天然气地球科学
高级检索
作者投稿 专家审稿 编辑办公

天然气地球科学 doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.05.008

• 非常规天然气 • 上一篇    下一篇

河北省北部页岩样品纳米级孔隙结构及其影响因素

陈术源，秦勇   

  1. 中国矿业大学煤层气资源与成藏过程教育部重点实验室，江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-10 修回日期:2017-05-09 出版日期:2017-06-10 发布日期:2017-06-10
  • 作者简介:陈术源（1991-），男，山东东平人，博士研究生，主要从事煤层气和页岩气储层研究. E-mail：chenshuyuan1991@163.com.
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目（编号：U1361207)；国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:41530314）联合资助.

Nanometer pore structure and geological controlsof shale samples in northern Hebei Province,China

Chen Shu-yuan，Qin Yong   

  1. Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process,Ministry of Education,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China
  • Received:2017-01-10 Revised:2017-05-09 Online:2017-06-10 Published:2017-06-10

PDF (PC)

966

摘要：

页岩孔隙结构影响到页岩气资源前景乃至后期开发工程，其中纳米级孔隙是主要研究对象。采集不同层系23件黑色页岩样品，对其物质组成和小于100nm孔隙的结构进行测试。结果显示：石炭系—二叠系山西组、太原组样品的总有机碳（TOC）平均含量低于上元古界洪水庄组和下马岭组样品，黏土矿物含量普遍高于洪水庄组和下马岭组并含有大量高岭石，平均孔比表面积和孔容由高到低依次为洪水庄组、下马岭组、山西组和太原组。黏土矿物含量、种类和TOC均显著影响到页岩的孔隙结构：在TOC<2%、2%~4.58%和>4.58% 3个分布段，页岩样品孔比表面积和孔容与黏土矿物含量之间分别呈正相关关系，与TOC含量呈负相关关系；当TOC含量>4.58%时，TOC含量变化对孔隙结构的影响更为明显；而当TOC含量<2%时，黏土矿物含量和种类对孔隙结构的影响更为明显，其中以伊利石含量的影响为主，高岭石含量的影响较小。发现TOC含量/黏土矿物含量之比与孔比表面积和孔容的相关性良好，指示与有机质丰度增高引起的孔比表面积和孔容变化相比，黏土矿物含量增高对孔隙结构的改善效应更为明显，两者的分布关系也是孔隙结构的重要指示影响因素和表征。研究认为，山西组和太原组页岩孔隙结构受黏土矿物特征影响较大，下马岭组和洪水庄组页岩孔隙结构则更多地受到TOC含量的影响。

关键词: 页岩气, 孔隙结构, TOC, 黏土矿物, 比例关系

Abstract:

Shale pore structure,especially nano-scale pore,can affect the prospect of shale gas resources and even later development engineering.Material composition and pore structures (size<100nm) were investigated via 23 black shale samples from different layers.The results showed that the average content of the total organic carbon (TOC) of samples from Carboniferous-Permian Shanxi and Taiyuan formations are lower than that from Upper Proterozoic Hongshuizhuang and Xiamaling formations.However,the clay mineral content of samples from Carboniferous-Permian is higher than those from Upper Proterozoic,especially kaolinite.Descending order of the average pore size and average pore volume are Hongshuizhuang Formation,Xiamaling Formation,Shanxi Formation and Taiyuan Formation.The clay mineral content,type and TOC can significantly affect the pore structure of shale.There are three segments of TOC content,<2%,2%-4.58% and >4.58%.The specific surface area and pore volume have a positive correlation with clay minerals content,but have a negative correlation with TOC,respectively.When TOC content is >4.58%,the change of TOC content has more obvious effects on the pore structure.When TOC content is <2%,the clay mineral contents and types have obvious effects on the pore structure,and effects of illite is larger than that of kaolinite.The ratio of TOC content to clay mineral content has a good correlation with specific surface area and pore volume,which indicates that compared to the changing degree of the specific surface area and pore volume caused by the organic matter abundance,the change caused by clay minerals content increasing is more obvious.Both distributions are also the important instructions and characterization of the pore structure.In a word,the characteristics of clay minerals have great influence on the pore structure of shale from Shanxi and Taiyuan formations,and TOC content has great influence on the pore structure of shale from Xiamaling and Hongshuizhuang formations.

Key words: Shale gas, Pore structure, TOC, Clay mineral, Proportion relationship

中图分类号: 

  • TE132.2

[1]Hou Yuguang,He Sheng,Yi Jizheng,et al.Effect of pore structure on methane sorption potential of shales[J].Petroleum Exploration & Development,2014,41(2):248-256.[侯宇光,何生,易积正,等.页岩孔隙结构对甲烷吸附能力的影响[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(2):248-256.]
[2]Ross D J K,Bustion R M.The importance of shale composition and pore structure upon gas storage potential of shale gas reservoirs[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology,2009,26:916-927.
[3]Bustin R M,Bustin A M M,Cui X,et al.Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics[C].SPE 119892,2008.
[4]Jarvie D.Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Generation and Storage in the Barnett Shale,Fort Worth Basin,Texas[R].Texas:Humble Geochemical Services Division,2004.
[5]Nuttall B C,Drahovzal J A,Eble C F,et al.U.S.DOE/NETLDE-FC26-02NT41442:Analysis of the Devonian Shale in Kentucky for Potential CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Natural Gas Production[R].Lexington:Kentucky Geological Survey,2005.
[6]Jarvie D M,Hill R J,Ruble T E,et al.Unconventional shale gas systems:The Mississippian Barnett shale of north-central Texas as on model for thermogenic shale gas assessment[J].AAPG Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
[7]Yang Feng,Ning Zhengfu,Hu Changpeng,et al.Characterization of microscopic pore structures in shale reservoirs[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(2):301-311.[杨峰,宁正福,胡昌蓬,等.页岩储层微观孔隙结构特征[J].石油学报,2013,34(2):301-311.]
[8]Song Xu,Wang Sibo,Cao Taotao,et al.The methane adsorption features of Cambrian shale in the Yangtze Platform[J].A cta Geologica Sinica,2013,87(7):1041-1048.[宋叙,王思波,曹涛涛,等.扬子地台寒武系泥页岩甲烷吸附特征[J].地质学报,2013,87(7):1041-1048.]
[9]Chalmers G R L,Bustin R M.Lower Cretaceous shales in northeastern British Columbia.Part I:Geological controls on methane sorption capacity[J].Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,2008,56(1):1-21.
[10]Sondergeld C H,Ambrose R J,Rai C S,et al.Micro-structural Studies of Gas Shales[C]//SPE,Unconventional Gas Conference,Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010.
[11]Wang Maozhen,Liu Shaobo,Ren Yongjun,et al.Porecharacteristics and methane adsorption of clay minerals in shale gas reservoir[J].Geological Review,2015,61(1):207-216.[王茂桢,柳少波,任拥军,等.页岩气储层黏土矿物孔隙特征及其甲烷吸附作用[J].地质论评,2015,61(1):207-216.]
[12]Arighieri R.Nanoporosity characteristics of some natural clay minerals and soil[J].Clays and Clay Minerals,2004,52(6):700-704.
[13]Wang C C,Juang L C,Lee C K,et al.Effects of exchanged surfactant cations on the pore structure and adsorption characteristics of montmorllonite[J].Journal of Colloid Interface Science,2004,280:27-35.
[14]Ji Liming,Qiu Junli,Xia Yangqing,et al.Micro-pore characteristics and methane adsorption properties ofcommon clay minerals by electron microscope scanning[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2012,33(2):249-256.[吉利明,邱军利,夏燕青,等.常见黏土矿物扫描电镜微孔特征与甲烷吸附性[J].石油学报,2012,33(2):249-256.]
[15]Ji Liming,Ma Xiangxian,Xia Yanqing,et al.Relationship between methane adsorption capacity of clay mineral and micropore volume[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(2):141-152.[吉利明,马向贤,夏燕青,等.黏土矿物甲烷吸附性能与微孔容积关系[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(2):141-152.]
[16]Ji Liming,Qiu Junli,Zhang Tongwei et al.Experiments on methane adsorption of common clay minerals in shale[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geoscience,2012,37(5):1043-1050.[吉利明,邱军利,张同伟,等.泥页岩主要黏土矿物组分甲烷吸附实验[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2012,37(5):1043-1050.]
[17]Cao T T,Song Z G,Wang S B,et al.A comparatice study of the specific surface area and pore structure of different shales and their kerogens[J].Science China Earth Science,2015,58(4):510-522.
[18]Tian Hua,Zhang Shuichang,Liu Shaobo,et al.The dual influence of shale composition and pore size on adsorption gas storage mechanism of organic-rich shale[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27(3):494-502.[田华,张水昌,柳少波等.富有机质页岩成分与孔隙结构对吸附气赋存的控制作用[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27(3):494-502.]
[19]Huang Lei,Shen Wei.Characteristics and controlling factors of the formation of pores of a shale gas reservoir:A case study from Longmaxi Formation of the Upper Yangtze region,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2015,22(1):374-385.[黄磊,申维.页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及主控因素分析[J].地学前缘,2015,22(1):374-385.]
[20]Shi Miao,Yu Bingsong,Xue zhipeng,et al.Pore characteristics and significance of the Longmaxi Formation shale gas reservoirs in northwestern Guizhou,China[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):206-217.[史淼,于炳松,薛志鹏等.黔西北地区龙马溪组页岩储层孔隙特征及其储气意义[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):206-217.]
[21]Li Jinming,Yao Suping,Sun Chao,et al.Pore structure of organic-rich shales in the Lower Silurian Gaojiabian Formation fron Ningzhen area,Jiangsu Procince[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2016,22(1):159-170.[李晋宁,姚素平,孙超,等.宁镇地区下志留统高家边组富有机质页岩孔隙结构[J].高校地质学报.2016,22(1):159-170.]
[1] 龙胜祥, 刘娅昭, 许华明, 陈前, 程喆. 四川盆地中国石化探区天然气勘探开发领域与技术攻关方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1195-1203.
[2] 李腾飞, 田辉, 肖贤明, 程鹏, 王星, 伍耀文, 吴子瑾. 样品粒径对高过成熟度页岩低压气体吸附实验结果的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1271-1284.
[3] 陈璐, 胡志明, 熊伟, 端祥刚, 常进. 页岩气扩散实验与数学模型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1285-1293.
[4] 牛强, 张焕旭, 朱地, 徐志尧, 仰云峰, 丁安徐, 高和群, 张立生. 川东南五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气录井碳同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(9): 1294-1305.
[5] 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 王强, 魏富彬, 袁桃. 川东南丁山与焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集条件差异分析与思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8): 1041-1051.
[6] 罗胜元, 陈孝红, 岳勇, 李培军, 蔡全升, 杨睿之. 中扬子宜昌地区沉积—构造演化与寒武系页岩气富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8): 1052-1068.
[7] 刘世明, 唐书恒, 霍婷, 谭富荣, 刘达成, 王金喜. 柴达木盆地东缘上石炭统泥页岩孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(8): 1069-1081.
[8] 邵德勇, 张六六, 张亚军, 张瑜, 罗欢, 乔博, 闫建萍, 张同伟. 中上扬子地区下寒武统富有机质页岩吸水特征及对页岩气勘探的指示意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(7): 1004-1015.
[9] 席斌斌, 申宝剑, 蒋宏, 杨振恒, 王小林. 天然气藏中CH4—H2O—NaCl体系不混溶包裹体群捕获温压恢复及应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(7): 923-930.
[10] 戴金星, 董大忠, 倪云燕, 洪峰, 张素荣, 张延玲, 丁麟. 中国页岩气地质和地球化学研究的若干问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 745-760.
[11] 刘洪林, 王怀厂, 张辉, 赵伟波, 刘燕, 刘德勋, 周尚文. 四川盆地东部小河坝组沥青纳米孔隙网络及其成藏意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 818-826.
[12] 彭泽阳, 龙胜祥, 张永贵, 卢婷, 王濡岳. 适用于高温高压条件的等温吸附曲线方程[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 827-834.
[13] 康毅力, 李潮金, 游利军, 李家学, 张震, 王涛. 塔里木盆地深层致密砂岩气层应力敏感性[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(4): 532-541.
[14] 郑爱维, 梁榜, 舒志国, 张柏桥, 李继庆, 陆亚秋, 刘莉, 舒志恒. 基于大数据PLS法的页岩气产能影响因素分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(4): 542-551.
[15] 丁麟, 程峰, 于荣泽, 邵昭媛, 刘佳琪, 刘官贺. 北美地区页岩气水平井井距现状及发展趋势[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(4): 559-566.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵应成,周晓峰,王崇孝,王满福,郭娟娟 . 酒西盆地青西油田白垩系泥云岩裂缝油藏特征和裂缝形成的控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 12 -15 .
[2] 任以发. 微量烃分析在井中化探录井中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2005, 16(1): 88 -92 .
[3] 付广;杨勉;. 盖层发育特征及对油气成藏的作用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(3): 18 -24 .
[4] 张延敏, . 1996～1999年世界天然气产量[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(3): 44 -45 .
[5] 付广;王剑秦. 地壳抬升对油气藏保存条件的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(2): 18 -23 .
[6] . 西部天然气资源全面大开发在即[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2000, 11(1): 27 .
[7] 王先彬;妥进才;周世新;李振西;张铭杰;闫宏;. 论天然气形成机制与相关地球科学问题[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 7 -13 .
[8] 倪金龙;夏斌;. 济阳坳陷坡折带组合类型及石油地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(1): 64 -68 .
[9] Cramer B;Faber E;Gerling P;Krooss B M;刘全有（译）. 天然气稳定碳同位素反应动力学研究――关于干燥、开放热解实验中的思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2002, 13(5-6): 8 -18 .
[10] 荣宁,吴迪,韩易龙,陈文龙,王陶,张波,叶翔. 双台阶水平井在塔里木盆地超深超薄边际油藏开发中的应用及效果评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006, 17(2): 230 -232 .