天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 天然气勘探 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和致密砂岩储层含气饱和度测井评价

尹帅，丁文龙，黄昌杰，肖子亢，周学慧   

  1. 1.中国地质大学能源学院，北京 100083；
    2.中国地质大学海相储层演化与油气富集机理教育部重点实验室，北京 100083；
    3.中国地质大学页岩气资源战略评价国土资源部重点实验室，北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-23 修回日期:2015-07-12 出版日期:2016-01-10 发布日期:2016-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 丁文龙(1965-)，男，河南南阳人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事石油构造分析与控油作用、非常规油气构造和裂缝及其与含气量关系研究与教学工作.E-mail：dingwenlong2006@126.com. E-mail:583018776@qq.com
  • 作者简介:尹帅(1989-)，男，山东新泰人，博士研究生，主要从事石油构造分析与控油作用、非常规油气构造和裂缝及其与含气量关系研究. E-mail：583018776@qq.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号：41372139；41072098)；国家科技重大专项专题(编号：2011ZX05018-001-002；2011ZX05009-002-205；2011ZX05033-004;2016ZX05046-003)联合资助.

Gas saturation logging evaluation of partially saturated tight sandstone reservoir

Yin Shuai，Ding Wen-long，Huang Chang-jie，Xiao Zi-kang，Zhou Xue-hui   

  1. 1.School of Energy Resources,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.Key Laboratory for Marine Reservoir Evolution and Hydrocarbon Abundance Mechanism,Ministry of Education,
    China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China;3.Key Laboratory for Shale Gas Exploitation and Assessment,
    Ministry of Land and Resources,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2015-02-23 Revised:2015-07-12 Online:2016-01-10 Published:2016-01-10

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

425

摘要：

川西须家河组致密砂岩储层经历了复杂沉积、成岩及构造演化过程，储层物性及含气性在纵横向上均具有较强的非均质性。加强致密储层含气饱和度(Sg)测井对比研究，对深入研究储层气水分布、寻找优质储层及井间含气性对比具有重要意义。基于常规及特殊测井资料，从电学及声学角度出发，分别基于Archie公式及三相Biot-type方程(TPE)对川西须家河组致密砂岩储层岩石含气饱和度进行精细测井解释。研究结果表明，当模型参数选取适当条件下，2种方法均可获得良好的评价效果；确定了电学Archie公式(及其修正公式)方法的Archie常数，可为同类研究提供参考，泥质含量对该方法评价效果具有一定影响。利用TPE对Sg进行测井解释时，通过自适应方法获取地层固结参数α值，发现α值与电阻率的对数值之间满足幂指数关系，利用该定量关系可以对地层α进行预测；TPE评价方法受泥质含量影响较小，但会受地层真实Sg的影响，当真实Sg低于60%时Sg预测效果较好，而高于此值时，预测结果略微偏低。由于高含气饱和度不是导致声波频散和衰减的主要原因，因此该现象与岩石自身因素，即基质矿物组成、内部颗粒微观接触型式及孔—裂隙结构等方面因素有关。基于以上认识，根据实际资料掌握程度，可以优选适当方法对非饱和致密砂岩储层Sg进行精细测井解释。

关键词: 致密砂岩, 含气饱和度, 测井评价, Archie公式, TPE, 电阻率, 泥质含量

Abstract:

The tight sandstone reservoir in the Xujiahe Formation of western Sichuan Basin has experienced a complex sedimentation,diagenesis and tectonic evolution process.The reservoir physical properties and hydrocarbon content have strong heterogeneity in both vertical and horizontal directions.Strengthening the logging contrast research of dense reservoir gas saturation has great significance for further study of gas and water distribution,looking for high quality reservoir,and contrast between interwell hydrocarbon showings.In this paper,based on the conventional and special logging data of tight sandstone reservoir,we made logging interpretation of gas saturation using the Archie formula and three-phase Biot-type equation (TPE) respectively.It showed that,when the selection of various parameters is appropriate,they can both achieve good evaluation effect.The value of undetermined constant of this tight sandstone reservoir using the Archie formula and its corrected formula can provide a reference for similar research.The effect of evaluation based on the electrical method is greatly influenced by the shale content.When making logging interpretation of gas saturation using the TPE method,obtaining the consolidation parameter α through adaptive method,we found that there’s good power relationship between α and the resistivity log,and we can use this formula to predict α .This acoustic evaluation method is seldom affected by the shale content,but it can be affected by the true gas saturation of formation.When the true gas saturation of formation is lower than 60%,the prediction effect was good,but when it is higher than this value,the prediction result is lower.Because that the high saturation is not the main reason for acoustic dispersion and attenuation,this phenomenon is mainly correlated with the rock itself,such as the matrix mineral composition,internal particles microscopic contact type and the pore-crack structure.Based on the above understanding,we can select appropriate method to make fine logging interpretation of partially saturated tight sandstone reservoir according to the master degree of actual data that we have got.

Key words: Tight sandstone, Gas saturation, Logging evaluation, Archie formula, TPE;Resistivity, Shale content

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2

[1]Rahim K I,Reza M H,Re za R,et al.Seismic inversion and attributes analysis for porosity evaluation of the tight gas sandstones of the Whicher range field in the Perth basin,Western Australia[J].Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2014,21:1073-1083.
[2]Lu Xuesong,Liu Shaobo,Li Wei,et al.Geological and resource evaluation in tight sandstone gas plays of low exploration degree:A case of Jurassic tight sandstone gas in east Kuqa Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):178-183.[鲁雪松,柳少波,李伟,等.低勘探程度致密砂岩气区地质和资源潜力评价——以库车东部侏罗系致密砂岩气为例[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):178-183.]
[3]Ursula I V,Jorge O.Artificial neuralnetworks applied to estimate permeability,porosity and intrinsic attenuation using seismic attributes and well-log data[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,2014,107:45-54.
[4]Ning Fulong,Wu Nengyou,Li Shi,et al.Estimation of in-situ mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments from well logging[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):542-547.
[5]Morteza A,Mat H Y,Gholamreza Z,et al.Introducing new method to improve log derived saturation estimation in tight shaly sandstones:A case study from Mesaverde tight gas reservoir[J].Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2012,92-93:132-142.
[6]Amie M L,Ronny H,Bryndzia L T.Evaluation of variable gas saturation on acoustic log data from the Haynesville shale gas play,NM Louisiana,USA[J].The Leading Edge,2011,30(3):300-310.
[7]Ali S.Ziarani,Roberto Aguilera.Pore-throat radius and tortuosity estimation from formation resistivity data for tight gas sandstone reservoirs[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,2012,83:65-73.
[8]Archie.The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics[J].Transaction of American Institute of Mining,Metallurgical,and Petroleum Engineers,1942,146:54-62.
[9]Worthington P F.The evolution of shaly-sand concepts in reservoir evaluation[J].The Log Analyst,1985,1:23-40.
[10]Rosepiler.Calculation and siginificance of water saturations in low porosity shaly gas sands[R]//Proceedings of the SPWLA 22nd Annual Logging Symposium.London:Society of Petrophysicists ＆ Well Log Analysts,1981.
[11]Kukal.A systematic approach for the effective log analysis of tight gas sands[D]//Proceedings of the SPE Unconventional Gas Recovery Symposium.New York:Society of Petroleum Engineerings of AIME,Pennsylvania,1984.
[12]Song Yanjie,Tang Xiaomin.General effective medium resistivity model of low resistance oil layer[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,2008,38(7):896-909.[宋延杰,唐晓敏.低阻油层通用有效介质电阻率模型[J].中国科学:地球科学,2008,38(7):896-909.]
[13]Lin Maojie,Zou Shaochun.Determining initial gas saturation of porosity gas reservoir usingcapillary pressure curve[J].Natural Gas Industry,1993,13(2):17-21.[林茂杰,邹绍春.用毛细管压力曲线确定孔隙型气藏的原始含气饱和度[J].天然气工业,1993,13(2):17-21.]
[14]Merkel,Gegg.NMR log/core data in tight gas sand petrophysical model development[R]//Proceedings of the 49th Annual Logging Symposium.Texas：Society of Petrophysicists ＆ Well Log Analysts,Austin,2008.
[15]Leclaire P,Cohen T F,Aguirre P J.Extension of Biot’s theory of wave propagation to frozen porous media[J].Journal of Acoustical Society of America,1994,96（6）:3753-3768.
[16]Wang Caizhi,Zhang Lijun.Model of gas saturation determination based on elastic modulus[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,34(5):598-602.[王才志,张丽君.基于地层弹性模量建立含气饱和度模型[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(5):598-602.]
[17]Yan Weilin,Tan Hao,Li Hongjuan.Study on the gas saturation computation model of neutral and basic volcanic rocks reservoir based on the conductive pore[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2011,41(3):915-919.[闫伟林,覃豪,李洪娟.基于导电孔隙的中基性火山岩储层含气饱和度解释模型[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2011,41(3):915-919.]
[18]Huang Daowu,Song Chunhua,Shen Xiaohong,et al.Amethod of pulse neutron capture logging to calculate gas saturation in low salinity formations and its application[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2007,19(3):169-171.[黄导武,宋春华,沈晓红,等.脉冲中子俘获测井求取低矿化度水地层含气饱和度方法研究及应用[J].中国海上油气,2007,19(3):169-171.]
[19]Xie Jinzhuang,Yang Jinghai,Song Yanjie.A fine evaluation method of shallow gas logging cased hole without open hole logging data[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(6):1140-1146.[谢进庄,杨景海,宋延杰.一种无完井资料过套管浅层气测井精细评价方法[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(6):1140-1146.]
[20]Gui Junchuan,Xia Hongquan,Zou Yong,et al.A new method to calculate the gas saturation of the sand and shale formations based on logging rock mechanics parameters[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2015,43(1):82-87.[桂俊川,夏宏泉,邹勇,等.基于测井岩石力学参数计算砂泥岩储层含气饱和度的新方法[J].石油钻探技术,2015,43(1):82-87.]
[21]Carcione J M,Tinivella U.Bottom simulating reflectors:seismic velocities and AVO effects[J].The Leading Edge,2000,65(1):54-67.
[22]Guan Ping.Theevolution of smectite to illite during diagenesis:A kinetic medel[J].Geochinica,1991,20(2):197-202.[关平.成岩作用中蒙皂石向伊利石转化的化学动力学模型及其意义[J].地球化学,1991,20(2):197-202.]
[23]Wei Wenwen,Huang Sijing,Huan Jinlai.Thermadynamic calculation of illite formation and its significance on research of sandstone diagenesis[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2011,30(1):20-24.[魏文文,黄思静,郇金来.伊利石形成相关反应的热力学计算及其对砂岩成岩作用研究的意义[J].地质科技情报,2011,30(1):20-24.]
[24]Abdullah M A,Eswaran P.Quartz surface morphology of Tertiary rocks from northeast Sarawak,Malaysia:Implications for paleo-depositional environment and reservoir rock quality predictions[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(6):1-8.[Abdullah M A,Eswaran P.马来西亚沙捞越东北部第三系石英表面形态特征[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(6):1-8.]
[25]John W.Snedden.Estimating effective shale area distributions from subsurface data[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2014,49:35-44.
[26]Robert A M,Guy G,Bruce E J.Physical criteria fordistinguishing sandy tsunami and storm deposits using modern examples[J].Sedimentary Geology,2007,200:184-207.
[27]Michael H S,Irfan U J,Sa’ad Z A,et al.Palynology and correlation of Carboniferous-Permian glacigene rocks in Oman,Yemen and Pakistan[J].Gondwana Reasearch,2013,24:203-211.
[28]Collett T S.Energy resource potential of natural gas hydrates[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1971-1992.
[29]Arp J J.The effect of temperature on the density and electrical resistivity of sodium chloride solutions[J].Petroleum Transaction,American Institute of Mining,Metallurgical,and Petroleum Engineering,1953,198:327-330.
[30]Collett T S.Energy research potential of natural gas hydrates[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(11):1971-1992.
[31]Lee M W,Collett T S.Integrated analysis of well logs and seismic data at the Keathley Canyon,Gulf of Mexico,for estimation of gas hydrate concentrations[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2008,25:924-931.
[32]Wyllie M R J,Southwick P F.An experimental investigation of the S.P.and resistivity phenomena in shaly sands[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1954,6:44-57.
[33]Lee M W,Collett T S.A method of shaly sand correction for estimating gas-hydrate saturations using downhole electrical resistivity log data[J].U.S.Geological Survey,2006:8-12.
[34]Li Hongbing,Zhang Jiajia.Elastic moduli of dry rocks containing spheroidal pores based on differential effective medium theory[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,2011,75:671-678.
[35]Lee M W,Waite W F.Estimating pore-space gas hydrate saturations from well-log acoustic data[J].Geochemistry,Geophysics,Geosystems,2008,9(7):9-10.
[36]Schlumberger Logging Company.Logging Interpretation Common Mineral Rock Handbook[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998.[斯伦贝谢测井公司.测井解释常用岩石矿物手册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.]
[37]Helgerud M B,Dvorkin J,Nur A,et al.Elastic-wave velocity in marine sediments with gas hydrates:Effective medium modeling[J].Geophysics Research Letter,1999,26(13):2021-2024.
[38]Sloan E D.Clathrate hydrate hydrates of natural gases[M].London:Taylor & Francies,Inc.,2007.
[39]Hu Yong,Li Xizhe,Lu Xiangguo,et al.The realization of the active mechanism between formation and water in tight sand gas reservoir with high water saturation[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1072-1075.[胡勇,李煕喆,卢祥国,等.高含水致密砂岩气藏储层与水作用机理[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1072-1075.]
[40]Wei Xian,Wang Shangxu,Zhao Jianguo,et al.Laboratory investigation of influence factors on Vp and Vs in tight sandstone[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2015,54(1):9-16.[未晛,王尚旭,赵建国,等.致密砂岩纵横比速度影响因素的实验研究[J].石油物探,2015,54(1):9-16.]
[41]Li Qi,Gao Shusheng,Yang Zhaopeng,et al.Influence of the threshold pressure gradient on tight sandstone gas reservoir recovery[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(9):1444-1449.[李奇,高树生,杨朝蓬,等.致密砂岩气藏阙压梯度对采收率的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(9):1444-1449.]
[42]Deng Jixin,Wang Shangxu,Du Wei.A study of the influence of mesoscopic pore fluid flow on the propagation properties of compressional wave-a case of periodic layered porous media[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2012,55(8):2716-2725.[邓继新,王尚旭,杜伟.介观尺度孔隙流体流动作用对纵波传播特征的影响研究-以周期性层状孔隙介质为例[J].地球物理学报,2012,55(8):2716-2725.]
[43]Tian Wei,Zhu Weiyao,Zhu Huayin,et al.The micro-structure and seepage characteristics of condensate gas reservoir for tight sandstone[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1077-1083.[田巍,朱维耀,朱华银,等.致密砂岩凝析气藏微观结构及渗流特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1077-1083.]
[44]Chandong Chang,Mark D.Zoback,Abbas Khaksar.Empirical relations between rock strength and physicalproperties in sedimentary rocks[J].Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering,2006,51:223-237.
[1] 朱立文，王震亮，张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[2] 杨海军，张荣虎，杨宪彰，王珂，王俊鹏，唐雁刚，周露. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝特征及其对储层的改造作用——以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 942-950.
[3] 游利军，王哲，康毅力，张杜杰. 致密砂岩孔渗对盐析的响应实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 866-872.
[4] 滕龙，殷启春，方朝刚，郑红军，沈雪华，朱红兵，陈基炜. 利用高密度电阻率法预测第四系浅层生物气——以江苏省南通地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 719-728.
[5] 葛岩，朱光辉，万欢，潘新志，黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[6] 赵力彬，张同辉，杨学君，郭小波，饶华文. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 500-509.
[7] 黄禹忠，刁素，栗铁峰，何红梅. 致密砂岩气藏压裂伤害及对策——以川西坳陷ZH构造JS12气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 579-585.
[8] 何文军，杨海波，费李莹，王学勇，杨彤远，杨翼波，鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[9] 高文杰，李贤庆，张光武，魏强，张吉振，祁帅，陈金明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气藏储层致密化与成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 226-235.
[10] 张艳，张春雷，高世臣. 基于SOM和HSV染色技术的致密砂岩储层地震相分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 259-267.
[11] 赵军, 曹刚, 武延亮. 多元隶属函数在致密砂岩储层分类中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1553-1558.
[12] 唐大海, 王小娟, 陈双玲, 吴长江, 杨广广, 温梦晗, 朱华. 四川盆地中台山地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏富集高产主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1575-1584.
[13] 印森林, 程乐利, 刘子雄, 陈玲, 陈恭洋, 冯伟, 罗迎春. 基于测录井曲线的致密砂岩储层产能评价方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1627-1638.
[14] 陈玉凤, 周雪冰, 梁德青, 吴能友. 沉积物中天然气水合物生成与分解过程的电阻率变化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(11): 1672-1678.
[15] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!