天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8储层定量化成岩作用及成岩相分析

楚美娟,郭正权,齐亚林,程党性   

  1. 1.中国石油长庆油田公司勘探开发研究院,陕西 西安 710018; 2.低渗透油气田勘探开发国家工程实验室,陕西 西安 710018
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-29 修回日期:2012-11-29 出版日期:2013-06-10 发布日期:2013-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 楚美娟chumj_cq@petrochina.com.cn E-mail:chumj_cq@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:楚美娟(1980-),女,山东菏泽人,工程师,硕士,主要从事石油地质方面的研究.E-mail:chumj_cq@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    基金项目〖HTSS〗:国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”项目(编号: 2011ZX05044;2011ZX05001)资助.

Quantitative Diagenesis and Diagenetic Facies Analysis on Chang 8 Reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin

CHU Mei-juan,GUO Zheng-quan,QI Ya-lin,CHENG Dang-xing   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Changqing Oilfield Company, Xi′an 710018, China;
    2.Exploration and Development National Project Laboratory of Low Permeability Oil and Gas Fields, Xi′an 710018, China
  • Received:2012-10-29 Revised:2012-11-29 Online:2013-06-10 Published:2013-06-10

摘要:

通过对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组大量的薄片观察和实验分析,认为长8油层组主要发育机械压实、碳酸盐胶结、绿泥石膜胶结和溶蚀4种成岩作用类型。通过开展视压实率、视胶结率和视溶蚀率的计算,结合研究区沉积背景,进行了分区对比,定量评价了各成岩作用对各沉积区孔隙度的影响。东北沉积区受强压实作用和强胶结作用的控制,原始孔隙损失最大;西部沉积区受弱压实和中等胶结作用的控制,原始孔隙损失最小;西南沉积区受中等压实和中等胶结作用的控制,原始孔隙度损失较小;西北沉积区受强压实作用和强溶蚀作用的控制,原始孔隙度损失较大。并划分了四大成岩相类型:绿泥石膜—粒间孔成岩相、长石溶蚀成岩相、碳酸盐胶结成岩相和弱压实成岩相。西部沉积体系主要为弱压实成岩相,压实程度较低,颗粒多呈点接触,物性最好;西南沉积体系主要为绿泥石膜—粒间孔成岩相发育区,物性很好;西北沉积体系主要为长石溶蚀成岩相发育区,绿泥石膜相对不发育,物性较好;东北沉积体系主要为碳酸盐胶结成岩相,溶蚀作用相对较弱,绿泥石膜不发育,物性较差。

关键词: 鄂尔多斯盆地, 延长组长8储层, 成岩作用, 定量化分析, 成岩相类型

Abstract:

Through a large number of thin section observations and experimental analyses about Chang 8 interval of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin,four main diagenesis types were proposed:mechanical compaction,carbonate cementation,chlorite film cementation and dissolution in Chang 8 interval.Based on the calculation of optic compaction rate,apparent cement ratio and optic dissolution rate,combined with the depositional background of study area,we performed division comparison,quantitatively evaluated the diagenetic effects on porosity of different sedimentary areas.The northeastern sedimentary area was controlled by strong compaction and strong cementation,which resulted in the maximum primary pore loss.The western sedimentary area was controlled by weak compaction and moderate cementation,which resulted in the minimum primary pore loss.The southwestern sedimentary area was affected by moderate compaction and moderate cementation,which resulted in relatively less primary pore loss.The northwestern sedimentary area was controlled by strong compaction and strong dissolution,which resulted in relatively greater primary pore loss.Four types of diagenetic facies have been proposed: chlorite membrane and intergranular pore diagenetic facies,feldspar dissolution diagenetic facies,carbonate cementation diagenetic facies,and weak compaction diagenetic facies.The western sedimentary system belongs to weak compaction diagenetic facies,where compaction degree is lower,particles are in point contact,and physical property is best.The southwestern sedimentary system mainly developed chlorite membrane and intergranular pore diagenetic facies with good physical property.The northwestern sedimentary system mainly developed feldspar dissolution diagenetic facies,where chlorite membrane is relatively not well developed and the physical property is relatively good.The northeastern sedimentary system mainly developed carbonate cement dissolution diagenetic facies,where chlorite membrane is relatively weak,intergranular pore is not developed,and physical property is poor.

Key words: Ordos Basin, Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation, Diagenesis, Quantitative analysis, Diagenetic facies

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3+2

[1]Cheng Qigui,Zhanglei,Zheng Haini,et al.Classification and significance of diagenesis-reservoir facies based on the quantitative characterization of diagenesis:By taking Chang-6 extra-low permeability reservoirs of Yanchang Formation of Triassic System in Wangyao-Xinghe-Houshi area of Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2010,32(5):60-66.[程启贵,张磊,郑海妮,等.基于成岩作用定量表征的成岩—储集相分类及意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地王窑杏河侯市地区延长组长6油层组特低渗储层为例[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(5):60-66.]

[2]Luo Minggao,Quantitative Reservoir Geology[M].Beijing: Geological Publishing House,1998:22-32.[罗明高.定量储层地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1998:22-32.]

[3]Yu Bo,Cui Zhilin,Liu Xuegang,et al.The Diagenesis of Chang-8 reservoir sandstone and its effect on porosity in Xifeng Oilfield[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2008,38(3):405-410.[于波,崔智林,刘学刚,等.西峰油田长8储层砂岩成岩作用及对孔隙影响[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2008,38(3):405-410.]

[4]Zhu Guohua,Relations between the accumulation of hydrocarbons and the diagenesis of Yanchang sandbodies in Shanxi Province[J].Petroleum Expoloration and Development,1985,6(7):1-7.[朱国华.陕北延长统砂体成岩作用与油气富集的关系[J].石油勘探与开发,1985,6(7):1-7.]

[5]Wang Jinpeng,Peng Shimi,Zhao Yanjie,et al.Reservoir diagenesis and porosity evolution of chang6-8 of Heshui area in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2008,30(2):70-174.[王金鹏,彭仕宓,赵艳杰,等.鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区长6-8段储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J].石油天然气学报:江汉石油学院学报,2008,30(2):170-174.]

[6]Wang Zhikun,Wang Duoyun,Zheng Ximin,et al.Depositional characteristics and physical behavior analysis of the Chang6-8 reservoir of Trassic Yanchang Formation in Longdong area,Shanganning[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2003,14(5):80-385.[王志坤,王多云,郑希民,等.陕甘宁盆地陇东地区三叠系延长统长6—长8 储层沉积特征及物性分析[J].天然气地球科学,2003,14(5):380-385.]

[7]Zhang Yiwei,Xiong Qihua,Wang Zhizhang,et al.Continental Reservoir Description[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1997:98-117.[张一伟,熊琦华,王志章,等.陆相油藏描述[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1997:98-117.]

[8]Liu Wei,Dou Qifeng,Huang Shuwang,et al.Quantitative characterization of diagenesis and diagenesis reservoir facies[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2002,31(5):399-405.[刘伟,窦齐丰,黄述旺,等.成岩作用的定量表征与成岩—储集相研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2002,31(5):399-405.]

[9][JP3]Luo Ping,Jia Ailin.China Petroleum Corporation Oil and Gas Reservoir Key Laboratory of Set[C].Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,2001:1-31.[JP4][罗平,贾爱林.中国石油天然气集团公司油气储集层重点实验室论文集[C].北京:石油工业出版社,2001:1-31.]

[10]Zhang Rui,Wang Qi,Yao Jingli,et al.Diagenetic characteristics and pore evolution from high-quality reservoirs of Yanchang Formation in the middle of Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2010,21(6):890-896.[张瑞,王琪,姚泾利,等.鄂尔多斯盆地延长世湖盆中部长6 段储层成岩特征[J].天然气地球科学,2010,21(6):890-896.]

[11]Ma Chunlin,Wang Ruijie,Luo Bilin,et al.Characteristics of Chang-8 oil reservoir and distribution of oil reservoirs in Maling Oilfield,Ordos Basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(3):214-519.[马春林,王瑞杰,罗必林,等.鄂尔多斯盆地马岭油田长8油层组储层特征与油藏分布研究[J].天然气地球科学,2012,23(3):214-519.]

[12]Chu Meijuan,Guo Zhengquan,Bai Chang′er.Sedimentation and evolution features in Chang 8 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2012,34(2):13-18.[楚美娟,郭正权,白嫦娥.鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长8油层组沉积及其演化特征[J].石油天然气学报,2012,34(2):13-18.]

[1] 刘琴琴,陈桂华,陈晓智,祝彦贺,杨小峰. 鄂尔多斯盆地L地区上古生界上石盒子组物源特征及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1094-1101.
[2] 朱立文,王震亮,张洪辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地乌审召地区山2亚段致密气“甜点”控因分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(8): 1085-1093.
[3] 吕正祥,王先东,吴家洋,卿元华. 渤海海域中部古近系湖相碳酸盐岩储层成岩演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 921-931.
[4] 杨智峰,曾溅辉,韩菲. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组7段致密油充注影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 961-972.
[5] 王香增,张丽霞,姜呈馥,尹锦涛,高潮,孙建博,尹娜,薛莲花. 鄂尔多斯盆地差异抬升对长7页岩孔隙的影响——以东南部甘泉地区和南部渭北隆起地区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 597-605.
[6] 倪新锋,沈安江,韦东晓,乔宇婷,王莹. 碳酸盐岩沉积学研究热点与进展:AAPG百年纪念暨2017年会及展览综述[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 729-742.
[7] 杨超,贺永红,马芳侠,雷裕红,陈义国. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组有机流体活动期次划分[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 655-664.
[8] 钟 佳,尤丽,张迎朝,曲希玉,代龙,吴仕玖. 琼东南盆地乐东—陵水凹陷黄流组峡谷水道储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 708-718.
[9] 葛岩,朱光辉,万欢,潘新志,黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[10] 屈雪峰,周晓峰,刘丽丽,丁黎. 鄂尔多斯盆地古峰庄—麻黄山地区长82低渗透砂岩致密化过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 337-348.
[11] 魏新善,魏柳斌,任军峰,蔡郑红,周黎霞. 鄂尔多斯盆地下古生界风化壳气藏差异性[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 178-188.
[12] 陈跃,马东民,吴圣,李新虎,方世跃,郭晨. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘煤系伴生泥页岩孔隙特征及主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 189-198.
[13] 姚泾利, 胡新友, 范立勇, 刘新社, 季海锟, . 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1465-1474.
[14] 王媛,林畅松,李浩,孙彦达,何海全,王清龙,姬牧野,张曼莉. 高频层序地层格架中碳酸盐岩成岩作用研究——以哈萨克斯坦Marsel探区下石炭统谢尔普霍夫阶为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 28-41.
[15] 张建勇,倪新峰,吴兴宁,李文正,郝毅,陈娅娜,吕学菊,谷明峰,田瀚,朱茂. 中国主要克拉通盆地深层白云岩优质储层发育主控因素及分布[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1165-1175.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!