天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

川北米仓山地区震旦系灯影组差异化岩溶作用分析

李博媛,张殿伟,庞雄奇,胡方杰,朱东亚,张荣强   

  1. 1.中国石油大学地球科学学院,北京 102249;
    2.中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室,北京 102249;
    3.中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院沉积造储层实验室,北京 100083;
    4.中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆 库尔勒 841000
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-16 修回日期:2015-06-08 出版日期:2015-11-10 发布日期:2015-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 张殿伟(1977-),男,河北文安人,高级工程师,主要从事地球化学研究. E-mail:zhangdw.syky@sinopec.com.
  • 作者简介:李博媛(1990-),女,河北任丘人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气勘探与地质工程研究. E-mail:liboyuancup@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    中国早古生代海相碳酸盐岩层系大型油气田形成机理与分布规律(编号:2012CB214800)资助.

Differential Karstification Analysis of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Northern Sichuan

LI Bo-yuan,ZHANG Dian-wei,PANG Xiong-qi,,HU Fang-jie,ZHU Dong-ya,ZHANG Rong-qiang   

  1. 1.College of geosciences of China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China;2.State Key Laboratory of
    Petroleum Resources and Prospecting,China University of Petroleum,Beijing  102249,China;3.Laboratory of
    Sedimentary Structural Reservoir,Petroleum Exploration and Product Research Institute,SINOPEC,Beijing 100083,
    China;4.Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Tarim Oilfield Company,CNPC,Korla 841000,China
  • Received:2015-02-16 Revised:2015-06-08 Online:2015-11-10 Published:2015-11-10

摘要:

四川盆地灯影组以一套碳酸盐岩沉积为主,优质储层发育普遍受岩溶作用影响。川北米仓山地区早古生代为一个范围相对稳定且露出水面的陆地,在桐湾期与川中古隆起具有很好的可对比性。通过重点剖面碳、氧同位素特征分析及镜下观察,对灯影组二段和灯影组四段(下文简称“灯二段”和“灯四段”)不整合岩溶特征进行了系统对比。灯二段储层表现为葡萄状白云岩发育顺层、穿层溶蚀洞缝;而灯四段则以砂糖状白云岩晶间孔、藻纹层白云岩针状溶孔和角砾间孔隙为主,与前者相比灯四段表现为更多类型且更为发育的储集空间。灯二段、灯四段不整合面附近碳、氧同位素值由底及顶有逐渐变低的趋势,且灯四段白云岩碳、氧同位素值比灯二段整体较低,在纵向分布上更为偏负。综合说明了桐湾二幕较桐湾一幕构造抬升更为强烈,灯四段较灯二段受表生岩溶剥蚀影响更深,反映了桐湾运动不整合对灯影组储层发育起着主要控制作用。

关键词: 米仓山, 灯影组, 不整合, 岩溶, 碳、氧同位素

Abstract:

The Dengying Formation in the Sichuan Basin is mainly a set of carbonate sediments,in which the high quality reservoir development is generally controlled by karst effects.In the Early Paleozoic,Micangshan area of northern Sichuan was an exposed land which was relatively stable,and it had good correlation with paleo-uplift of central Sichuan in the Tongwan Period.In this paper,through the analysis of carbon and oxygen isotopic characteristics in the key sections and microscopic observation,we systematically compared the unconformity karst features between the 2nd and 4th members of Dengying Formation.The 2nd member reservoir is characterized by  grape-like dolomite which develops bedding,interspersed corrosion caves and fractures,while the 4thmember develops sugar-like dolomite intercrystal pores,algae laminae dolomite acicular dissolved pores and breccia pores.Compared with the former,the 4th member of Dengying Formation has more reservoir space types and they are more developed.Furthermore,carbon and oxygen isotopes near the unconformity of the two layers have a tendency to get lighter from bottom to top,and carbon and oxygen isotope value of the 4th member of Dengying Formation is overall lower than that in the second member,as well as more negative in the vertical distribution.Based on the characteristics above,we can summary that compared to the first period of Tongwan Movements,the second period of tectonic uplift is more strong,leading to deeper supergene karst erosion effect in the 4th member of Dengying Formation.As a result,it reflects that the unconformity of Tongwan Movements plays an important role in controlling the development of Dengying Formation reservoir.

Key words: Micangshan, Dengying Formation, Unconformity, Karst, Carbon and oxygen isotopes

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3

[1]Dai Hansong,Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,et al.Study on characteristics of Sinian-Silurian bitumen outcrops in the Longmenshan-Micangshan area,southwest China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2009,36(6):687-696.[代寒松,刘树根,孙玮,等.龙门山—米仓山地区下组合地表沥青特征研究[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,36(6):687-696.]
[2]Dai Hansong,Liu Shugen,Sun Wei,et al.Natural gas exploration prospects of Sinian system Dengying Formation in the front area of Micang mountain[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2010,32(5):16-26.[代寒松,刘树根,孙玮,等.米仓山前缘震旦系灯影组天然气勘探前景探讨[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2010,32(5):16-26.]
[3]Wang Xingzhi,Hou Fanghao,Huang Jixiang,et al.The formation and evolution of reservoir in Sinian Dengying Formation,Ziyang area,Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,1997,17(2):55-60.[王兴志,侯方浩,黄继祥,等.四川资阳地区灯影组储层的形成与演化[J].矿物岩石,1997,17(2):55-60.]
[4]Liu Shugen,Ma Yongsheng,Huang Wenming,et al.Densification process of upper Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(4):485-497.[刘树根,马永生,黄文明,等.四川盆地上震旦统灯影组储集层致密化过程研究[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(4):485-497.]
[5]Wang Xingzhi,Mu Shuguang,Fang Shaoxian,et al.The bank facies deposits and the reservoir characteristics in Dengying Formation,Ziyang Sichuan[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1999,17(4):578-583.[王兴志,穆曙光,方少仙,等.四川资阳地区灯影组滩相沉积及储集性研究[J].沉积学报,1999,17(4):578-583.]
[6]Chen Zongqing.Gas exploration in Sinian Dengying Formation,Sichuan Basin[J].China Petroleum Exploration,2010,(4):1-15.[陈宗清.四川盆地震旦系灯影组天然气勘探[J].中国石油勘探,2010,(4):1-15.]
[7]Wang Guozhi,Liu Shugen.Paleo-fluid geochemical evaluation of hydrocarbon preservation in marine carbonate rock areas:Taking lower association in central Sichuan Basin as an example[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2009,36(6):631-644.[王国芝,刘树根.海相碳酸盐岩区油气保存条件的古流体地球化学评价——以四川盆地中部下组合为例[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2009,36(6):631-644.]
[8]Liu Xiaoping,Wu Xinsong,Zhang Xiangzhong,et al.Geochemistry characteristics of carbon and oxygen isotopes of Ordovician carbonate palaeokarst reservoir in the western region of Lungu,Tarim Basin[J].Journal of Xi′an Shiyou University:Natural Science Edition,2004,19(4):69-71,76.[刘小平,吴欣松,张祥忠.轮古西地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩古岩溶储层碳、氧同位素地球化学特征[J].西安石油大学学报:自然科学版,2004,19(4):69-71,76.]
[9]Zheng Rongcai,Chen Hongde,Zhang Shaonan,et al.Stable isotopic characteristics of karst-reservoirs in Huanglong Formation from eastern Sichuan[J].Earth Science,1997,22(4):88-92.[郑荣才,陈洪德,张哨楠,等.川东黄龙组古岩溶储层的稳定同位素和流体性质[J].地球科学,1997,22(4):88-92.]
[10]Zheng Rongcai,Hu Zhonggui,Zheng Chao,et al.Geochemical characteristics of stable isotopes in paleokarst reservoirs in Huanglong Formation in northern Chongqing-eastern Sichuan area[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2008,15(6):303-311.[郑荣才,胡忠贵,郑超,等.渝北—川东地区黄龙组古岩溶储层稳定同位素地球化学特征[J].地学前缘,2008,15(6):303-311.]
[11]Wen Huaguo,Chen Haoru,Wen Longbin,et al.Diagenetic fluids of paleokarst reservoirs in Carboniferous from eastern Sichuan Basin:some evidences from fluid inclusion,trace element and C-O-Sr isotope[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2014,30(3):655-666.[文华国,陈浩如,温龙彬,等.四川盆地东部石炭系古岩溶储层成岩流体:来自流体包裹体、微量元素和C、O、Sr同位素的证据[J].岩石学报,2014,30(3):655-666.]
[12]Wei Xiangui,Du Siqing,He Zhengwei,et al.The tectonic evolution of Micangshan area[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Peteology,1997,17(supplement 1):110-116.[JP3][魏显贵,杜思清,何政伟,等.米仓山地区构造演化[J].矿物岩石,1997,17(增刊1):110-116.]
[13]Melim L A,Westphal H,Swart P K,et al.Questioning carbonate diagenetic paradigms:Evidence from the Neogene of the Bahamas[J].Marine Geology,2002,185:27-53.
[14]Zhang Jie,Brian Jones,Pan Liyin,et al.Origin of botryoidal dolostone of the Sinian Dengying Formation in Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2014,16(5):715-725.[张杰,Brian Jones,潘立银,等.四川盆地震旦系灯影组葡萄状白云岩成因[J].古地理学报,2014,16(5):715-725.]
[15]Chen Ming,Xu Xiaosong,Wan Fang,et al.Genesis and significance of grape-and show flake-shaped dolomite from Dengying Formation of Upper Sinian in Upper Yangtze platform region[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2002,22(4):33-37.[陈明,许效松,万方,等.上扬子台地晚震旦世灯影组中葡萄状—雪花状白云岩的成因意义[J].矿物岩石,2002,22(4):33-37.]
[16]Liu Huairen,Liu Mingxing,Hu Dengxin,et al.The exposure indicators formed during the deposition of the Upper Sinian Dengying formation in southwestern Sichuan and their significance[J].Sedimentary Facies and Palaeogeography,1991,(5):1-10.[刘怀仁,刘明星,胡登新,等.川西南上震旦统灯影组沉积期的暴露标志及其意义[J].岩相古地理,1991,(5):1-10.]
[17]Cao Renguan.The sedimentary environment of grapestone in Dengying Formation of Sinian system in Sichuan and Yunnan[J].Yunnan Geology,2002,21(2):208-213.[曹仁关.川滇震旦系灯影组葡萄石的沉积环境[J].云南地质,2002,21(2):208-213.]
[18]Zhang Yinben.Study on botryoidalis tectonic origin in Sinian dolomite[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,1980,2(4):40-43.[张荫本.震旦纪白云岩中的葡萄状构造成因初探[J].石油实验地质,1980,2(4):40-43.]
[19]Wang Zecheng,Jiang Hua,Wang Tongshan,et al.Paleo-geomorphology formed during Tongwan tectonization in Sichuan Basin and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2014,41(3):305-312.[汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312.]
[20]Xiang Fang,Chen Hongde,Zhang Jinquan.Paleokarst and its characteristics of Dengying Formation in Ziyang area[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2001,19(3):421-424.[向芳,陈洪德,张锦泉.资阳地区震旦系古岩溶作用及其特征讨论[J].沉积学报,2001,19(3):421-424.]
[21]Liu Lihong,Huang Sijing,Wang Chunlian,et al.Cathodolumines Zonal texture of Calcite cement in Carbonate rock and its relationship with trace element composition:A case of Ordovician carbonate rock of Tahe Oilfield,Tarim Basin[J].Marine Origin Petroleum Geology,2010,15(1):55-61.[刘丽红,黄思静,王春连,等.碳酸盐岩中方解石胶结物的阴极发光环带与微量元素构成的关系——以塔河油田奥陶系碳酸盐岩为例[J].海相油气地质,2010,15(1):55-61.]
[22]Yi Haisheng,Chen Zhiyong,Ji Changjun,et al.New evidence for deep burial origin of sucrosic dolomites from Middle Jurrasic Buqu Formation in southern Qiangtang Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinica,2014,30(3):737-746.[伊海生,陈志勇,季长军,等.羌塘盆地南部地区布曲组砂糖状白云岩埋藏成因的新证据[J].岩石学报,2014,30(3):737-746.]
[23]Liu Yongfu,Yin Jun,Sun Xiongwei,et al.Cambrian sedimentary characteristics and origin of high-quality dolomite reservoirs in eastern Tarim Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(1):126-132.[刘永福,殷军,孙雄伟,等.塔里木盆地东部寒武系沉积特征及优质白云岩储层成因[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):126-132.]
[24]Hu Mingyi,Li Jianming,Qu Yonghong,et al.Reservior and diagenesis characteristics of Dengying Formation (Upper Sinian) in Suizhou,Hubei[J].Journal Of Jianghan Petroleum Institute,1997,19(1):3-8.[胡明毅,李建明,翟永红,等.湖北随州上震旦统灯影组白云岩成岩作用及储层特征[J].江汉石油学院学报,1997,19(1):3-8.]
[25]Machel H G.Chemistry and environments of dolomitization-areappraisal[J].Earth-Science Reviews,1986,23:175-222.

[1] 张林,万玉金,杨洪志,苏云河,张满郎. 四川盆地高石梯构造灯影组四段溶蚀孔洞型储层类型及组合模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1191-1198.
[2] 翟秀芬,汪泽成,罗平,王铜山,石书缘,张洪. 四川盆地高石梯东部地区震旦系灯影组微生物白云岩储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1199-1210.
[3] 丁博钊,张光荣,陈康,耿玮,朱兴卉,范畅. 四川盆地高石梯地区震旦系岩溶塌陷储集体成因及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1211-1218.
[4] 杨瑞召,金圣林,杨敏,罗誉鑫,孟张武,邓丽君. 塔里木盆地塔河油田不同岩溶塌陷类型地震响应特征与识别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 391-396.
[5] 韩宝,王昌伟,盛世锋,庞燕青. 准噶尔盆地中拐—五区二叠系不整合面对油气成藏控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1821-1828.
[6] 焦伟伟,汪生秀,程礼军,罗情勇,方光建. 渝东南地区下寒武统页岩气高氮低烃成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1882-1890.
[7] 王建民,王佳媛. 古岩溶地貌与古岩溶储层岩溶效应分析——以鄂尔多斯盆地东部奥陶系风化壳为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(8): 1388-1398.
[8] 韩长城,林承焰,任丽华,鲁新便,魏婷,张宪国. 塔里木盆地塔河10区奥陶系断裂特征及对岩溶储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(5): 790-798.
[9] 高长海,查明,陈力,赵贤正,金凤鸣. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷大柳泉构造不整合输导油气能力的定量表征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 619-627.
[10] 王琪,许勇,刘新社,马东旭,马晓峰,李树同. 岩溶背景下的优质天然气储层形成机理及主控因素——以鄂尔多斯盆地奥陶系马家沟组马五41储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(12): 2103-2114.
[11] 张德民,鲍志东,郝雁,杨飞,陈敏,仲向云. 塔里木盆地牙哈_英买力寒武系潜山区优质储层形成模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(10): 1797-1807.
[12] 张道锋,刘新社,高星,崔子岳,闫小雄. 鄂尔多斯盆地西部奥陶系海相碳酸盐岩地质特征与成藏模式研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 92-101.
[13] 张存,胡有福,陈军,于金星,齐凤林,蒋其君. WEFOX叠前成像技术及其在塔里木盆地塔中地区岩溶缝洞储层中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S2): 158-164.
[14] 王宏斌,张虎权,杨丽莎,郑多明,姚清洲,代冬冬. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区潜山岩溶带油气成藏关键因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S1): 72-79.
[15] 孟祥霞,王宏斌,姚清洲,余建平,代冬冬,杨丽莎. 塔北隆起构造演化特征及对奥陶系碳酸盐岩的控储控藏作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(S1): 109-120.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!