天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥页岩埋藏过程孔隙度演化与预测模型探讨

郭秋麟，陈晓明，宋焕琪，郑曼，黄金亮，陈宁生，高日丽   

  1. 1.中国石油勘探开发研究院，北京 100083;2.中国石油大学 北京，北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-18 修回日期:2013-04-18 出版日期:2013-06-10 发布日期:2013-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 郭秋麟qlguo@petrochina.com.cn E-mail:qlguo@petrochina.com.cn
  • 作者简介:郭秋麟（1963-），男，福建龙海人，教授级高级工程师，博士，主要从事油气资源评价、盆地评价与数值模拟等研究. E-mail：qlguo@petrochina.com.cn.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大科技专项“岩性地层区带、圈闭评价与储层预测技术研究”课题（编号：2011ZX05001）；中国石油勘探开发研究院创新课题“泥页岩、致密砂岩孔隙演化与油气成藏数值模拟”（编号：2011Y005）；中国石油重大科技专项“中国石油第四次油气资源评价”(编号:2012E-0501201)联合资助.

Evolution and Models of Shale Porosity During Burial Process

GUO Qiu-lin，CHENG Xiao-ming，SONG Huan-qi，ZHENG Man，HUANG Jin-liang，CHENG Ning-sheng，GAO Ri-li   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China; 2.China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
  • Received:2013-02-18 Revised:2013-04-18 Online:2013-06-10 Published:2013-06-10

PDF (PC)

1206

摘要：

统计分析了国内外大量实测及测井解释孔隙度数据，揭示泥页岩孔隙度演化规律，指出孔隙度变化过程的差异，划分出正常压实和欠压实孔隙演化区。从3个方面探讨了引起孔隙度差异的原因：①处于生油高峰期的优质烃源岩，生烃过程中产生的超压减缓了孔隙度变小的速率，是泥页岩在中深层还保持相对较大孔隙度的主要因素，超压贡献的孔隙度超过5%；②处于生气中晚期的优质烃源岩，生烃过程形成的有机质纳米孔隙是深层富含有机质泥页岩孔隙度增加的另一个重要因素，有机质纳米孔贡献泥页岩孔隙度达到1.8%；③有机酸对脆性矿物的溶蚀作用对泥页岩孔隙增大贡献比预想的小。根据以上认识，建立了3段式的正常压实模型、欠压实模型以及有机质纳米孔校正模型，分析了模型关键参数，提出了有机质面孔率的估算模板。应用实例证明这些模型具有实用价值，可促进页岩气、页岩油等非常规油气资源评价及勘探开发技术的发展。

关键词: 页岩孔隙, 压实, 超压, 有机质纳米孔, 页岩气, 页岩油, 埋藏史

Abstract:

Through the analyses of shale porosity data from core test and logging interpretation,this paper demonstrates the shale porosity evolution trend and points out the difference of porosity evolution between normal compaction and under-compaction.Three reasons which caused difference in porosity evolution are discussed:(1)For the high quality shale during oil generation peak,the over-pressure which was generated during hydrocarbon generation slows down porosity decline rate,which is the main factor explaining why shale remains relatively high porosity at middle-deep depth.Over 5% of porosity increment was contributed by over-pressure.(2)For the high quality shale during middle-late gas generation period,nano-pores originated in hydrocarbon generation processes is another important factor causing the increment of porosity in organic-rich shale,which contributes 1.8% in average to the porosity evolution in shale.(3)The organic acid dissolution affects less to shale porosity increment.Based on the conclusions above,we have built three-stage normal compaction model,under-compaction model and nano-pore originating in organic matter correction model,analyzed the key parameters of the model and proposed a template for estimation of the face pore ratio in organic matter.

Key words: Shale porosity, Compaction, Overpressure, Nano-pore originating in organic matter, Shale gas, Shale oil, Burial history

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2+3

［1］Miao Jianyu,Zhu Zongqi,Liu Wenrong,et al.Characteristics of pore structures of Paleogene-Neogene argillaceous rocks in the Jiyang Depression［J］.Geological Review,2003,49(3):330-336.［苗建宇,祝总祺,刘文荣,等.济阳坳陷古近系—新近系泥岩孔隙结构特征［J］.地质论评,2003,49(3):330-336.］
［2］Athy L F.Density,porosity and compaction of sedimentary rock［J］.AAPG Bulletin,1930,14(1):1-24.
［3］Watts A B,Ryan W B F.Flexure of the lithosphere and continental margin basins［J］.Tectonophysics,1976,36:25-44.
［4］Van hinte J E.Geohistory analysis-applications of micropaleontology in exploration geology［J］.AAPG Bulletin,1978,72:758-764.
［5］Gallagher K.An examination of some uncertainties associated with estimates of sedimentation rates and tectonic subsidence［J］.Basin Research,1989,2:97-114.
［6］Rubey W W,Hubbert M K.Role of fluid pressure in mechanics of overthrust faulting［J］.AAPG Bulletin,1959,70:167-206.
［7］Shi Guangren,Li Huifen,Wang Suming,et al.1-D basin modelling system BAS1［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development,1989,16(6):1-10.［石广仁,李惠芬,王素明,等.一维盆地模拟系统BAS1［J］.石油勘探与开发,1989,16(6):1-10.］
［8］Guo Qiulin,Mi Shiyun,Shi Guangren,et al.Principle Method of Basin Modeling［M］.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998:11-16.［郭秋麟,米石云,石广仁,等.盆地模拟原理方法［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,1998:11-16.］
［9］Pang Xiongqi.Quantitative Modeling of Geological Process［M］.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2003:101-111.［庞雄奇.地质过程定量模拟［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,2003:101-111.］
［10］Selley R C.Porosity gradients in North Sea oil bearing sandstones［J］.Journal of the Geological Society of London,1978,135:119-132.
［11］Baldwin B,Butler C O.Compaction curves［J］.AAPG Bulletin,1985,69:622-626.
［12］Yao Xiuyun,Zhang Fenglian,Zhang Hongru.Comprehensive determination of physical properties of rock formations-the quantitative analysis of the relation between porosinty and depth(or permeability)for sandstone(or mudstone)［J］.Oil Geophysics Prospecting,1989,24(5):533-541.［姚秀云,张凤莲,赵鸿儒.岩石物性综合测定—砂、泥岩孔隙度与深度及渗透率关系的定量研究［J］.石油地球物理勘探,1989,24(5):533-541.］
［13］Giles M R,Indrelid S L,James D M D.Compaction the great unknown in basin modelling［C］// Duppenbecker S J,Iliffe J E.(eds)Basin Modelling:Practice and Progress.Geological Society,London:Special Publications,1998,141:15-43.
［14］Allen P A,Allen J R.Basin Analysis:Principles and Applications［M］.Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,1990:1-451.
［15］Liu Zhen,Shao Xinjun,Jin Bo,et al.Co-effect of depth and burial time on the evolution of porosity for classic rocks during the stage of compaction［J］.Geoscience,2007,21(1):125-132.［刘震,邵新军,金博,等.压实过程中埋深和时间对碎屑岩孔隙度演化的共同影响［J］.现代地质,2007,21(1):125-132.］
［16］Bei Feng,Wang Yuncheng.Compaction of Sediments and Primary Migration of Hydrocarbons［M］.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1985:257-264.［贝丰,王允诚.沉积物的压实作用与烃类的初次运移［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,1985:257 -264.］
［17］Chen Fajing,Tian Shicheng,Compaction and Hydrocarbon Migration［M］.Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,1989:113-134.［陈发景,田世澄.压实与油气运移［M］.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989:113-134.］
［18］Ye Qing,Chen Hongyu,Cheng Qiuquan,A new diagenesis modeling experimental apparatus［J］.Petroleum Instruments,2004,18(4):28-30.［叶庆,陈红宇,承秋泉.一种新型的成岩模拟实验装置［J］.石油仪器,2004,18(4):28-30.］
［19］Yang Shaochun,Wang Huijuan,Luo Haining,et al.Nanoscale pore structure characteristics of clastic rock in Shenglin Oilfield［J］.Journal of China University of Petroleum,2012,36(1):1-12.［杨少春,王惠娟,罗海宁,等.胜利油区碎屑岩纳米尺度孔隙结构特征［J］.中国石油大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(1):1-12.］
［20］Zou Caineng,Zhu Rukai,Bai Bing,et al.First discovery of nano-pore throat in oil and gas reservoir in China and its scientific value［J］.Acta Petrologica Sinica,2011,27(6):1857-1864.［邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.中国油气储层中纳米孔首次发现及其科学价值［J］.岩石学报,2011,27(6):1857-1864.］
［21］Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
［22］Sondergeld C H.Micro-structural studies of gas Shales［J］.SPE 131771,2010:1-17.
［23］Loucks R G,Reed R M,Ruppel S C,et al.Morphology,genesis,and distribution of Nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the mississippian Barnett shale［J］.Journal of Sedimentary Research,2009,79:848-861.
［24］Wang F P,Reed R M.Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales［C］.SPE 124253,2009:1-8.
［25］Milner M,McLin R,Petriello J,et al.Imaging Texture and Porosity in Mudstones and Shales:Comparison of Secondary and Ion-Milled Backscatter SEM Methods［C］.CSUG/SPE 138975,2010:1-10.
［26］Curtis M E,Ambrose R J,Devon Energy,et al.Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro-and Nano-Scales［C］.Canadian Unconventional Resources & International Petroleum Conference held in Calgary.Canada:Alberta,2010:19-21.
［27］Zhang Dunxiang.Compaction Experiment of Mudstone in Dongying Depression:First Research on Oil and Gas Primary Migration［R］.Shengli:The Oil & Gas Exploration and Development Research Report Set of Shengli Oil Field,1979.［张敦祥.东营凹陷泥岩压实实验——油气初次运移的初次探讨［C］.胜利:胜利油田勘探开发研究报告集(5)，1979.］
［28］Zhang Boquan,Guan Zhen,Zhang Guangya.Compaction Application in Oil and Gas Exploration［M］.Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,1992:1-6.［张博全,关振,张光亚.压实在油气勘探中的应用［M］.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992:1-6.］
［29］Dickinson G.Geological aspects of abnormal reservoir pressures in Gulf Coast Louisiana［J］.AAPG Rullitin,1953,37:410-432.
［30］Sclater J G,Christie P A F.Continental stretching:an explanation of the post mid-Cretaceous subsidence of the central North Sea Basin［J］.Journal of Geophysical Reserch,1980,85(B7):3711-3739.
［31］Hegarty K A,Weissel J K,Mutter J C.Subsidence history of Australia′s southern margin:constraints on basin models［J］.AAPG Bulletin,1988,72:615-633.
［32］Roy H G.Sediment Compaction The Achilles′ heel of basin modeling［J］.GEO ExPro Issue 4,2007,4:74-76.
［33］Underdown R,Redfern J.Petroleum generation and migration in the Ghadames Basin,north Africa:A two-dimensional basin-modeling study［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(1):53-76.
［34］Vejbk O V.Disequilibrium compaction as the cause for Cretaceous-Paleogene overpressures in the Danish North Sea［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2008,92(2):165-180.
［35］Zhang Jinyan.Well logging evalution method of shale oil reservoirs and its applications[J].Progress in Geophys,2012,27(3):1154-1162.[张晋言.页岩油测井评价方法及其应用[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(3):1154-1162.]
［36］Luo X R,Wang Z M,Zhang L Q,et al.Overpressure generation and evolution in a compressional tectonic setting,the southern margin of Junggar Basin,northwestern China［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(8):1123-1139.
［37］Hao F,Zou H Y,Gong Z S,et al.Hierarchies of overpressure retardation of organic matter maturation:Case studies from petroleum basins in China［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(10):1467-1498.
［38］Webster M,O′Connor S,Pindar B et al.Overpressures in the Taranaki Basin:Distribution,causes,and implications for exploration［J］.AAPG Bulletin,2011,95(3):339-370.
［39］Li Mingcheng.Oil and Gas Migration［M］.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2004:50-57.［李明诚.石油与天然气运移［M］.北京:石油工业出版社,2004:50-57.］
［40］Guo Qiulin,Li Jianzhong,Chen Ningsheng，et al.Modeling of the tight sandstone gas accumulation for the Xujiahe Formation,Hechuan-Tongnan area,Sichuan Basin［J］.Petroleum Exploration and Development,2011,38(4):409-417.［郭秋麟,李建忠,陈宁生,等.四川合川—潼南地区须家河组致密砂岩气成藏模拟［J］.石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):409-417.］
［41］Guo Qiulin,Chen Ningsheng，Hu Junwen,et al.Geo-model of tight sandstone gas accumulation and quantitative simulation［J］.Natural Gas Geoscience,2012,23(2):199-207.［郭秋麟,陈宁生,胡俊文,等.致密砂岩气聚集模型与定量模拟探讨［J］.天然气地球科学,2012,23(2):199-207.］
［42］Chen Kai,Liu Zhen,Zhu Wenqi,et al.Restoration of paleo-formation pressure of shale in the 3rd Member of Shahejie Formation and its application in eastern slope of Jinxian1-1 low uplift,Liadong Bay fault depression［J］.Geoscience,2012,26(3):540-546.［陈凯，刘震，朱文奇,等.辽东湾断陷金县1－1低凸起东斜波沙三段泥岩古地层压力恢复及应用［J］.现代地质,2012,26(3):540-546.］
［43］Liu Zhen,Chen Kai,Zhu Wenqi,et al.Paleo-pressure restoration of Chang 7 shale in Xifeng area,Ordos Basin［J］.Journal of China University of Petroleum,2012,36(2):1-7.［刘震，陈凯，朱文奇,等.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰地区长7 段泥岩古压力恢复［J］.中国石油大学学报:自然科学版，2012,36(2):1-7.］
［44］Zhang Yang,Ye Jiaren,Wang Zihao,et al.Characteristics and evolutionary history of overpressure in Panyu 4 Sag,Pearl River Moutain Basin［J］.Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology,2010,30(4):171-177.［张洋，叶加仁，王子嵩，等.珠江口盆地番禺４洼超压发育特征及演化历史［J］.海洋地质与第四纪地质,2010,30(4):171-177.］
［45］Zhang Jingong,Wang Dingyi,Di Shixiang,Distribution of open fractures in abnormal overpressure mudstone and primary migration of hydrocarbon［J］.Oil and Gas Geology,1996,17(1):27-31 ［张金功，王定一，邸世祥.异常超压带内开启泥岩裂隙的分布与油气初次运移［J］.石油与天然气地质,1996,17(1):27-31.］
[1] 周立宏，蒲秀刚，肖敦清，李洪香，官全胜，林伶，曲宁. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷孔二段页岩油形成条件及富集主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1323-1332.
[2] 赵文韬，荆铁亚，吴斌，周游，熊鑫. 断裂对页岩气保存条件的影响机制——以渝东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1333-1344.
[3] 夏鹏，王甘露，曾凡桂，牟雨亮，张昊天，刘杰刚. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组高—过成熟页岩气富氮特征及机理探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1345-1355.
[4] 康毅力，豆联栋，游利军，陈强，程秋洋. 富有机质页岩增产改造氧化液浸泡离子溶出行为[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 990-996.
[5] 曾凡辉,王小魏,郭建春,郑继刚,李亚州,向建华. 基于连续拟稳定法的页岩气体积压裂水平井产量计算[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(7): 1051-1059.
[6] 朱维耀，马东旭. 页岩储层有效应力特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 845-852.
[7] 余川，曾春林，周洵，聂海宽，余忠樯. 大巴山冲断带下寒武统页岩气构造保存单元划分及分区评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(6): 853-865.
[8] 邱 振，邹才能，李熙喆，王红岩，董大忠，卢斌，周尚文，施振生，冯子齐，张梦琪. 论笔石对页岩气源储的贡献——以华南地区五峰组—龙马溪组笔石页岩为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 606-615.
[9] 汪道兵，葛洪魁，宇波，文东升，周珺，韩东旭，刘露. 页岩弹性模量非均质性对地应力及其损伤的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(5): 632-643.
[10] 龙胜祥，冯动军，李凤霞，杜伟. 四川盆地南部深层海相页岩气勘探开发前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 443-451.
[11] 贺领兄，宋维刚，安生婷，徐永锋，沈娟，路超，王军. 青海东昆仑地区八宝山盆地烃源岩有机地球化学特征与页岩气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 538-549.
[12] 邢 舟,曹高社，毕景豪，周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[13] 张丹锋，胡文瑞，李莉，侯秀林，吕洲，周杨，张洋，王丽宁. 震动压实作用特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 328-336.
[14] 曹涛涛，邓模，宋之光，刘光祥，黄俨然，Andrew Stefan Hursthouse. 黄铁矿对页岩油气富集成藏影响研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 404-414.
[15] 卢文涛，李继庆，郑爱维，梁榜，张谦，杨文新. 涪陵页岩气田定产生产分段压裂水平井井底流压预测方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 437-442.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!