Longmaxi shale,Adsorption gas,Free gas,Isothermal adsorption/desorption,Pressure
 
,"/> 四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩吸附特征室内实验

天然气地球科学

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩吸附特征室内实验

杨文新,李继庆,苟群芳   

  1. 中国石化江汉油田分公司勘探开发研究院,湖北 武汉 430023
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-02 修回日期:2017-09-01 出版日期:2017-09-10 发布日期:2017-09-10
  • 作者简介:杨文新(1967-),男,湖北松滋人,高级工程师,主要从事非常规油气的渗流机理、开发试验及提高采收率研究. E-mail:ywx2369@sina.com.
  • 基金资助:
     
    国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”项目“涪陵页岩气开发示范工程”(编号:2016ZX05060);中国石化股份公司科研项目“涪陵页岩气开发效果评价及开发技术政策研究”(编号:P2015139);中国石化江汉油田分公司项目“涪陵页岩气田气藏工程研究”(编号:JKK0016001)联合资助.

Experiment study on shale adsorption properties for Jiaoshiba shale,Sichuan Basin

Yang Wen-xin,Li Ji-qing,Gou Qun-fang   

  1. Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Jianghan Oilfield Company,SINOPEC,Wuhan 430023,China
  • Received:2017-06-02 Revised:2017-09-01 Online:2017-09-10 Published:2017-09-10

摘要:

页岩含气量对页岩气田储量计算至关重要,直接关系到页岩气的产量、递减规律等。页岩气以游离气和吸附气形式赋存,有重量法等温吸附、容量法等温吸附、现场含气量测试等不同方法测试吸附气、游离气。通过测试页岩气降压解吸过程中气体体积变化来测量吸附气量,首次建立了同时测试页岩吸附气、游离气的方法。该方法采用柱状页岩岩心,模拟不同温度、压力、含水、真实孔隙结构等条件,消除了等温吸附曲线的负吸附异常;分析了有机质含量、压力、温度、含水、气体组成等因素对页岩吸附量的影响。实验结果表明,页岩的甲烷吸附量随压力增加而增加,压力大于12MPa后达到吸附/解吸动态平衡,吸附量不再增加;有机质含量TOC增加时吸附量增加;温度增加时吸附量降低;页岩含水后吸附量降低;甲烷吸附量高于氮气吸附量;焦石坝龙马溪组主力层页岩在温度20℃、压力30MPa下页岩气吸附气量介于1.8~3.1m/t之间,总含气量介于5.1~6.5m/t之间,吸附气占总气量40%左右。
 

关键词: 龙马溪组页岩, 吸附气, 游离气, 等温吸附/解吸, 压力

Abstract:

Gas content is a key parameter for shale reserves estimation,production prediction and gas rate decline analysis.The storage mechanisms in shale is contained free and adsorption,and there are many different gas content testing methods such as gravimetric isotherm method,volume isotherm method and traditional testing method in field.In this study,a new shale gas content lab testing method is proposed based on measuring the gas volume changes during shale gas desorption.In this new method,cylindrical shale cores are used for simulating the influences of temperature,pressure,moisture content,real pore structure on total gas content,negative adsorption anomalies are eliminated by using this method.The experimental results revealed that adsorption gas content increased with pressure and the volume of adsorption gas content is at equilibrium and does not increase while the pressure is up to 12MPa.There is a positive relationship between adsorption gas content and TOC,and a negative relationship between adsorption gas content and temperature and moisture content.Adsorption of methane is higher than the nitrogen adsorption in shale.At a temperature of 20℃,under pressure of 30MPa,the adsorption gas content of Longmaxi shale in Jiaoshiba is 1.8-3.1m3/t and total gas content is 5.1-6.5m3/t,and about 40% of the total volume is adsorbed gas.
 

Key words: Longmaxi shale')">

')">Pressure
 

中图分类号: 

  • TE311+.1

[1]Zhang Jinchuan,Xu Bo,Nie Haikuan,et al.Exploration potential of shalegasresources in China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2008,28(6):136-140.[张金川,徐波,聂海宽,等.中国页岩气资源勘探潜力[J].天然气工业,2008,28(6):136-140.]
[2]Qiu Xiaosong,Hu Mingyi,Hu Zhonggui,et al.Evaluation methods and parameter assignments of shale gas resources:A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the Middle Yangtze region[J].Geology in China,2014,41(6):2091-2098.[邱小松,胡明毅,胡忠贵,等.页岩气资源评价方法及评价参数赋值:以中扬子地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J].中国地质,2014,41(6):2091-2098.]
[3]Curtis J B.Fractured shale-gas systems[J].AAPG Bulletin,2002,6(11):1921-1938.[ZK)]
[4][ZK(3#]Chalmers G R L,Bustin R M.Lower Cretaceous gas shales innortheastern British Columbia,Part Ⅰ:Geological controls on methanesorption capacity[J].Bulletin of Canada Petroleum Geology,2008,56(1):1-21.
[5]Ross D J K,Bustin R M.Shale gas potential of the Lower JurassicGordondale Member,northeastern British Columbia,Canada[J].Bulletin of Canada Petroleum Geology,2007,55(1):51-75.
[6]Jia Chengzao,Zheng Min,Zhang Yongfeng,et al.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2101,39(2):129-136.[贾承造,郑民,张永峰,等.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.]
[7]Wan Jinbin,He Yufei,Liu Miao,et al.Shale gas conten measurement and Calculation method[J].Well Logging Technology.2015,39(6):756-761.[万金彬,何羽飞,刘淼,等.页岩含气量测定及计算方法研究[J].测井技术,2015,39(6):756-761.]
[8]China National Standardization Administration Commission.Experimental Method of High-pressure Isothermal Adsorption to Coal:GB/T19560-2008[S].Beijing:China Standard Press,2008:2-3.[中国国家标准化管理委员会.煤的高压等温吸附试验方法:GB/T19560-2008[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008:2-3.]
[9]Nie Haikuan,Zhang Jinchun,Ma Xiaobin,et al.A preliminary study of negative adsorption gas content by isothermal adsorption[J].Earth-Science Frontiers,2013,20(6):282-288.[聂海宽,张金川,马晓彬,等.页岩等温吸附气含量负吸附现象初探[J].地学前缘,2013,20(6):282-288.]
[10]Zhang Qingling.The analysis of abnormal phenomena in shale isothermal absorption volumetry test[J].Coal Geology & Expioration,2015,43(5):31-33.[张庆玲.页岩容量法等温吸附实验中异常现象分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(5):31-33.]
[11]Guo Wei,Xiong Wei,Gao Shusheng,et al.Isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2013,44(7):2836-2839.[郭为,熊伟,高树生,等.页岩气等温吸附/解吸特征[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2013,44(7):2836-2839.]
[12]Guo Wei,Xiong Wei,Gao Shusheng,et al.Impact of temperature on the isothermal adsorption/desorption characteri stics of shale gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(4):481-485.[郭为,熊伟,高树生,等.温度对页岩等温吸附/解吸特征影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(4):481-485.]
[13]Zhao Yuji,Guo Wei,Xiong Wei,et al.Study of impact factors on shale gas adsorption and desorption[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(6):940-945.[赵玉集,郭为,熊伟,等.页岩等温吸附/解吸影响因素研究[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(6):940-945.]
[14]Guo Xusheng,Li Yuping,Liu Ruobin,et al.Characteristics and controlling factors of micro-pore structures of Longmaxi shale play in the Jiaoshibaarea,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(6):9-16.[郭旭升,李宇平,刘若冰,等.四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J].天然气工业,2014,34(6):9-16.]
[15]Chen Lei,Jiang Zhenxue,Ji Wenming,et al.Characteristics of microscopic porestructures and their effect impacts on methane adsorption capacity in continental shales[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2016,22(2):335-343.[陈磊,姜振学,纪文明,等.陆相页岩微观孔隙结构特征及对甲烷吸附性能的影响[J].高校地质学报,2016,22(2):335-343.]
[16]Liu Honglin,Wang Hongyan.Adsorptivity and influential factors of marine shales in South China[J].Natural Gas Industry,2012,32(9):5-9.[刘洪林,王红岩.中国南方海相页岩吸附特征及其影响因素[J].天然气工业,2012,32(9):5-9.]
[17]Wang Yupu,Zuo Luo,Hu Zhiming,et al.Experiment of supercritical methane adsorption on shale and adsorption modeling[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technoligy,2015,46(11):4129-4135.[王玉普,左罗,胡志明,等.页岩高温高压吸附实验及吸附模型[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2015,46(11):4129-4135.]
[18]Kang Yili,Chen Yibin,Li Xiangchen,et al.Effect of particle size on methane sorption capacity of shales[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2017,28(2):272-279.[康毅力,陈益滨,李相臣,等.页岩粒径对甲烷吸附性能影响[J].天然气地球科学,2017,28(2):272-279.]
[19]Zhao Chunpeng,Lun Zengmin,Wang Weihong,et al.Isothermal adsorption experiment of full-diameter shale core in Longmaxi Formation under reservoir condition[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2016,23(6):749-752.[赵春鹏,伦增珉,王卫红,等.储层条件下龙马溪组全直径页岩吸附实验[J].断块油气田,2016,23(6):749-752.]
[20]Zhou Shangwen,Wang Hongyan,Xue Huaqing,et al.Difference between excess and absolute adsorption capacity of shale and a new shalegas reserve calculation method[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016,36(11):12-20.[周尚文,王红岩,薛华庆,等.页岩过剩吸附量与绝对吸附量的差异及页岩气储量计算新方法[J].天然气工业,2016,36(11):12-20.]

[1] 任茜莹,代金友,穆中奇. 气藏采收率影响因素研究与启示——以靖边气田A井区为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(9): 1376-1382.
[2] 翁定为,付海峰,包力庆,胥云, 梁天成,张金. 水平井平面射孔实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 572-578.
[3] 史文洋,姚约东,程时清,石志良,高敏. 裂缝性低渗透碳酸盐岩储层酸压改造油井动态压力特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 586-596.
[4] 洪峰,姜林,卓勤功,鲁雪松,马行陟,郝加庆. 中国前陆盆地异常高压气藏类型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(3): 317-327.
[5] 杨浩珑,向祖平,袁迎中,李龙. 低渗气藏压裂气井稳态产能计算新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 151-157.
[6] 王业众,段国彬,桑宇,彭华,张林,周长林,余良志,陈伟华. 衬管完井水平井新型布酸技术研究与应用——以安岳气田磨溪构造龙王庙组气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1264-1268.
[7] 任丽华,代俊杰,林承焰,曹铮. 松辽盆地扶新隆起带南部青山口组超压特征及油气地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(7): 1020-1030.
[8] 王妍妍,王卫红,胡小虎,刘华,郭艳东. 诱导渗透率场中压裂水平井压力动态分析模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 785-791.
[9] 杨旭,孟英峰,李皋,曾辉. 考虑水锁损害的致密砂岩气藏产能分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 812-818.
[10] 崔亚星,熊伟,胡志明,左罗,高树生. 等温条件下页岩储层视渗透率随压力变化规律研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 514-520.
[11] 刘培,于水明,王福国,陶文芳,张庆,许新明,胡坤. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷海相泥岩盖层有效性评价及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 452-459.
[12] 田冷,李鸿范,马继翔,谢全,顾岱鸿,任效星. 基于启动压力梯度与应力敏感的致密气藏多层多级渗流模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1898-1907.
[13] 乔霞,罗明高, 王洪峰,肖香姣,阳建平. #br# 一种利用生产动态历史评价异常高压气井产能的新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1908-1913.
[14] 陶士振,高晓辉,李昌伟,曾溅辉,张响响,杨春,张婧雅,公言杰. 煤系致密砂岩气渗流机理实验模拟研究——以四川盆地上三叠统须家河组煤系致密砂岩气为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(7): 1143-1152.
[15] 朱苏阳,杜志敏,李传亮,彭小龙. 基于复合解吸理论的煤层气物质平衡方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(6): 1128-1133.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!