天然气地球科学

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于正演模拟的水下分流复合河道内单一河道划分

王俊,高银山,王洪君,王新星,鲍志东,张红静   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(北京)地球科学学院,北京 102249; 
    2.中国石油长庆油田分公司第五采油厂,陕西 西安 710200;
    3.东方地球物理公司物探技术研究中心,河北 涿州 072751
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-04 修回日期:2018-07-23 出版日期:2018-09-10 发布日期:2018-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 鲍志东(1964-),男,安徽巢湖人,教授,博士,主要从事沉积学研究. E-mail:baozd@cup.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王俊(1987-),男,湖北仙桃人,博士研究生,主要从事沉积学研究.E-mail:ric_jun@126.com.
  • 基金资助:
    “十二五”国家科技重大专项项目(编号:2011ZX05004-004-007);中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项项目(编号:2013E-0501)联合资助.
     

Identification of single channel sand body in the subaqueous distributarychannel compound sand bodies on the basis of forward simulation

Wang Jun ,Gao Yin-shan,Wang Hong-jun,Wang Xin-xing ,Bao Zhi-dong, Zhang Hong-jing   

  1. 1.College of Geoscience,China University of Petroleum(Beijing),Beijing 102249,China;
    2. 5thOil Production Plant,Changqing Oilfield Company of CNPC,Xi’an 710200,China;
    3.Geophysical Technology Research Center,BGP Inc.of CNPC,Zhuozhou 072751,China
  • Received:2018-04-04 Revised:2018-07-23 Online:2018-09-10 Published:2018-09-10

摘要: 水下分流河道是浅水三角洲沉积主要的砂体类型之一,但受砂体规模限制,如何在非密井网区对水下分流复合河道内部单一河道砂体进行表征,是目前开发地质研究中亟待解决的难点之一。以乾安油田高台子油层为例,采用井震结合的手段对目的层水下分流复合河道内单一河道砂体展开划分与识别。研究表明,水下分流复合河道内单一河道砂体侧向叠置关系可划分为切叠式、接触式和孤立式3大类,分别与单边侧向叠加、多边侧向叠加、厚度差异、厚—薄—厚、河间砂沉积型和河间泥沉积型6类测井—地质识别标志相对应;根据密井网区测井资料建立6类识别标志的实际地质模型,并进一步通过正演模拟建立6种单一河道组合正演模型,各种单一河道组合的连接部位的地震响应特征分别为“能量不变、波峰错动、波谷错位”、“能量不变、波形下错”、“能量减弱、波形拉长、上移”、“能量不变、单峰上移”、“能量减弱、视厚度增加、边界错动”、“能量很弱、出现复波”;由密井网区单一河道砂体划分结果拟合得到研究区单一水下分流河道砂体宽/厚比经验公式,在此指导下,通过寻找与已建立正演模型特征相符的井间地震响应,完成了稀疏井网区水下分流复合河道内单一河道砂体的识别。

关键词: 单一水下分流河道, 正演模拟, 井震结合, 青山口组, 乾安地区, 松辽盆地

Abstract: Subaqueous distributary channel is one of the major sand body types in shallow water delta facies,but limited by its size.How to characterize the single channel sand body in the compound channel sand bodies becomes a difficulty in the development geology research now.Taking the Gaotaizi oil layer in Qian’an Oilfield as an example,combined with well logs and seismic data,the single channel sand body in the subaqueous distributary compound sand bodies of the target layer is divided and recognized.The research shows that the lateral spatial overlay relationship between the single channel sand bodies in the compound channel sand bodies can be divided into three types,i.e.,mutual overlay style,contact style and isolation style.They are respectively corresponded to six log-geology recognition remarks,i.e.,one-sided lateral overlay type,both-sided lateral overlay type,thickness difference type,thick-thin-thick type,sand deposit between channels type and mud deposit between channels type.According to the log data in the high density well area,practical geology model of six recognition remarks is established,then single channel composite forward model corresponding to each geology model has been built through seismic forward simulation.Seismic response characteristics of the joint point in each forward model is “energy unchanged,peak shift,trough dislocation”,“energy unchanged,waveform down shift”,“energy reduced,waveform stretch,up shift”,“energy unchanged,single peak move up”,“energy reduced,visual thickness increased,boundary wave peak shift”,and “low energy,complex wave emerged”.The empirical formula of sand width/thickness ratio of the single subaqueous distributary channel sand body is fitted by the result of single channel sand division in the high density well area.With this guidance and looking for the similar seismic response characteristics between wells in the practical seismic profiles with the established forward models,the recognition of single channel sand body in the subaqueous distributary channel compound sand bodies in the low density well area is accomplished.

Key words: Single subaqueous distributary channel, Forward simulation, Identification marks of logging and seismic, Qingshankou Formation, Qian’an area, Songliao Basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3

[1]Lou Zhanghua,Lu Qingmei,Cai Xiyuan,et al.Influence of lake fluctuation on sandbody shapes at shallow-water delta front[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,1998,16(3):27-31.
楼章华,卢庆梅,蔡希源,等.湖平面升降对浅水三角洲前缘砂体形态的影响[J].沉积学报,1998,16(3):27-31.
[2]Ma Shizhong,Zhang Yongqing.Research on the channel pattern of present subaqueous distributary channel by remote sensing image[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(2):24-31.
马世忠,张永清.应用遥感信息图像研究现代水下分流河道河流类型[J].地学前缘,2012,19(2):24-31.
[3]Zhu Xiaomin,Deng Xiuqin,Liu Ziliang,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and model of shallow braided delta in large-scale lacustrine:An example from Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2013,20(2):19-28.
朱筱敏,邓秀芹,刘自亮,等.大型坳陷湖盆浅水辫状河三角洲沉积特征及模式:以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组为例[J].地学前缘,2013,20(2):19-28.
[4]Shan Xuanlong,Hu Jinxiang,Ren Lijun,et al.Characteristics of sedimentary facies for the third member of Qingshankou Formation in the Qian’an area of the Songliao Basin[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,2008,82(1):65-71.
单玄龙,胡金祥,任利军,等.松辽盆地乾安地区青山口组三段沉积微相特征[J].地质学报,2008,82(1):65-71.
[5]Liao Yi,Zheng Rongcai,Wang Chengyu,et al.Analysis of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy in Chang-8 subsection of Yanchang Formation,Jiyuan area of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2010,28(3):481-488.
廖一,郑荣才,王成玉,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区长8油层组高分辨率层序分析[J].沉积学报,2010,28(3):481-488.
[6]Zhou Yinbang,Wu Shenghe,Yue Dali,et al.Identification of single channel in compound distributary sand of SⅡ1+2b layer of west Ⅱ region,3rd block of Daqing Oilfield[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2010,17(2):4-8.
周银邦,吴胜和,岳大力,等.复合分流河道砂体内部单河道划分——以萨北油田北二西区萨Ⅱ1+2b为例[J].油气地质与采收率,2010,17(2):4-8.
[7]Feng Congjun,Bao Zhidong,Shan Qitong,et al.Single sand body identification in compound distributary channel of delta plain:A case study from the fourth member of Quantou Formation in the southern part of the central Fuyu Oilfield[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2012,33(1):77-83.
封从军,鲍志东,单启铜,等.三角洲平原复合分流河道内部单砂体划分—以扶余油田中区南部泉四段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2012,33(1):77-83.
[8]Zhao Xiaoqing,Bao Zhidong,Liu Zongfei,et al.An in-depth analysis of reservoir architecture of underwater distributary channel sand bodies in a river dominated delta:A case study of T51 block,Fuyu Oilfiled[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(2):181-188.
赵小庆,鲍志东,刘宗飞,等.河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体储集层构型精细分析——以扶余油田探51区块为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(2):181-188.
[9]Liang Hongwei,Mu Longxin,Fan Zifei,et al.The AHP study of architecture pattern of meandering reservoir on the basis of foward simulation[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2014,43(6):1063-1069,1086.
梁宏伟,穆龙新,范子菲,等.基于正演模拟的曲流河构型层次研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(6):1063-1069,1086.
[10]Zhao Junfeng,Qu Hongjun,Lin Jinyan,et al.Outcrop-based anatomy of a lacustrine delta succession:A case study from Peizhuang section,Ordos Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(6):1026-1034.
赵俊峰,屈红军,林晋炎,等.湖泊三角洲沉积露头精细解剖——以鄂尔多斯盆地裴庄剖面为例[J].沉积学报,2014,32(6):1026-1034.
[11]Fu Jing,Wu Shenghe,Wang Zhe,et al.Architecture model of shallow-water delta distributary channel in lake basin:A case study of the Yanchang Formation outcrops in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2015,46(11):4174-4182.
付晶,吴胜和,王哲,等.湖盆浅水三角洲分流河道储层构型模式——以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘延长组野外露头为例[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,46(11):4174-4182.
[12]Cai Dongmei,Hao Lanying,Guo Yajie,et al.Application of seismic sedimentology to predicting underwater distributary channel sandbody[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2016,47(6):850-856.
蔡冬梅,郝兰英,郭亚杰,等.地震沉积学在水下分流河道砂体预测中的应用[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2016,47(3):850-856.
[13]Lü Xiaoguang,Zhang Xuewen,Liu Henian,et al.Development of single-channel sandbody framework model by integrating seismic inversion and well data[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):82-86.
吕晓光,张学文,刘合年,等.综合应用地震反演及测井资料建立单砂体骨架模型[J].石油学报,2007,28(6):82-86.
[14]Zhang Xiuli,Jiang Yan,Hao Lanying,et al.Stochastic seismic inversion and channel sandbody prediction in dense well pattern areas[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2014,49(5):954-963.张秀丽,姜岩,郝兰英,等.密井网条件下随机地震反演及其在河道砂体预测中的应用[J].应用地球物理勘探,2014,49(5):954-963.
[15]Xu Liheng,Hao Lanying,Liu Jiangyu.Recognition of single channel in composite sand body based on well-seismic and inversion[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition,2014,36(2):64-70.
徐立恒,郝兰英,刘江玉.井震反演识别复合砂体内单一河道[J].西南石油大学学报:自然科学版,2014,36(2):64-70.
[16]Yan Baiquan,Han Wenbo,Sun Yu,et al.An application of stochastic inversion technique to describe channel sandbody subtly:Taking S-Ⅱlayer of the Saertu reservoir in north development area,Daqing Oilfield for an example[J].Geological Review,2015,61(6):1458-1467.
闫百泉,韩文伯,孙雨,等.应用随机反演技术精细刻画河道砂体——以大庆油田萨北开发区萨二组为例[J].地质论评,2015,61(6):1458-1467.
[17]Zhu Xiaomin,Zhao Dongna,Zeng Hongliu,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and seismic sedimentologic responses of shallow-water delta of Qingshankou Formation in Qijia area,Songliao Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2013,31(5):889-897.
朱筱敏,赵东娜,曾洪流,等.松辽盆地齐家地区青山口组浅水三角洲沉积特征及其地震沉积学响应[J].沉积学报,2013,31(5):889-897.
[18]Wei Wei,Zhang Shun,Zhang Chenchen,et al.Seismic sedimentology characteristics of lacustrine-delta facies of Quantou-Nenjiang Formations in north Songliao Basin[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(6):1153-1161.
魏巍,张顺,张晨晨,等.松辽盆地北部泉头组—嫩江组河流与湖泊—三角洲相地震沉积学特征[J].沉积学报,2014,32(6):1153-1161.
[19]Li Zhipeng,Lin Chengyan,Dong Bo,et al.An internal structure model of subaqueous distributary channel sands of the fluvial-dominated delta[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(1):101-105.李志鹏,林承焰,董波,等.河控三角洲水下分流河道砂体内部建筑结构模式[J].石油学报,2012,33(1):101-105.
[20]Leeder M R.Fluviatile fining upwards cycles and the magnitude of paleochannels[J].Geological Magazine,1973,110(3):265-276.
[21]Lorenz J C,Heinze D M,Clark J A,et al.Determination of width of meander-belt sandstone reservoirs from vertical downhole data,Mesaverde Group,Piceance Greek Basin,Cororado[J].AAPG Bulletin,1985,69(2):710-721.
[22]Li Yupeng,Wu Shenghe,Yue Dali.Quantitative relation of the channel width and point-bar length of modern meandering river[J].Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing,2008,27(6):19-22.
李宇鹏,吴胜和,岳大力.现代曲流河道宽度与点坝长度的定量关系[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(6):19-22.
[23]Li Yan,Jin Zhenkui,Gao Baishui,et al.Sedimentary characteristics and quantitative parameters of sand bodies in distributary channel[J].Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment,2016,38(2):206-216.
李燕,金振奎,高白水,等.分流河道内砂体沉积特征及定量参数-以鄱阳湖赣江三角洲为例[J].地球科学与环境学报,2016,38(2):206-216.

[1] 孙东, 石小茜, 王振卿, 陈利新, 王靖, 孙甲庆, 代冬冬, 房启飞. 塔里木盆地哈拉哈塘地区二叠系火成岩体对下伏地层地震成像影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(12): 1781-1787.
[2] 白雪峰, 梁江平, 张文婧, 付丽, 彭建亮, 薛涛, 杨立伟, 刘继莹. 松辽盆地北部深层天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1443-1454.
[3] 王颖, 邓守伟, 范晶, 邹晓品, 杨静. 松辽盆地南部重点断陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1455-1464.
[4] 周翔,舒萍,于士泉,陈曦. 松辽盆地徐深9区块营一段火山岩气藏储层特征及综合评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 62-72.
[5] 任丽华,代俊杰,林承焰,曹铮. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部青山口组超压特征及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1020-1030.
[6] 黄玉龙,刘春生,张晶晶,高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系火山岩气藏有效储层特征及成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 420-428.
[7] 陈彬滔,潘树新,方乐华,张庆石,李成刚,梁苏娟. 松辽盆地齐家—古龙凹陷青山口组泥页岩层段储层特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 298-308.
[8] 陈瑞银,王汇彤,陈建平,刘玉莹. 实验方法评价松辽盆地烃源岩的生排烃效率[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(5): 915-921.
[9] 李磊,王小刚,陈玲玲,谭卓,曹冰,申雯龙. 东海西湖凹陷始新统复合潮汐水道三维地震表征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(2): 352-359.
[10] 刘超,印长海,卢双舫. 变系数ΔLgR烃源岩测井评价技术关键参数厘定方法及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(10): 1925-1931.
[11] 王卓卓,施立志,张永生. 松辽盆地北部大庆长垣浅层气成藏特征分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(9): 1350-1357.
[12] 王民,孙业峰,王文广,王岩,石蕾. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷深层烃源岩生气特征及天然气资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(7): 1011-1018.
[13] 张庆石,张革,陈彬滔,王革,梁苏娟,刘彩燕. 松辽盆地坳陷期湖底扇沉积特征与分布规律——以英台地区青山口组为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(3): 318-325.
[14] 李丹,董春梅,林承焰,任丽华,谭丽娟,谢晶晶. 松辽盆地南部让字井斜坡带超压特征及其对源下油藏运聚模式的控制[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(3): 326-332.
[15] 施立志,王卓卓,张永生. 松辽盆地齐家地区高台子油层致密油分布及地质特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(12): 1943-1950.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵应成,周晓峰,王崇孝,王满福,郭娟娟 . 酒西盆地青西油田白垩系泥云岩裂缝油藏特征和裂缝形成的控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 12 -15 .
[2] 任以发. 微量烃分析在井中化探录井中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 88 -92 .
[3] 张延敏, . 1996~1999年世界天然气产量[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(3): 44 -45 .
[4] 王先彬;妥进才;周世新;李振西;张铭杰;闫宏;. 论天然气形成机制与相关地球科学问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 7 -13 .
[5] 李美俊;卢鸿;王铁冠;吴炜强;刘菊;高黎惠;. 北部湾盆地福山凹陷岩浆活动与CO2 成藏的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 55 -59 .
[6] 倪金龙;夏斌;. 济阳坳陷坡折带组合类型及石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 64 -68 .
[7] 施立志;林铁锋;王震亮;王卓卓;姚勇;. 库车坳陷下白垩统天然气运聚系统与油气运移研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 78 -83 .
[8] 程同锦,朱怀平,陈浙春. 孔雀1井剖面地球化学特征与烃类的垂向运移[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(2): 148 -152 .
[9] 唐友军,文志刚,窦立荣,徐佑德. 一种估算原油成熟度的新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(2): 160 -162 .
[10] Cramer B;Faber E;Gerling P;Krooss B M;刘全有(译). 天然气稳定碳同位素反应动力学研究――关于干燥、开放热解实验中的思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2002, 13(5-6): 8 -18 .