天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

致密砂岩气非达西渗流规律与机制实验研究——以四川盆地须家河组为例

公言杰,柳少波,姜林,袁选俊,陶士振   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京  100083;2.提高石油采收率国家重点实验室,北京  100083
  • 收稿日期:2013-07-08 修回日期:2013-12-10 出版日期:2014-06-10 发布日期:2014-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 公言杰gongyanjie2008@petrochina.com.cn E-mail:gongyanjie2008@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:公言杰(1986-),男,山东蒙阴人,工程师,硕士,主要从事非常规油气聚集机理研究. E-mail:gongyanjie2008@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家油气重大专项“岩性地层油气藏成藏规律研究与关键技术攻关”项目(编号:2011ZX05001);中国石油天然气股份有限公司科学研究技术开发项目“油气勘探新领域、新理论、新方法、新技术研究”(编号:11.2011A-02.x.01)联合资助.

Experimental Study of Seepage Characteristic and Mechanismin Tight Gas Sands:A Case from Xujiahe Reservoir of Sichuan Basin

GONG Yan-jie,LIU Shao-bo,JIANG Lin,YUAN Xuan-jun,TAO Shi-zhen   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Beijing 100083,China;
    2.The State Key Laboratory of Oil Recovery,Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2013-07-08 Revised:2013-12-10 Online:2014-06-10 Published:2014-06-10

摘要:

尽管经典渗流力学提出了达西定律存在适用的速度下限,但是没有明确低速状态下非达西渗流规律。选取了四川盆地须家河组7组致密砂岩气样品进行渗流物理模拟实验,每个样品测定10~15个渗流数据点,最高注气压力为10MPa,并始终保持环压高于注入压力2~3MPa,以确保气体是沿致密砂岩孔隙流动而不会沿着岩心与加持器内壁发生串流。实验模拟了气体在致密砂岩中的完整运移过程,有效探索了致密气渗流机制,提出致密砂岩气渗流具备极低速非线性渗流、低速非线性渗流和低速线性渗流3个阶段,以及具备复合型、下凹型、上凸型和直线型4种渗流曲线模式的新认识。
 

关键词: 四川盆地, 致密砂岩气, 物理模拟实验, 渗流机制

Abstract:

Although the Darcy′s law with applicable speed limit was proposed in classical percolation mechanics,the non-Darcy percolation law is not clear under the low speed condition.7 groups of seepage simulation experiments of the Xujiahe tight gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin were carried out with highest gas injection pressure of 10MPa and confining pressure higher than the injection pressure of 2-3MPa in order to ensure that the gas migrated along the tight sandstone rather than along the inner wall of the core and blessings.10-15 flow data points were determined in each experiment.The experiments of the complete process of gas migration in tight sandstone effectively explore the tight gas seepage mechanism.Results of the experiments indicate that the seepage process of tight gas has 3 stages (very low-velocity & non-linear stage,low-velocity & non-linear seepage,low-velocity & linear stage),and 4 seepage curve models (composite type,concave type,convex type,linear type).

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Tight gas sands, Physical simulation experiment, Seepage mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1+2

[1]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M].Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2011:50-92.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011:50-92.]
[2]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Hou Lianhua,et al.Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M].2nd Edition.Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2013.[邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].第二版.北京:地质出版社,2013:103-106.]
[3]Kang Yili,Zhang Hao,Chen Yijian,et al.Comprehensive research of tight sandstones gas reservoirs stress sensitivity in Daniudi Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2006,17(3):335-338,344.[康毅力,张浩,陈一健,等.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田致密砂岩气层应力敏感性综合研究[J].天然气地球科学,2006,17(3):335-338,344.]
[4]Wang Shaofei,An Wenhong,Chen Peng,et al.Characteristic and development techniques of Sulige tight gas pool[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):138-145.[王少飞,安文宏,陈鹏,等.苏里格气田致密气藏特征与开发技术[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):138-145.]
[5]Hao Guoli,Liu Guangdi,Xie Zengye,et al.Gas-water distributed pattern in Xujiahe Formation tight gas sandstone reservoir and influential factor in central Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(3):427-434.[郝国丽,柳广弟,谢增业,等.川中地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏气水分布模式及影响因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(3):427-434.]
[6]Zhang Bo,Yuan Wenfang,Cao Shaofang,et al.Fuzzy-synthetical evaluation of main factors of formation fracture in Dabei Gasfield[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(2):250-253.[张博,袁文芳,曹少芳,等.库车坳陷大北地区砂岩储层裂缝主控因素的模糊评判[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(2):250-253.]
[7]Dong Xiaoxia,Mei Lianfu,Quan Yongwang.Types of tight sand gas accumulation and its exploration prospact[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(3):351-355.[董晓霞,梅廉夫,全永旺.致密砂岩气藏的类型和勘探前景[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(3):351-355.]
[8]Li Jianzhong,Guo Bincheng,Zheng Min,et al.Main types,geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(4):607-615.[李建忠,郭彬程,郑民,等.中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(4):607-615.]
[9]Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.[贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.]
[10]Yang Tao,Zhang Guosheng,Liang Kun,et al.The exploration of global tight sandstone gas and forecast of the development tendency in China[J].Engineering Science,2012,14(6):64-68,76.[杨涛,张国生,梁坤.全球致密气勘探开发进展及中国发展趋势预测[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):64-68,76.]
[11]National Energy Board.Geological Evaluating Methods for Tight Sandstone Gas[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2011.[国家能源局.致密砂岩气地质评价方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2011.]
[12]Klinkenberg L J.The permeability of porous media to liquid and gas[C]//API Drilling and Production Practice.Tulsa,OK:API 11th Mid-Year Meeting,1941:200-213.
[13]Wel K K,Morrow N R,Brewer K R.Effect of fluid,confining pressure,and temperature on absolute permeabilities of low permeability sandstones[J].SPE Formation Evaluation,1986,(4):413-423.
[14]Gidley J L.A method for correcting dimensionless fracture conductivity for non Darcy flow effect[J].SPE Production Engineering,1991,6(4):391-394.
[15]Zhu Weiyao,Song Hongqing,He Dongbo,et al.Low-velocity non-Darcy gas seepage model and productivity equations of low-permeability water-bearing gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2008,19(5):685-689.[朱维耀,宋洪庆,何东博,等.含水低渗气藏低速非达西渗流数学模型及产能方程研究[J].天然气地球科学,2008,19(5):685-689.]
[16]He Wenxiang,Yang Le,Ma Chaoya,et al.Effect of micro-pore structure parameter on seepage characteristics in ultra-low permeability reservoir:A case from Chang 6 reservoir of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2011,22(3):477-481,517.[何文祥,杨乐,马超亚,等.特低渗透储层微观孔隙结构参数对渗流行为的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地长6储层为例[J].天然气地球科学,2011,22(3):477-481,517.]
[17]Zheng Likun.Establishment of trinomial productivity equation for non-darcy effect low permeability gas reservoirs[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(1):146-149.[郑丽坤.低渗透气藏非达西渗流三项式产能方程的建立[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(1):146-149.]
[18]Li D,Enghr T W.Literature Review on Correlations of the Non Darcy Coefficient[R].SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference,15-17 May,Midland,Texas.SPE 70015,2001.
[19]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Yang Zhi,et al.New advance in unconventional petroleum exploration and research in China[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry,2012,31(4):312-322.[邹才能,陶士振,杨智,等.中国非常规油气勘探与研究新进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2012,31(4):312-322.]
[20]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Zhang Xiangxiang,et al.The controlling factors,formation mechanism and geological characteristics of large gas fields with low porosity and permeability in China[J].Science in China:Series D,2009,(12):1607-1624.[邹才能,陶士振,张响响,等.中国低孔渗大气区地质特征、控制因素和成藏机制[J].中国科学:D辑,2009,(12):1607-1624.]
[21]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Yuan Xuanjun,et al.Global importance of “continuous”petroleum reservoirs:Accumulation,distribution and evaluation[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(6):669-682.[邹才能,陶士振,袁选俊,等.“连续型”油气藏及其在全球的重要性:成藏、分布与评价[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(6):669-682.]
[22]Zou Caineng,Tao Shizhen,Zhu Rukai,et al.Formation and distribution of continuous gas reservoirs and their giant gas province:A case from the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation giant gas province,Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2009,36(3):307-319.[邹才能,陶士振,朱如凯,等.“连续型”气藏及其大气区形成机制与分布——以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组煤系大气区为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(3):307-319.]
[23]Yang Jian,Kang Yili,Li Qiangui,et al.Characters of micro-structure and percolation in tight sand gas reservoirs[J].Advance in Mechanics,38(2):229-236.[杨建,康毅力,李前贵,等.致密砂岩气藏微观结构及渗流特征[J].力学进展,2008,38(2):229-236.]
[24]Zhu Huayin,Zhou Juan,Wan Yujin,et al.Microscopic mechanism of gas and water flow in porous media[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2004,26(6):571-573.[朱华银,周娟,万玉金,等.多孔介质中气水渗流的微观机理研究[J].石油实验地质,2004,26(6):571-573.]
[25]Hu Yong,Zhu Huayin,Wan Yujin,et al.Daqing volcano rock pore structure and gas water seepage characteristics[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University,2007,29(5):63-65.[胡勇,朱华银,万玉金,等.大庆火山岩孔隙结构及气水渗流特征[J].西南石油大学学报,2007,29(5):63-65.]
[26]Green L J,Duwez P.Fluid flow through porous metals[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics,1951,39(8):39-45.
[27]Hassanizadeh S M,Gray W G.High velocity flow in porous media[J].Transport Porous Media,1987,(2):521-531.
[28]Bill.Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media[M].Beijing:Chinese Building Industry Press,1983:95-98.[贝尔.多孔介质流体动力学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1983:95-98.]
[29]Deng Yinger,Liu Ciqun,Huang Runqiu,et al.The Theory and Method of Seepage Mechanics[M].Beijing:Science Press,2004:21-26.[邓英尔,刘慈群,黄润秋,等.高声渗流理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2004:21-26.]
[30]Feng Wenguang.Foundation of Seepage Mechanics[M].Beijing:Science Press,2007:49-59.[冯文光.油气渗流力学基础[M].北京:科学出版社,2007:49-59.]
[31]Kong Xiangyan.Seepage Mechanics [M].2nd Edition.Hefei:University of Science & Technology China Press,2010:40-53.[孔祥言.高等渗流力学[M].第二版.合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2010:40-53.]
[32]Li Mingchuan,Yao Jun,Ge Jiali,et al.Research progress and development on seepage mechanics[J].Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics,2012,33(1):74-80.[李明川,姚军,葛家理.渗流力学进展与前沿[J].力学季刊,2012,33(1):74-80.]

[1] 朱立文,王震亮,张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[2] 邱 振,邹才能,李熙喆,王红岩,董大忠,卢斌,周尚文,施振生,冯子齐,张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[3] 龙胜祥,冯动军,李凤霞,杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[4] 葛岩,朱光辉,万欢,潘新志,黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[5] 赵力彬,张同辉,杨学君,郭小波,饶华文. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深区块深层致密砂岩气藏气水分布特征与成因机理[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 500-509.
[6] 翁定为,付海峰,包力庆,胥云, 梁天成,张金. 水平井平面射孔实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 572-578.
[7] 黄禹忠,刁素,栗铁峰,何红梅. 致密砂岩气藏压裂伤害及对策——以川西坳陷ZH构造JS12气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 579-585.
[8] 何文军,杨海波,费李莹,王学勇,杨彤远,杨翼波,鲍海娟. 准噶尔盆地新光地区佳木河组致密砂岩气有利区资源潜力综合分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 370-381.
[9] 高文杰,李贤庆,张光武,魏强,张吉振,祁帅,陈金明. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带深层致密砂岩气藏储层致密化与成藏关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 226-235.
[10] 朱华, 杨光, 苑保国, 应丹琳, 戴鑫, 周红飞, 徐世琦, 谈健康. 四川盆地常规天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1475-1485.
[11] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[12] 张吉,侯科锋,李浮萍,田敏,张志刚. 基于储层地质知识库约束的致密砂岩气藏储量评价——以鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田苏14区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1322-1329.
[13] 陈双,黄海平,张博原,谢增业. 原油及源内残余沥青裂解成气差异及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1375-1384.
[14] 贾成业,贾爱林,韩品龙,王建君,袁贺,乔辉. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组优质页岩储层特征与开发评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(9): 1406-1415.
[15] 张建勇,倪新峰,吴兴宁,李文正,郝毅,陈娅娜,吕学菊,谷明峰,田瀚,朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!