天然气地球科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 747–752.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2011.04.747

• 天然气与环境 • 上一篇    

CO2地质埋存目标区优选体系与评价方法研究

 李武广, 杨胜来, 娄毅   

  1. 中国石油大学(北京)石油工程教育部重点实验室,北京 102249
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-17 修回日期:2011-03-12 出版日期:2011-08-10 发布日期:2011-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 李武广liwuguangcup@163.com E-mail:liwuguangcup@163.com
  • 作者简介:李武广(1987-),男,甘肃庆阳人,博士研究生,主要从事油气田开发工作.
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”)项目“温室气体提高石油采收率的资源化利用和地下埋存”(编号:2006CB705800)资助.

Optimization System and Evaluation of CO2 Geological Storage Target Area

 LI  Wu-Guang, YANG  Sheng-Lai, LOU  Yi   

  1. MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering,China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China
  • Received:2011-01-17 Revised:2011-03-12 Online:2011-08-10 Published:2011-08-10

摘要:

在中国对CO2地质埋存的研究已有10多年的历程,但至今尚未建立完善的CO2地质埋存目标区优选体系,这也制约了我国CO2地质埋存应用的发展步伐。在收集国内外大量的CO2埋存基础资料和借鉴前人研究成果的基础上,详细分析了盆地特征条件、盆地资源条件和储层特征条件等因素对CO2地质埋存的影响,建立了相应的CO2地质埋存评价指标体系。通过层次分析法确定权重,利用无量纲化指标处理方法对指标进行标准化处理,采用加权平均模型对目标区进行模糊综合评价。最后以中国部分CO2地质埋存试验区为例进行了综合评价、排序,实际应用效果良好,同时研究结果还能够有效地指导利用CO2地质埋存技术提高油气藏开采效率。

关键词: CO2, 地质埋存, 目标区, 影响因素, 权重, 综合评价

Abstract:

The study for geological storage of CO2 has been more than ten years in China,but the optimization system of CO2 geological storage target area is not established yet.This embarrass situation has been restricting the development of the applications of geological storage of CO2.Based on the references of CO2 geological storage and the previous research results,we analyze the effect of the geological background,basinal resource and reservoir characteristics upon the CO2geological storage,and establish the evaluation system for the CO2 geological storage.By AHP to determine weights,we make the indicator standardization using dimensionless index approach,and evaluate the target areas using the weighted average model.Finally,we evaluate and sort some CO2 geological storage areas in China.The application results show optimization system can effectively guide the use of CO2geological storage to improve the efficiency of reservoir exploitation.

Key words: CO2, Geological storage, Target area, Effect factor, Weight, Comprehensive evaluation.

中图分类号: 

  • TE357

[1]Jiang Huaiyou,Shen Pingping,Li Xiangfang,et al.Carbon dioxide buried storage evaluation technology research in the oil and gas reservoir of EU[J].Foreign Oilfield Engineering,2007,23(12):42-44.[江怀友,沈平平,李相方,等.欧盟油气储层二氧化碳埋存评价技术研究[J].国外油田工程,2007,23(12):42-44.]
[2]Liu Baoming,He Jiaxiong,Xia Bin,et al.Recent studying situation and progress tendency of carbon dioxide[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,15(4):412-415.[刘宝明,何家雄,夏斌,等.国内外CO2研究现状及发展趋势[J].天然气地球科学,2005,15(4):412-415.]
[3]Shen Pingping,Jiang Huaiyou,Chen Yongwu,et al.EOR study of  CO2 injection[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoir,2007,14(3):1-4.[沈平平,江怀友,陈勇武,等.CO2注入技术提高采收率研究[J].特种油气藏,2007,14(3):1-4.]
[4]Shen Pingping,Liao Xinwei.Study in CO2 Geological and EOR[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.[沈平平,廖新维.二氧化碳地质埋存与提高石油采收率技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.]
[5]Orr F M Jr,Yu A D,Lein C L.Phase behavior ofCO2 and crude oil in low temperature reservoirs[J].Soc.Pet.Eng.J,1981,(8):480-492.
[6]Wang Feng,Tang Dazhen,Liu Honglin,et al.Analysis on the potential of the carbon dioxide-enhanced coalbed methane (CO2-ECBM) recovery in the Qinshui basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(4):117-120.[王烽,汤达祯,刘洪林.利用CO2-ECBM技术在沁水盆地开采煤层气和埋藏CO2的潜力[J].天然气工业,2009,29(4):117-120.]
[7]Gardner J W,Orr F M Jr,Patel P D.The Effect of Phase Behavior on CO2 Flood Displacement Efficiency[M].J.Pet.Tech.,1981,(11):2067-2081.
[8][KG*5/6]Yang Xiaosong,Sun Lei,Sun Liangtian,et al.The research of fuzzy integrated evaluation method in wells and layers choice for CO2 puff and huff[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(5):658-661.[杨小松,孙雷,孙良田,等.CO2 吞吐选井选层的综合评判方法研究[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(5):658-661.]
[9]Li Wuguang,Shao Xianjie,Kang Yuanyuan,et al.Application of AHP to MBO of oilfield development[J].Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2010,25(3):103-105.[李武广,邵先杰,康园园,等.层次分析法在油田开发目标管理中的应用[J].天然气勘探与开发,2010,25(3):103-105.]
[10]Li Zhenquan.Phase behaviors of light oil with dissolution of CO2under reservoir condition[J].Journal of University of Petroleum,2004,28(3):43-45.[李振泉.油藏条件下溶解CO2的稀油相特征实验研究[J].石油大学学报,2004,28(3):43-45.]
[11]Li Shilun,Zhou Shouxin,Du Jianfen,et al.Review and prospects for the development of EOR by gas injection at home and abroad[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2002,9(2):1-5.[李士伦,周守信,杜建芬,等.国内外注气提高石油采收率技术回顾与展望[J].油气地质与采收率,2002,9(2):1-5.]
[12]Stoica F I.Miscible-flooding in Oilfield Development[M].Translated by Wang Fusong.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1989.[Stoica F I.混相驱开发油田[M].王福松译.北京:石油工业出版社,1989.]

 

[1] 任茜莹,代金友,穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376-1382.
[2] 段毅,吴应忠,赵阳,曹喜喜,马兰花. 草本沼泽泥炭加水热解产物烃类气体氢同位素特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 305-310.
[3] 左罗,蒋廷学,罗莉涛,吴魏,赵昆. 基于渗流新模型分析页岩气流动影响因素及规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(2): 296-304.
[4] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 王社教, 郭秋麟, 于京都, 郑曼, 陈宁生, 易庆. 我国常规与非常规天然气资源潜力、重点领域与勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1383-1397.
[5] 郝永卯,韦馨林,董承顺. 不同驱油方式CO2微观分布特征及埋存量研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(6): 846-851.
[6] 朱学申,梁建设,柳迎红,王存武,廖夏,郭广山,吕玉民. 煤层气井产水影响因素及类型研究——以沁冰盆地柿庄南区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 755-760.
[7] 何胜林,张海荣,杨冬,吴一雄,吴进波. 高温高压条件下不同气体组分储层岩电实验及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 575-581.
[8] 申建,张春杰,秦勇,张兵. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区煤系砂岩气与煤层气共采影响因素和参数门限[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 479-487.
[9] 姜凤光,王小林,陈志海. 二氧化碳侵入前油气藏流体性质定量分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 488-493.
[10] 杨志冬. 准噶尔盆地红山嘴油田红153井区二叠系夏子街组砂砾岩储层特征及影响因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1829-1838.
[11] 马东旭,许勇,吕剑文,吉鸿杰,妥成荣,郝乐伟,苏龙,王琪. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区下石盒子组物源特征及其与储层关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1215-1224.
[12] 姜杉钰,康永尚,张守仁,叶建平,张兵,王金,吴见. 沁水盆地柿庄区块煤层气井排采动态影响因素分析及开发对策研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(6): 1134-1142.
[13] 赵军,杨阳. 含CO2气层孔隙度计算方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(4): 571-576.
[14] 马行陟,柳少波,姜林,田华,郝加庆. 页岩吸附气含量测定的影响因素定量分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 488-493.
[15] 管全中,董大忠,王淑芳,黄金亮,王玉满,张晨. 海相和陆相页岩储层微观结构差异性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(3): 524-531.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!