microfacies & fine reservoirs of each micro-layer.It has been divided into four micro-layers of Lower Long 1 sub section,which are marked as “a”,”b”,”c” and ”d”.Among them the micro-layer-b is the mark among areas,which has the highest tracking.The microfacies of a & b are mainly carbon-muddy shelf and silicon-muddy shelf,which has fine area spread.The reservoirs of a & b are both type Ⅰ,which also has fine spread,though the reservoirs of c & d are mainly type Ⅲ & Ⅱ,which has the worse spread.Through the analysis of fracture effects on output-wells,it indicates that the fracture effects of a & b,which both have the advantage of microfacies,fine area spread of reservoir type I and at the bottom of Longmaxi Formation,will be better than c & d.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation, Micro-layers division, Fine reservoirs contrast, Fracture effects application

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+4

[1]Pu Boling,Jiang Youlu,Wang Yi,et al.Reservoir-forming conditions[JP] and favorable exploration zones of shale gas in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2010,31(2):225-230.[蒲泊伶,蒋有录,王毅,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件及有利地区分析[J].石油学报,2010,31(2):225-230.]
[2]Huang Jinliang,Zou Caineng,Li Jianzhong,et al.Shale gas accumulation conditions and favorable zones of Silurian Longmaxi Formation in south Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2012,37(5):782-787.[黄金亮,邹才能,李建忠,等.川南志留系龙马溪组页岩气形成条件与有利区分析[J].煤炭学报,2012,37 (5):782 -787.]
[3]Zhou Wen,Wang Hao,Xie Runcheng,et al.Lower Paleozoic reservoir characteristics and exploration potential of upper-middle Yangtze region[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2013,40(5):569-576.[周文,王浩,谢润成,等.中上扬子地区下古生界海相页岩气储层特征及勘探潜力[J],成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2013,40(5):569-576.]
[4]Wan Hongcheng,Sun Wei,Liu Shugen,et al.Evaluation of Wufeng- Longmaxi Formation shale gas situation and prospect in Sichuan Basin & periphery area[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2012,39(2):176-181.[万洪程,孙玮,刘树根,等.四川盆地及周缘地区五峰—龙马溪组页岩气概况及前景评价[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2012,39(2):176-181.]
[5]Li Jianzhong,Dong Dazhong,Chen Gengsheng,et al.A preliminary study on accumulation mechanism and enrichment pattern of shale gas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(5):11-16.[李建忠,董大忠,陈更生,等.中国页岩气资源前景与战略地位[J].天然气工业,2009,29 (5):11-16.]
[6]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum & Gas Geology[M].Second Edition.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013:127-168.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].第2.版北京:地质出版社,2013:127-168]
[7]Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Li Jianzhong,et al.Reservoir characteristics of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation of the Lower Silurian,southern Sichuan.[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(4):551-561.[王玉满,董大忠,李建忠,等.川南下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层特征[J].石油学报,2012,33(4):551-561]
[8]Dong Dazhong,Cheng Keming,Wang Shiqian,et al.An evaluation method of shale gas resource and its application in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29 (5):33-39.[董大忠,程克明,王世谦,等.页岩气资源评价方法及其在四川盆地的应用田[J].天然气工业,2009,29 (5):33-39.]
[9]Wang Xingzhi,Li Yizhen,Du Yang,et al.Study on Longmaxi Formation bottom boundary in Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2014,36(1):45-50.[王兴志,李宜真,杜洋,等.四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组底部界线研究[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,36(1):45-50.]
[10]Li Yanjun,Zhao Shengxian,Huang Yongbin,et al.The sedimentary micro-facies of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(8):1136-1148.[李延钧,赵圣贤,黄勇斌,等.四川盆地南部下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积微相研究[J].地质学报,2013,87(8):1136-1148.]
[11]Zhang Haiquan,Xu Xiaosong,Liu Wei,et al.Late Ordovician - Early Silurian Lithofacies paleogeography evolution and relationship of black shales of upper-middle Yangtze region[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2013,33(2):17-24.[张海全,许效松,刘伟,等.中上扬子地区晚奥陶世-早志留世岩相古地理演化与黑色页岩的关系[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2013,33(2):17-24]
[12]Zheng Herong,Gao Bo,Peng Yongmin.et al.Sedimentary evolution and shale gas exploration direction of the Lower Silurian in middle-upper Yangtze area[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):645-656.[郑和荣,高波,彭勇民,等.上扬子地区下志留统沉积演化与页岩气勘探方向[J],古地理学报,2013,15(5):645-656]
[13]Li Yifan,Fan Tailiang,Gao Zhiqian,et al.Sequence stratigraphy of silurian black shale and its distribution in the southeast area of Chongqing[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23 (2):299-306.[李一凡,樊太亮,高志前,等.渝东南地区志留系黑色页岩层序地层研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23 (2):299-306]
[14]Wang Yuman,Dong Dazhong,Li Xinjing,et al.Stratigraphic sequence and sedimentary characteristics of Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin and its peripheral areas[J].Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(3):12-21.[王玉满,董大忠,李新景,等.四川盆地及其周缘下志留统龙马溪组层序与沉积特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(3):12-21.]
[15]Gao Zhenzhong,He Youbin,Li Luozhao,et al.Genesis of the Guanyinqiao Member of the Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation in South China:“shallow-water shelly facies” or deep-water allogene sediments[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2008,10 (5):487-494.[高振中,何幼斌,李罗照,等.中国南方上奥陶统五峰组观音桥段成因讨论:是“浅水介壳相”,还是深水异地沉积[J].古地理学报,2008,10 (5):487-494.]
[16]Feng Zengzhao,Peng Yongmin,Jin Zhenkui,et al.Lithofacies palaeogeography of the early Ordovician in South China[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2001,3 (2):11-22.[冯增昭,彭勇民,金振奎,等.中国南方早奥陶世岩相古地理[J].古地理学报,2001,3 (2):11-22.]
[17]Chen Xu,Rong Jiayu,Zhou Zhiyu,et al .Qianzhong Uplift and Yichang rise in Ordovician-Silurian of upper Yangtze region[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2001.46 (12):1052-1056.[陈旭,戎嘉余,周志毅,等.上扬子区奥陶一志留纪之交的黔中隆起和宜昌上升[J].科学通报,2001.46 (12):1052-1056.]
[18]Wang Chuanshang,Wang Xiaofeng,Chen Xiaohong.Extinction and recovery of Organism in Ordovician-Silurian[J].Geology and Mineral Resources of South China,2001(2):28-34.[王传尚,汪啸风,陈孝红.奥陶系/志留系界线之交生物的绝灭与复苏[J].华南地质与矿产,2001(2):28-34]
[19]Pan Guitang,Chen Zhiliang.Formation and Evolution of Geological Structure in East Tethys Area[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1997:1-218.[潘桂堂,陈智梁.东特提斯地质构造形成演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1997:1-218.]
[20]Zhong Dalai.Paleotethys of West Yunnan and Sichuan Area[M].Beijing:Science Press,1998:1-231.[钟大赉.滇川西部古特提斯造山带[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:1-231.]
[21]Ren Jishun,Jiang Chunfa,Zhang Zhengkun,et al.Geotectonic Evolution of China[M].Beijing:Science Press,1998:1-124.[任纪舜,姜春发,张正坤,等.中国大地构造及其演化[M].北京:科学出版社,1998:1-124.]
[22]Yang Fengqing,Yin Hongfu,Yang Hengshu,et al.The songpan-garze massif:Its relationship with the Qinling fold belt and Yangtze platform and development[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,1994,68(3):208-218.[杨逢清,殷鸿福,杨恒书,等.松潘甘孜地块与秦岭褶皱带、扬子地台的关系及其发展史.[J].地质学报,1994,68(3):208-218.]
[23]Chen Jiayi,Yang Yongcheng,Huo Xiangguang,et al.Structure phylogeny of Qinling,Qilian and Kunlun Mountains & piece of North and South China Plate[J].Shaanxi Geological,1995,13(12):1-9.[陈家义,杨永成,霍向光,等.秦岭祁连山昆仑山构造发展史与南北中国板块的拼合[J].陕西地质,1995,13(12):1-9.]
[24]Song Wenhai.On nappe structure at northern sector of Longmen Mountains and its oil and gas prospects[J].Natural Gas Industry,1989,9(3):2-9.[宋文海.论龙门山北段推覆构造及油气前景[J].天然气工业,1989,9(3):2-9.]
[25]Luo Zhili,Long Xueming.The uplifting of the longmenshan orogenic zone and the subsidence of the west Sichuan foreland basin[J].Acta Geologica Sichuan,1992,12(1):1-17.[罗志立,龙学明.龙门山造山带的崛起和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].四川地质学报,1992,12(1):1-17.]
[26]Mei Mingxiang,Ma Yongsheng,Deng Jun,et al.Tectonic paleogeographic of Caledonian orogeny and the form of Yunnan,Guizhou & Guangxi basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12 (3):228-235.[梅冥相,马永生,邓军,等.加里东运动构造古地理及滇黔桂盆地的形成[J].地学前缘,2005,12 (3):228-235.]
[27]Niu Xinsheng,Feng Changmao,Liu Jin.Formation Mechanism and Time of Qianzhong Uplift[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2007,12(2):46-50.[牛新生,冯常茂,刘进.黔中隆起的形成时间及形成机制探讨[J].海相油气地质,2007,12(2):46-50.]
[28]Yin Hongfu,Wu Shunbao,Du Yuansheng,et al.South China defined as part of tethyan archipelagic ocean system[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,1999,24(1):1-12.[殷鸿福,吴顺宝,杜远生,等.华南是特提斯多岛洋体系的一部分[J],地球科学:中国地质大学学报,1999,24(1):1-12.]
[29]Hou Fanghao,Fang Shaoxian,Chen Jingshan,et al.Depositional model for Upper Paleozoic Marine Facies and Application for Oil & Gas Exploration of Southwest Rigion[M],Chengdu:Chengdu University of Science Press,1991:1-20.[侯方浩,方少仙,陈景山,等.西南地区上古生界海相碳酸盐岩沉积相模式及其在油气勘探中的应用[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1991:1-20].
[30]Chen Haihong,Sun Shu,Li Jiliang,et al.A preliminary study on tectonics of the Xuefeng mountains,Western Hunan[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,1993,28(3):201-210.[陈海泓,孙枢,李继亮,等.雪峰山大地构造的基本特征初探[J].地质科学,1993,28(3):201-210]
[31]Ding Daogui,Guo Tonglou,Liu Yunli,et al.Structural attribute of the Jiangnan-Xuefengshan beil,China:A discussion[J].Geological Bulletin of China,2007,26(7):801-809.[丁道桂,郭彤楼,刘运黎,等.对江南一雪峰带构造属性的讨论[J].地质通报,2007,26(7):801-809.]
[32]Hou Mingcai,Chen Hongde,Chen Anqing.Constraints of the Jiangnan-Xuefeng upheaval to the depositional system and paleogeography distribution of Southeast Sichuan-South Guizhou depression during Shiniulan Period[J].Journal of Chengdu University of technology:Science & Technology Edition,2010,37(4):395-400.[侯明才,陈洪德,陈安清.江南—雪峰隆起对川东南—黔南凹陷石牛栏期沉积古地理的制约[J],成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2010,37(4):395-400.]
[33]Wang Zhenghe,Tan Qinyin,He Li,et al.Deposition and sequence stratigraphy of the Silurian Shiniulan Formation in southeastern Sichuan-northern Guizhou province[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2013,34(4):499-507.[王正和,谭钦银,何利,等.川东南一黔北志留系石牛栏组沉积与层序地层[J],石油与天然气地质,2013,34(4):499-507.]
[34]Ma Dongzhou,Chen Hongde,Zhu Lidong,et al.Depositional system and lithofacies and paleogeography of the Silurian Shiniulan Formation in the southern Sichuan Basin,China[J],Journal of Chengdu University of technology:Science & Technology Edition,2006,33(3):228-232.[马东洲,陈洪德,朱利东,等.川南下志留统石牛栏组沉积体系与岩相古地理[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2006,33(3):228-232.]
[35]Guo Zhengwu,Deng Kangling,Han Yonghui,et al.Formation and Evolution of Sichuan Basin[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1996:1-102.[郭正吾,邓康龄,韩永辉,等.四川盆地形成与演化[M].北京:地质出版社,1996:1-102.]
[36]Huang Wenming,Liu Shugen,Xu Guoshen,et al.Characteristics of paleo oil pools from sinian to lower paleozoicin southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin[J].Geological Review,2011,57(2):285-299.[黄文明,刘树根,徐国盛,等.四川盆地东南缘震旦系-古生界古油藏特征[J].地质论评,2011,57(2):285-299.]
[37]Huang jizhong,The pros and cons of paleohighs for hydrocarbon reservoiring:A case study of the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas  Industry,2009,29(2):12-17.[黄籍中.从四川盆地看古隆起成藏的两重性[J].天然气工业,2009,29(2):12-17]
[38]Zhan Renwu,Liu Jianbo,Lan G P,et al.The evolution of the Yangtze region,Late Ordovician Shihe Hirnantia fauna southern Chinese time[J].Science in China:Earth Sciences.2010,40(9)1154-1163.[詹仁斌,刘建波,Lan G P,等.华南上扬子区晚奥陶世赫南特贝动物群的时空演变[J].中国科学:地球科学,2010,40(9)1154-1163]
[39]Rong Jiayu.Chinese Hirnantia fauna and on the boundary of Ordovician and Silurian[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,1979,3(1):1-31.[戎嘉余.中国的赫南特贝动物群(Hirnantia fauna)并论奥陶系与志留系的分界[J].地层学杂志,1979,3(1):1-31.][JP]
[40]Chen Xu,Rong Jiayu,Fan Junxuan,et al.The establishment of the global layer profile and point of the Upper Ordovician in Nantes[J].Journal of Stratigraphy,2006,30(4):289-305.[陈旭,戎嘉余,樊隽轩,等.奥陶系上统赫南特阶全球层型剖面和点位的建立[J].地层学杂志,2006,30(4):289-305.]

[1] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[2] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[3] 朱华, 杨光, 苑保国, 应丹琳, 戴鑫, 周红飞, 徐世琦, 谈健康. 四川盆地常规天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1475-1485.
[4] 陈双,黄海平,张博原,谢增业. 原油及源内残余沥青裂解成气差异及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1375-1384.
[5] 贾成业,贾爱林,韩品龙,王建君,袁贺,乔辉. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组优质页岩储层特征与开发评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1406-1415.
[6] 张建勇,倪新峰,吴兴宁,李文正,郝毅,陈娅娜,吕学菊,谷明峰,田瀚,朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
[7] 沈安江,陈娅娜,潘立银,王龙,佘敏. 四川盆地下寒武统龙王庙组沉积相与储层分布预测研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1176-1190.
[8] 张林,万玉金,杨洪志,苏云河,张满郎. 四川盆地高石梯构造灯影组四段溶蚀孔洞型储层类型及组合模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1191-1198.
[9] 翟秀芬,汪泽成,罗平,王铜山,石书缘,张洪. 四川盆地高石梯东部地区震旦系灯影组微生物白云岩储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1199-1210.
[10] 张光荣,张旋,喻颐,张红英,廖奇,张福宏,赵艾琳,梁瀚. 四川盆地深层海相碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层预测关键技术——以SN地区茅口组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1235-1242.
[11] 何治亮,胡宗全,聂海宽,李双建,许锦. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集特征与“建造—改造”评价思路[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 724-733.
[12] 朱彤,俞凌杰,王烽. 四川盆地海相、湖相页岩气形成条件对比及开发策略[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 633-641.
[13] 廖计华,王华,甘华军,孙鸣,王颖,蔡露露,郭帅,郭佳. 莺歌海盆地东方区中新统黄流组一段高精度层序地层特征与隐蔽油气藏预测[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 241-253.
[14] 康毅力,陈益滨,李相臣,游利军,陈明君. 页岩粒径对甲烷吸附性能影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(2): 272-279.
[15] 鲁新川,安永福,夏维民,胡子见,张顺存,史基安. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区侏罗系三工河组沉积微相特征及对储层的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1810-1820.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!