天然气地球科学

• 天然气开发 • 上一篇    下一篇

回压应力敏感性评价测试方法研究

田巍,朱维耀,朱华银,张雪龄,王瑞明,李勇   

  1. 1.北京科技大学土木与环境工程学院,北京 100083;2.中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院,河北  廊坊 065007;
    3.华北油田勘探开发研究院,河北  任丘 062552
  • 收稿日期:2014-06-30 修回日期:2014-09-29 出版日期:2015-02-10 发布日期:2015-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 朱维耀(1960-),男,辽宁沈阳人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事渗流流体力学和油气田开发研究. E-mail:Weiyaook@sina.com.
  • 作者简介:田巍(1981-),男,河南太康人,工程师,博士,主要从事油气田开发、三次采油技术等研究. E-mail:tw811227@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”)(编号:2013CB228002) 资助.

     

     

     

     

Study on Testing Method of Back-pressure Stress Sensitivity Evaluation

TIAN Wei,ZHU Wei-yao,ZHU Hua-yin,ZHANG Xue-ling,WANG Rui-ming,LI Yong   

  1.  1.School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,University of Science and Technology Beijing,Beijing 100083,China;2.Langfang Branch,PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development,Langfang 065007,China;3.Institute of Exploration and Development,Huabei Oilfield,Renqiu 062552,China)
  • Received:2014-06-30 Revised:2014-09-29 Online:2015-02-10 Published:2015-02-10

摘要:

为了寻求回压应力敏感性评价合理的测定方法,对现行部颁标准中的方法进行详细分析,并指出其存在的问题,分析认为:现行部颁标准和原标准相比有改进,但仍不具体,仅对围压作了规定,测定结果不能排除净围压变化的影响,在气藏实际开采过程中,井底压力降低导致的有效应力变化由近井地带向远处延伸,并在压降漏斗控制下越来越弱。基于上述分析,设计出一套测定回压应力敏感性的方法,该方法要求围压和上游压力恒定,并分别等于实际储层上覆压力和原始地层压力,回压从原始地层压力降低至废弃压力,分别测定各回压下渗透率变化情况,通过将该方法应用到致密砂岩,测得渗透率伤害率为21%左右,弱敏感,实验曲线分为陡峭段和平缓段,存在拐点,测定结果符合预期,可以将该方法推广到以后的实验和研究中。
 

关键词: 评价, 回压, 应力敏感, 净应力, 上覆压力, 渗透率变化率

Abstract:

In order to seek for a set of reasonable measurement method for evaluation of back pressure stress sensitivity,current national standards are analyzed and the deficiencies are pointed out.The results show that the current national standard is not concrete although it is advanced compared with the original standard.It demands a constant confining pressure during the measurement process,but did not mention how to control the inlet pressure.The experiment simulated reservoir conditions well.According to the national standard definition for the net confining pressure and net stress,it can be speculated that inlet pressure changed with the changes of back pressure,but there is no confinement for pressure differential between upstream and downstream.A simple experiment is designed for inner pressure,it indicates the measurement process is simultaneously affected by the confining pressure and the back pressure.The current exploration are mostly devoted to the back pressure stress sensitivity considering the inner pressure changes,but it cannot well simulate the actual development process of gas reservoir.The actual situation is that the effective stress increases in the near oil wellbore area as the production well bottom pressure decreases,and extend into far wellbore area.This trend becomes weaker from the near to the distant due to the existence of pressure drop funnel.Based on the above analysis,a new set of measurement method for back pressure stress sensitivity is established,which required a constant confining pressure and upstream pressure.These pressure should equal to the overlying pressure and the original reservoir pressure of the actual reservoir respectively.The back pressure decreases from the original reservoir pressure to abandonment pressure points,which simulates the back pressure reduction process in the actual gas reservoirs development.The permeability is measured under different back pressure.This method is applied to measure the permeability of tight sandstone in Tuha oil field.The result shows that the permeability variation amplitude is about 21%,and the sensitivity degree is weak.The experimental permeability change rate curve is divided into steep section and gentle section,and a inflection point obviously existed.The measurement results agree well with expectations,so this new method can be applied to future tests and scientific research.
 
 

Key words: Evaluation, Back pressure, Stress sensitivity, Net stress, The overlying pressure, The change rate of permeability

中图分类号: 

  • TE37
[1]Zhu Huayin,Jiang Desheng,An Laizhi,et al.An experimental analysis of sensitivity of the Jiulongshan conglomerate reservoirs in west Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(9):40-43.[朱华银,蒋德生,安来志,等.川西地区九龙山构造砾岩储层敏感性实验分析[J].天然气工业,2012,32(9):40-43.]
[2]Li Chuanliang.Evaluation method for stress sensitivity of reservoir rock[J].Petroleum Geology & Oil Field Development in Daqing,2006,25(1):40-42.[李传亮.储层岩石的应力敏感性评价方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(1):40-42.]
[3]Li Lezhong,Li Xiangfang.Error analysis of experimental evaluation methods for stress sensitivity of reservoir[J].Natural Gas Industry,2013,33(2):48-51.[李乐忠,李相方.储层应力敏感实验评价方法的误差分析[J].天然气工业,2013,33(2):48-51.]
[4]Li Min,Qiao Guoan,Chen Hao.Experimental and theoretical study on rock stress sensitivity in low permeability sandstone[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2006,29(4):91-93.[李闽,乔国安,陈昊.低渗砂岩储层岩石应力敏感实验与理论研究[J].钻采工艺,2006,29(4):91-93.]
[5]Ren Heai,Zhao Shixu,Li Chengfu,et al.Experiment evaluation of stress sensitivity of Low-Permeability sandstone to confining pressure[J].Marine Geology Frontier,2012,28(6):60-64.[任和爱,赵世旭,李成福,等.低渗砂岩的变围压应力敏感性实验评价[J].海洋地质前沿,2012,28(6):60-64.]
[6]Liu Zhongqun,Li Lijun,Wang Nianxi,et al.Laboratory study on the stress sensitivity in EB tight rock[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2008,31(5):86-89.[刘忠群,李丽君,王念喜,等.鄂北低渗致密砂岩应力敏感性实验研究[J].钻采工艺,2008,31(5):86-89.]
[7]Zhu He,Wang Jia,Shi Kun,et al.Experimental study on pressure-sensibility of fractured shale reservoir[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(35):8862-8864.[朱贺,汪佳,施坤,等.泥岩裂缝性储层应力敏感性实验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2011,11(35):8862-8864.]
[8]He Jingang,Kang Yili,You Lijun,et al.Effects of Mineral com- position and microstructure on stress sensitivity of mudrocks[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(1):129-134.[何金钢,康毅力,游利军,等.矿物成分和微结构对泥质岩储层应力敏感性的影响[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(1):129-134.]
[9]Kang Yili,Zhang Hao,Chen Yijian,et al.Comprehensive research of tight sandstones gas reservoirs stress sensitivity in Daniudi  Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(3):335-338.[康毅力,张浩,陈一健,等.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田致密砂岩气层应力敏感性综合研究[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(3):335-338.]
[10]Zhou Sibin,Bai Ling.Chang 8 ultra low permeability reservoir stress sensitivity lab experiment in Zhenjiang Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2012,26(4):110-112.[周思宾,白玲.镇泾油田长8超低渗油藏应力敏感性实验研究[J].石油地质与工程,2012,26(4):110-112.]
[11]Yang Chaopeng,Gao Shusheng,Guo Lihui,et al.Effect of stress sensitivity on well productivity in tight gas reservoir[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2013,36(2): 58-61.[杨朝蓬,高树生,郭立辉,等.致密砂岩气藏应力敏感性及其对产能的影响[J].钻采工艺,2013,36(2):58-61.]
[12]Li Chuanliang.A study on the str ess sensibility of permea- bility of reservoir rocks[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2006,27(3):348-350.[李传亮.渗透率的应力敏感性分析方法[J].新疆石油地质,2006,27(3):348-350.]
[13]Wang Ruifei,Duan Yu′an,Lü Xinhua,et al.Stress sensitivity experiment of sandstone reservoirs in deep section with high pressure and low-permeability[J].Geological Science and Technology Information,2014,33(1):90-94.[王瑞飞,段雨安,吕新华,等.深层高压低渗砂岩油藏应力敏感性实验[J].地质科技情报,2014,33(1):90-94.]
[14]Zhang Li,Zhang Maolin,Mei Haiyan.Influence of stress sensibility on low permeability gas reservoir in different production methods[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2007,14(2):53-55.[张李,张茂林,梅海燕.不同开采方式下应力敏感对低渗气藏的影响[J].断块油气田,2007,14(2):53-55.]
[15]Jiao Chunyan,He Shunli,Xie Quan,et al.An experimental study on stress dependent sensitivity of ultra-low permeability sandstone reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2011,32(3):489-494.[焦春艳,何顺利,谢全,等.超低渗透砂岩储层应力敏感性实验[J].石油学报,2011,32(3):489-494.]
[16]Guo Ping,Deng Lei,Liu Qiguo,et al.Test and application of multiple stress sensitivity of low permeability gas reservoir[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2008,30(2):78-82.[郭平,邓垒,刘启国,等.低渗气藏多次应力敏感测试及应用[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2008,30(2):78-82.]
[17]Zhang Li,Zhang Maolin,Mei Haiyan,et al.Stress sensibility analysis of low permeability gas reservoir and its influence on exploitation[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2007,14(3):55-58.[张李,张茂林,梅海燕,等.低渗透气藏应力敏感性分析及对开采的影响[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(3):55-58.]
[18]Xiao Wenlian,Li Min,Zhao Jinzhou,et al.Laboratory study of stress sensitivity to permeability in tight sandstone[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2010,31(3):775-779.[肖文联,李 闽,赵金洲,等.低渗致密砂岩渗透率应力敏感性实验研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(3):775-779.]
[19]Wang Haiyang,Yang Shenglai,Li Wuguang,et al.Study on stress sensitivity of deep dual media tight gas reservoir and its application[J].Natural Gas and Oil,2013,31(4):51-56.[王海洋,杨胜来,李武广,等.深层致密双重介质气藏应力敏感研究及应用[J].天然气与石油,2013,31(4):51-56.]
[20]Song Chuanzhen,Zheng Rongchen.Stress sensitivity of low permeability tight gas reservoir and its effect on single well productivity[J].Petroleum Geology & Oil Field Development in Daqing,2006,25(6):47-49.[宋传真,郑荣臣.致密低渗气藏储层应力敏感性及其对单井产能的影响[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2006,25(6):47-49.]
[21]Guo Ping,Zhang Jun,Du Jianfen,et al.Study on Core Stress sensitivity for gas reservoir with two experiment method[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2007,29(2):7-9.[郭平,张俊,杜建芬,等.采用两种实验方法进行气藏岩芯应力敏感研究[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(2):7-9.]
[22]Sun Linjun,Peng Chao,Bai Yang,et al.The influence of stress sensitive to fractured gas reservoir production of high temperature and pressure[J].University of science and technology Chongqing: Science & Technology Edition,2013,15(1):64-67.[孙琳钧,彭超,白杨,等.应力敏感对裂缝性高温高压气藏产能的影响[J].重庆科技学院学报:自然科学版,2013,15(1):64-67.]
[23]Jones J R.A laboratory study of the effect of confining pressure on fracture flow and storage capacity in carbonate rock[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1975:21-27.
[24]Zhang Haiyong,He Shunli,Gu Daihong,et al.The effect of pore pressure on the media deformation of micro-crack low permeability reservoir[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(11):22-26.[张海勇,何顺利,顾岱鸿,等.孔隙压力对微裂隙低渗透介质变形的影响实验研究[J].科学技术与工程,2014,14(11):22-26.]
[25]Li Daqi,Kang Yili,You Lijun.Experimental study on permeability stress sensitivity of carbonate rocks[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(3):409-413.[李大奇,康毅力,游利军.碳酸盐岩储层渗透率应力敏感性实验研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(3):409-413.]
[26]Li Min,Xiao Wenlian,Zhao Chunlan,et al.Net stress can not be used to evaluate the stress sensitivity in the low permeability sandstone[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University :Science & Technology Edition,2009,31(5):183-186.[李闽,肖文联,赵春兰,等.不能用净应力评价低渗砂岩岩石应力敏感性[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2009,31(5):183-186.]
[27]National Energy Board.SY/T5358-2010.Formation Damage Evaluation by Flow Test[S].Beijing:China Standards Press,2010:18-21.[国家能源局.SY/T5358-2010储层敏感性流动实验评价方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010:18-21.]
[28]Tian Wei,Zhu Weiyao,Zhu Huayin,et al.the selection of Confining pressure mode in starting pressure test for tight sandstone[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2014,21(2):107-110.[田巍,朱维耀,朱华银,等.致密砂岩启动压力测试中围压模式的优选[J].特种油气藏,2014,21(2):107-110.]
[29]Tian Wei,Zhu Weiyao,Zhu Huayin,et al.The micro-structure and seepage characteristics of condensate gas reservoir for tight sandstone[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(7):1077-1084.[田巍,朱维耀,朱华银,等.致密砂岩凝析气藏微观结构及渗流特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(7):1077-1084.]
 
[1] 程鸣,傅雪海,张苗,程维平,渠丽珍. 沁水盆地古县区块煤系“三气”储层覆压孔渗实验对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1163-1171.
[2] 苏佳纯,张金川,朱伟林. 非常规天然气经济评价对策思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 743-753.
[3] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[4] 史文洋,姚约东,程时清,石志良,高敏. 裂缝性低渗透碳酸盐岩储层酸压改造油井动态压力特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 586-596.
[5] 何文军,杨海波,费李莹,王学勇,杨彤远,杨翼波,鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[6] 孟凡坤,雷群,徐伟,何东博,闫海军,邓惠. 应力敏感碳酸盐岩复合气藏生产动态特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 429-436.
[7] 梁榜,李继庆,郑爱维,卢文涛,张谦. 涪陵页岩气田水平井开发效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 289-295.
[8] 黄少英, 杨文静, 卢玉红, 张科, 赵青, 凡闪. 塔里木盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1497-1505.
[9] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 王社教, 郭秋麟, 于京都, 郑曼, 陈宁生, 易庆. 我国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力、重点领域与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1383-1397.
[10] 王彬, 张强, 吕福亮, 杨涛涛, 杨志力, 孙国忠, 吴敬武, . 南海海域新生界沉积盆地天然气成藏条件及资源前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1542-1552.
[11] 杨浩珑,向祖平,袁迎中,李龙. 低渗气藏压裂气井稳态产能计算新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 151-157.
[12] 张吉,侯科锋,李浮萍,田敏,张志刚. 基于储层地质知识库约束的致密砂岩气藏储量评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏14区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1322-1329.
[13] 端祥刚,安为国,胡志明,高树生,叶礼友,常进. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝应力敏感实验[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1416-1424.
[14] 金凤鸣,贾善坡,张辉,林建品,尚翠娟,刘静,刘团辉,赵政嘉,席增强. 京津冀地区断陷盆地含水层储气库评价体系及目标优选[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1433-1445.
[15] 吴伟,谢军,石学文,赵圣贤,季春海,胡颖,郭艳波. 川东北巫溪地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成藏条件与勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 734-743.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!