天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏里格气田强非均质性致密气藏水平井产能评价

李波,贾爱林,何东博,吕志凯,甯波,冀光   

  1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京  100083
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-19 修回日期:2014-09-16 出版日期:2015-03-10 发布日期:2015-03-10
  • 作者简介:李波(1985-),男,贵州思南人,博士研究生,主要从事气藏工程与多相管流研究.E-mail:libosonova@163.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”《天然气开发关键技术研究》(编号:2011ZX05015) 资助.
     

Productivity Evaluation of Horizontal Wells in Sulige Tight Gas Reservoir with Strong Heterogeneity

LI Bo,JIA Ai-lin,HE Dong-bo,LV  Zhi-kai,NING Bo,JI Guang   

  1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2014-08-19 Revised:2014-09-16 Online:2015-03-10 Published:2015-03-10

摘要:

水平井开发在苏里格气田取得了良好应用效果,但存在产能评价困难与产能影响因素不明确的实际问题。在分析已有资料基础上,建立了水平井“一点法”无阻流量计算公式与单井控制储量快速评价图版,评价了气田早期投产水平井产能,并通过定义单条裂缝产能参数和单位气层厚度产能参数分析了水平井产能主要影响因素。结果表明,苏里格气田储层物性差、非均质性强,水平井需要(100~600)d才能进入边界控制流动阶段;水平井产能总体较高,但差异较大,无阻流量集中分布在(10~50)×104m3/d之间,平均值为25.7×104m3/d,单井控制储量主要分布在(4 000~8 000)×104m3之间,平均值为7 784×104m3。水平井产能同时受地质和工程因素影响,地质因素中气层厚度对产能影响最明显,含气饱和度次之,孔隙度影响不明显,渗透率影响程度难以确定;工程因素中水平井有效长度、压裂段数、压裂规模对产能影响明显,压裂液返排率影响不明显。
 

关键词: 水平井, 苏里格气田, 非均质性, 产能, 生产动态, 影响因素

Abstract:

While horizontal wells(HWs)development have achieved excellent performance in Sulige Gasfield,there exist practical problems including difficulty in productivity evaluation and uncertainty in determining effect factors of productivity.Based on the analyses of previous materials and data of field,this paper proposed an absolute open flow single-point equation and rapid well-controlled reserves evaluation chart for HWs and evaluated productivity of early production wells.Then main effect factors of productivity are filtered by defining productivity parameters of single fracture and unit formation thickness.Results show that it takes 100 to 600 days for horizontal wells to enter the boundary controlled flow period due to poor properties and strong heterogeneity of Sulige tight gas field.The absolute open flow rate of wells concentrates between 10×104m3/d and 50×104m3/d with an average of 25.7×104m3/d.The well-controlled reserves of HWs range from 4 000×104m3 to 8 000×104m3 with an average of 7 784×104m3.The production capacity of horizontal well is high though it shows great difference for individual wells.Both geological and engineering factors affect HWS productivity.Specifically,the most influential geological factor is formation thickness,then,is gas saturation.The effect of porosity is slight and that of permeability is difficult to determine.Among engineering factors,effective length of horizontal wells,fracturing segments,and fracturing scale affect productivity more greatly than flowing back ratio of fracturing fluid.

Key words: Horizontal wells, Sulige Gasfield, Heterogeneity, Productivity, Dynamic performance, Effect factors

中图分类号: 

  • TE357.1

[1]Lu Tao,Zhang Ji,Li Yuegang,et al.Horizontal well development technology for tight sand stone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(8):38-43.[卢涛,张吉,李跃刚,等.苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏水平井开发技术及展望[J].天然气工业,2013,33(8):38-43.] 
[2]Dai Jinxing,Ni Yunyan,Wu Xiaoqi.Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,201,39(3):257-264.[戴金星,倪云燕,吴小奇.中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J].石油勘探与开发,201,39(3):257-264.]
[3]Dai Jinxing,Ni Yunyan,Huang Shipeng,et al.Significant function of coal-derived gas study for natural gas industry development in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(1):1-22.[戴金星,倪云燕,黄士鹏,等.煤成气研究对中国天然气工业发展的重要意义[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(1):1-22.]
[4]Li Jianzhong,Guo Bincheng,Zheng Min,et al.Main types,geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,201,23(4):607-615.[李建忠,郭彬程,郑民,等.中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,201,23(4):607-615.]
[5]Ma Xinhua,Jia Ailin,Tan Jian.Tight sand gas development technologies and practices in China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,201,39(5):572-579.[马新华,贾爱林,谭健,等.中国致密砂岩气开发工程技术与实践[J].石油勘探与开发,201,39(5):572-579.]
[6]Zhang Minglu,Fan Youhong,He Guanghuai,et al.Latest progress in development technologies for low-permeability gas reservoirs in the Changqing gas zone[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(8):1-7.[JP3][张明禄,樊友宏,何光怀,等.长庆气区低渗透气藏开发技术新进展及攻关方向[J].天然气工业,2013,33(8):1-7.]
[7]Yang Zhilun,Zhao Weilan,Chen Qiwen,et al.High efficiency and productivity technology for horizontal wells in the Sulige Gasfield,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(8):44-48.[杨志伦,赵伟兰,陈启文,等.苏里格气田水平井高效建产技术[J].天然气工业,2013,33(8):44-48.]
[8]Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Wu Songtao,et al.Types,characteristics,genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations:Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J].Acta  Petroleum  Sinica,201,33(2):173-187.[邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J].石油学报,201,33(2):173-187.]
[9]He Dongbo,Jia Ailin,Ji Guang,et al.Well type and pattern optimization technology for large scale tight sand gas,Sulige Gasfield[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(1):79-89.[何东博,贾爱林,冀光,等.苏里格大型致密砂岩气田开发井型井网技术[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):79-89.]
[10]Li  Zhongping,Liu Zhengzhong,Xie Feng,et al.Impacting factors and development methods of hard-to-recover reserves in compacted sandstone gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Industry,2007,27(3):1-3.[李忠平,刘正中,谢峰.致密砂岩气藏难动用储量影响因素及其开发对策[J].天然气工业,2007,27(3):1-3.]
[11]Joshi S.D.Augmentation of Well Productivity Using Slant and Horizontal Wells[C].SPE 15375,1998:731-734.
[12]Lang Zhaoxing,Zhang Lihua,Cheng Linsong.Investigation on productivity of fractured horizontal well[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China,1994,18(2):43-46.[郎兆新,张丽华,程林松.压裂水平井产能研究[J].石油大学学报,1994,18(2):43-46.]
[13]Fan Zifei,Fang Hongchang,Niu Xinnian.A steady solution formula of horizontal well productivity in a fractured reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1996,23(3):52-57.[范子菲,方宏长,牛新年.裂缝性油藏水平井稳态解产能公式研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(3):52-57.]
[14]Han Shugang,Cheng Linsong,Ning Zhengfu.A new method for predicting productivity of fractured horizontal wells in gas reservoir[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum:Edition of Natural Science,200,26(4):36-39.[韩树刚,程林松,宁正福.气藏压裂水平井产能预测新方法[J].石油大学学报:自然科学版,200,26(4):36-39.]
[15]Li Tingli,Li Chunlan,Wu Ying,et al.A new way to calculate fractured horizontal wells productivity in low permeability oil reservoirs[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2006,30(2):48-52.[李廷礼,李春兰,吴英,等.低渗透油藏压裂水平井产能计算新方法[J].中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(2):48-52.]
[16]Zeng Fanhui,Guo Jianchun,Xu Yanbo,et al.Factors affecting production capacity of fractured horizontal wells[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2007,8(4):474-477.[曾凡辉,郭建春,徐严波,等.压裂水平井产能影响因素[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,8(4):474-477.]
[17]Wang Zhiping,Zhu Weiyao,Yue Ming,et al.A method to predict the production of fractured horizontal wells in low/ultra-low permeability reservoirs[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing,201,34(7):750-754.[王志平,朱维耀,岳明,等.低、特低渗透油藏压裂水平井产能计算方法[J].北京科技大学学报,201,34(7):750-754.]
[18]Xiong Jun,He Hanping,Xiong Youming,et al.Production preditction of partially completed horizontal well in gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):278-285.[熊军,何汉平,熊友明,等.气藏水平井分段完井产能预测[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):278-285.]
[19]Arps J J.Analysis of decline curves[J].Transactions of the AIME,1945,160(1):228-247.
[20]Mattar L,McNeil R.The “flowing” gas material balance[J].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology,1998,37(2):52-55.
[21]Fetkovich M J,Fetkovich E J,Fetkovich M D.Useful concepts for decline curve forecasting,reserve estimation,and analysis[J].SPE Reservoir Engineering,1996,11(1):13-22.
[22]Blasingame T A,Johnston J L,Lee W J.Type-curve Analysis Using the Pressure Integral Method[C].SPE 18799,1989.
[23]Agarwal R G,Gardner D C,Kleinsteiber S W,et al.Analyzing well production data using combined type curve and decline curve analysis concepts[J].SPE R & E,1999,2(5):478-485.
[24]Feng Xi,He Wei,Xu Qingyong.Heterogeneous gas reservoir development early dynamic reserves calculation problem analysis[J].Natural Gas Industry,200,22(supplement):87-90.[冯曦,贺伟,许清勇.非均质气藏开发早期动态储量计算问题分析[J].天然气工业,200,22(增刊):87-90.]
[25]Hao Yuhong,Xu Min,Xu Xiaorong.Accurately calculating dynamic reserves of low-permeability gas reservoir[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,200,29(5):66-68.[郝玉鸿,许敏,徐小蓉.正确计算低渗透气藏的动态储量[J].石油勘探与开发,200,29(5):66-68.]
[26]Liu Xiaohua.A discussion on several key parameters of gas reservoir dynamic reserves calculation[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(9):71-75.[刘晓华.气藏动态储量计算中的几个关键参数探讨[J].天然气工业,2009,29(9):71-75.]
[27]Wei Yunsheng,He Dongbo,Ji Guang.Optimization on horizontal well length in the Sulige type tight sand gas reservoir[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,23(4):775-779.[位云生,何东博,冀光,等.苏里格型致密砂岩气藏水平井长度优化[J].天然气地球科学,2013,23(4):775-779.]
[28]Wang Junlei,Jia Ailin,He Dongbo,et al.Rate decline of multiple fractured horizontal well and influence factors on productivity in tight gas reservors[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):278-285.[王军磊,贾爱林,何东博,等.致密气藏分段压裂水平井产量递减规律及影响因素[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):278-285.]
[29]Jiang Hanqiao,Yao Jun,Jiang Ruizhong.Principle and Method of Reservoir Engineering[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2006.[姜汉桥,姚军,姜瑞忠.油藏工程原理与方法[M].东营:中国石油大学出版社,2006.]
[30]Zhuang Huinong.Gas Reservoir Dynamic Description and Well Testing[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003.[庄惠农.气藏动态描述和试井[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003.]

[1] 崔明明,王宗秀,樊爱萍,高万里. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田西南部地层水特征与气水关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1364-1375.
[2] 任茜莹,代金友,穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376-1382.
[3] 李滔,李闽,张烈辉,田山川,赵潇雨,郑玲丽. 微多孔介质迂曲度与孔隙结构关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1181-1189.
[4] 黄雨,李晓平,谭晓华. 三重介质复合气藏水平井不稳定产量递减动态分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1190-1197.
[5] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[6] 朱维耀,马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[7] 吕志凯,贾爱林,唐海发,刘群明,王泽龙. 大型致密砂岩气藏水平井产能评价与新认识[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 873-879.
[8] 汪道兵,葛洪魁,宇波,文东升,周珺,韩东旭,刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[9] 翁定为,付海峰,包力庆,胥云, 梁天成,张金. 水平井平面射孔实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 572-578.
[10] 段毅,吴应忠,赵阳,曹喜喜,马兰花. 草本沼泽泥炭加水热解产物烃类气体氢同位素特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 305-310.
[11] 孟凡坤,雷群,徐伟,何东博,闫海军,邓惠. 应力敏感碳酸盐岩复合气藏生产动态特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 429-436.
[12] 卢文涛,李继庆,郑爱维,梁榜,张谦,杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
[13] 巫修平,张群. 碎软低渗煤层顶板水平井分段压裂裂缝扩展规律及控制机制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 268-276.
[14] 左罗,蒋廷学,罗莉涛,吴魏,赵昆. 基于渗流新模型分析页岩气流动影响因素及规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 296-304.
[15] 梁榜,李继庆,郑爱维,卢文涛,张谦. 涪陵页岩气田水平井开发效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 289-295.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!