天然气地球科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 993–1003.doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.02.008

• 天然气地质学 • 上一篇    下一篇

四川盆地西北部前陆盆地构造演化对古生界海相油气成藏的影响

李斌1,2(),梅文华1,2,李琪琪1,3,卓勤功4,鲁雪松4,郭强1   

  1. 1.西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院,四川  成都  610500
    2.油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川  成都  610500
    3.中国地质大学,湖北  武汉  430074
    4.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京  100083
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-10 修回日期:2020-02-27 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-07-02
  • 作者简介:李斌(1977-),男,新疆奎屯人,副教授,博士,主要从事油气成藏教学和科研工作.E-mail:lbin@swpu.edu.cn.
  • 基金资助:
    页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室基金(GSYKY-B09-33)

Influence of tectonic evolution of foreland basin in northwestern Sichuan Basin on Paleozoic marine hydrocarbon accumulation

Bin LI1,2(),Wen-hua MEI1,2,Qi-qi LI1,3,Qin-gong ZHUO4,Xue-song LU4,Qiang GUO1   

  1. 1.School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu 610500, China
    3.China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    4.PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2019-12-10 Revised:2020-02-27 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-07-02
  • Supported by:
    State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development Project(GSYKY-B09-33)

摘要:

针对四川盆地西北部古生界海相油气成藏的复杂性和平面分带性,研究梳理了古生界油气成藏特征,探讨了不同构造背景下油气聚集的差异化特征,揭示了前陆盆地构造演化对古生界海相油气成藏的影响。研究认为四川盆地西北部地区前陆盆地构造运动在纵向上促进了古生界烃源岩的热演化进入高成熟—过成熟阶段,在横向上对逆冲推覆带—坳陷带烃源岩热演化具有一定的延迟效应。前陆盆地构造深埋作用造成储层具有低孔低渗特征,挤压运动使储层孔隙度呈现逐渐降低的趋势。逆冲断裂破坏了前陆冲断带地区盖层的封盖能力,降低了圈闭的有效性,前缘隐伏带和坳陷带发育断块圈闭和构造—岩性圈闭,保存条件较好。综合分析认为逆冲推覆带受不整合面—断层疏导体系影响,古生界油气藏具有“早油晚气、后期调整、保存控藏”的特征,前缘隐伏带受渗透层—断层组合的阶梯状疏导体系控制,具有“多源充注、多期运聚、通源断裂控藏”成藏特征,而坳陷带主要受层间断裂垂向疏导体系控制,气藏具有“近源充注、持续供烃、层间断裂控藏”成藏特征。综合分析认为,前缘隐伏带是川西海相深层油气突破的有利地区。

关键词: 川西北部, 前陆盆地构造演化, 古生界, 海相油气, 成藏模式

Abstract:

Aim to the complexity and zonality of Paleozoic marine hydrocarbon accumulation caused by foreland basin tectonic in northwestern Sichuan Basin, the influence and differential characteristics of foreland basin tectonic evolution on Paleozoic marine hydrocarbon accumulation are analyzed from the perspective of reservoir forming conditions. It is supposed that the foreland basin structure in western Sichuan Basin longitudinally promoted the thermal evolution of the Paleozoic source rocks into the high-mature and over-mature stage. Laterally, there was a delay effect on the source rocks in the thrust belt and depression zone. The reservoir with characteristics of low porosity and permeability was caused by foreland basin squeezing action, and the porosity of the reservoir conforms to the compaction law. And the uplift destroyed the capping ability of the cover in the foreland thrust belt, reduced the effectiveness of traps, and fault block traps and tectonic-lithologic traps are developed in an area covering the front of thrust belt, and the preserve condition are well. The Paleozoic oil and gas accumulation in the study area has obvious zonation, in which the foreland thrust nappe belt affected by lateral migration system has the characteristics of late adjustment of early oil to gas, and reservoir controlled by preservation. The area in front of thrust belt is affected by stage migration system of permeable bed-fault, with characteristics of multi-source injection, multi-period migration and accumulation, and reservoir controlled by source faults. The depression zone is characterized by near source injection, continuous hydrocarbon supply, and reservoir controlled by vertical migration system of intraformational faults. The comprehensive analysis shows that the area in front of thrust belt is a favorable hydrocarbon accumulation area of Paleozoic marine formation.

Key words: Northwestern Sichuan Basin, Structure evolution of foreland basin, Paleozoic, Marine oil and gas, Accumulation model

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.1

图1

川西北部古生界井位分布"

图2

川西北部2010SH03地震测线深度剖面(位置见图1)①①西南石油气田分公司研究院.四川盆地下二叠统油气地质评价与勘探目标选择.内部报告,2015."

表1

川西北古生界烃源岩参数统计"

主要岩性厚度/mTOC/%RO/%(沥青等效反射率)有机质类型取样点
范围

平均值

(样品数)

范围

平均值

(样品数)

范围

平均值

(样品数)

P3d灰黑色硅质泥岩10~5537(8)0.18~8.102.08(8)1.49~2.121.75(6)1—Ⅱ2矿1井、河2井、长江沟、吴家1井、大两会、扁1井等
P3l(P3w生物灰岩、生屑灰岩、煤0~9054(12)0.25~6.721.92(9)1.52~2.171.73(10)1—Ⅱ2、Ⅲ矿1井、矿3井、金真村、老荒坡、剑丰、乌木沱、大两会、桥亭、朝天等
P2m生屑泥晶灰岩25~250138(12)0.07~2.580.85(21)1.10~3.372.00(22)Ⅰ—Ⅱ1通口、葛上岩、青杠坡、吴家1井、射1井、扁1井、矿3井等
P2q生屑泥晶灰岩30~7556(9)0.06~4.820.79(11)1.50~2.321.79(4)Ⅰ—Ⅱ1通口、双探3、龙17井、矿3井等
S1l黑色页岩、深灰色泥岩0~20050(3)0.09~2.330.91(5)1.49~2.371.82(3)Ⅰ—Ⅱ1南江桥亭、南江杨坝、川北等
1q黑色泥岩20~300163(7)0.60~6.202.81(9)1.40~3.322.13(7)朝天、火石岭、田坝等

图3

川西北地区单井热演化史和生排烃史模拟"

图4

川西北部古生界主要层位烃源岩生烃史"

表2

川西北地区栖霞组储层基本特征统计①"

构造带样本个数孔隙度/%渗透率/(10-3 μm2)储层岩石类型储集空间类型样本点

逆冲

推覆带

N=2540.13~16.512.260.0~7840.608粉细晶云岩,豹斑云质灰岩晶间孔,裂缝和溶洞矿2井,矿1井,天井山

前缘

隐伏带

N=2470.23~7.591.8250.0~94.25.14粉细晶针孔云岩裂缝—孔隙型双探3井
坳陷带N=1030.1~0.920.490.0~17.71.73泥—亮晶灰岩孔隙型龙17井,元坝3,吴家1井,龙4井

图5

川西北栖霞组白云岩储集层孔渗直方图"

表3

川西北地区古生界保存条件统计"

构造带盖层厚度地层水矿化度地层压力代表井
逆冲推覆带①龙潭组泥页岩厚度:36.1 m;②中下三叠统膏岩厚度:86.6 m① 茅口组,硫酸钠型,矿化度:23.558 g/L;②栖霞组,氯化钙型,矿化度:45.4 g/L;③志留系—奥陶系矿化度:32.325 g/L,水型:CaCl2①栖霞组地层压力系数0.86;②石炭系压力系数0.79矿3
前缘隐伏带①龙潭组泥页岩厚度:96 m;②中下三叠统膏岩厚度:310 m①茅口组水型:CaCl2,地层压力:82MPa;②栖霞组,氯化钙型,地层压力:73.5MPa。①茅口组压力系数:1.2;②栖霞组地层压力系数:1.02

双探1,

双探3

坳陷带①龙潭组泥页岩厚度:37 m;②中下三叠统膏岩厚度:270 m茅口组,重碳酸钠型,矿化度16.89 g/L地层压力系数1.36关基井,扁1,吴家1

图6

川西北古生界气藏成藏模式"

图7

川西北古生界烃源岩干酪根和乙烷碳同位素值对比(河湾场、吴家坝和矿山梁数据据黄东等[5],2011;其余数据据刘弈伶[28],2016)"

图8

川西北古生界不同构造带油气成藏条件配置示意"

图9

川西北部古生界油藏剖面示意(BB’剖面位置见图1)"

1 YANG Y, CHEN C, WEN L, et al. Characteristics of buried structures in northern Longmenshan mountains and its significance to oil and gas exploration in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2019,6(2):175-182.
2 蔚远江, 杨涛, 郭彬程, 等.前陆冲断带油气资源潜力、勘探领域分析与有利区带优选[J].中国石油勘探, 2019,24(1):46-59.
WEI Y J, YANG T, GUO B C, et al. Oil and gas resources potentials,exploration fields and favorable zones in foreland thrust belts[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019,24(1):46-59.
3 李延钧,赵圣贤,李跃纲,等.川西北地区九龙山气田天然气成因与来源探讨[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(4):755-767.
LI Y J, ZHAO S X, LI Y G, et al. Natural gas genesis and sources in Jiulongshan Gas Field, northwest Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(4):755-767.
4 王广利,王铁冠,韩克猷,等.川西北地区固体沥青和油砂的有机地球化学特征与成因[J].石油实验地质,2014,36(6):731-735.
WANG G L, WANG T G, HAN K Y, et al. Drganic geochemical characteristics and origin of oil sands in northwestern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2014,36 (6):731-735.
5 黄东,戴鑫,戴赟,等.川西北部河湾场气田天然气地球化学特征及其气源探讨[J].天然气工业,2011,31(3):37-40.
HUANG D, DAI X, DAI Y, et al. Geochemical behaviors and gas origins in the Hewanchang Gas Field, northern part of the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2011,31 (3):37-40.
6 黄第藩,王兰生.川西北矿山梁地区沥青脉地球化学特征及其意义[J].石油学报,2008, 29(1):23-28.
HUANG D F, WANG L S. Geochemical characteristics of bituminous dike in Kuangshanliang area of the northwestern Sichuan Basin and its significance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2008, 29(1):23-28.
7 GU Z, YIN J, JIANG H, et al. Tectonic evolution from Late Sinian to Early Paleozoic and natural gas exploration in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016,43(1):1-12.
8 CHEN Z H, BERND R T, SIMONEIT T G, et al. Biomarker signatures of Sinian bitumens in the Moxi-Gaoshiti Bulge of Sichuan Basin, China: Geological significance for paleo-oil reservoirs [J].Precambrian Research,2017, 296(4):1-19.
9 罗冰,周刚,罗文军,等.川中古隆起下古生界—震旦系勘探发现与天然气富集规律[J].中国石油勘探,2015,20(2):18-29.
LUO B, ZHOU G, LUO W J, et al. Discovery from exploration of Lower Paleozoic-Sinian Systerm in central Sichuan Palaeo-uplift and its natural gas abundance law[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2015, 20(2):18-29.
10 马行陟, 柳少波, 鲁雪松, 等. 四川盆地安岳地区寒武系龙王庙组古油藏分布研究[C].杭州:中国矿物岩石地球化学学会第17届学术年会, 2019.
MA X Z, LIU S B, LU X S, et al. Study on the distribution of Paleo-reservoirs of the Cambrian Longwangmiao Formation in Anyue Area, Sichuan Basin[C]. Hangzhou: The 17th Annual Conference of the Chinese Society of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2019.
11 梁霄,刘树根,莫倩雯,等.川西拗陷北段海相油气成藏特征及勘探前景[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2018,45(1):53-67.
LIANG X, LIU S G, MO Q W, et al. The characteristics of marine hydrocarbon accumulation and its exploration prospects in the northern section of western Sichuan Depression, China[J]. Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2018,45(1):53-67.
12 沈平, 张健,宋家荣,等.四川盆地中二叠统天然气勘探新突破的意义及有利勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2015,35(7):1-9.
SHEN P, ZHANG J, SONG J R, et al. Significance of new breakthrough in and favorable targets of gas exploration in the Middle Permian System,Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(7):1-9.
13 宋章强,王兴志,曾德铭.川西北二叠纪栖霞期沉积相及其与油气的关系[J].西南石油学院学报,2005,27(6):20-23,100.
SONG Z Q, WANG X Z, ZENG D M. Sedimentary facies of Qixia period of Permian in northwest Sichuan and their relationship with oil and gas[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute,2005,27(6):20-23, 100.
14 HE L J. Permian to Late Triassic evolution of the Longmen Shan Foreland Basin(Western Sichuan): Model results from both the lithospheric extension and flexure[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,93:49-59.
15 CHEN Z X, LI W, LIN L W, et al. Structural geology and favorable exploration prospect belts in northwestern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019,46(2):413-425.
16 GUAN S W, HE D F, LEI Y L, et al. Kinematic classification, structural modeling and prospective fields of the foreland thrust belts in Midwest China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(1): 69–83.
17 孙晓猛,许强伟,王英德,等.川西北龙门山冲断带北段油砂成藏特征及其主控因素[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2010,40(4):886-896.
SUN X M, XU Q W, WANG Y D, et al. Reservoir forming characteristics and main controlling factors of oil sandstones in the northern Longmen Mountain Thurst Zone of the northwest of Sichuan[J].Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2010,40(4):886-896.
18 杨长清,刘树根,曹波,等.龙门山造山带与川西前陆盆地耦合关系及其对油气成藏的控制[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2008,35(4):471-476.
YANG C Q, LIU S G, CAO B, et al. Coupling relationship between Longmenshan orogenic belt and Foreland Basin in western Sichuan and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation [J]. Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2008,35(4):471-476.
19 黄士鹏, 江青春, 汪泽成,等.四川盆地中二叠统栖霞组与茅口组烃源岩的差异性[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(12):26-34.
HUANG S P, JIANG Q C, WANG Z C, et al. Differences between the Middle Permian Qixia and Maokou source rocks in the Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2016, 36(12):26-34.
20 徐胜林,陈洪德,陈安清,等.四川盆地海相地层烃源岩特征[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2011, 41(2):343-350.
XU S L, CHEN H D, CHEN A Q, et al. Source rock characteristics of marine strata, Sichuan Basin [J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition,2011, 41(2):343-350.
21 刘春.米仓山—龙门山交汇带二叠系海相碳酸盐岩烃源岩特征研究及评价[D].成都:西南石油大学,2008.
LIU C. The Research and Evaluation of Source Rock Characteristic that the Permian Marine Facies Carbonate Rock Locate Micang-Longmen Mt. Rendezvous of Northwest Sichuan Basin [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University,2008.
22 蔡开平,王应蓉,杨跃明,等.川西北广旺地区二、三叠系烃源岩评价及气源初探[J].天然气工业,2003,23(2):10-14,12-11.
CAI K P, WANG Y R, YANG Y M, et al. Evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks in Permian and Triassic at Guangyuan-Wangcang region in Southwest Sichuan Basin and a primary discussion on gas source[J].Natural Gas Industry,2003,23(2):10-14,12-11.
23 肖开华.中国南方志留系油气地质特征与勘探方向[J].天然气工业,2009,29(11):1-4,133.
XIAO K H. Geological features and exploration direction of the Silurian hydrocarbon reservoirs in Southern China[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2009,29(11);1-9.
24 王晔, 邱楠生, 仰云峰, 等. 四川盆地五峰—龙马溪组页岩成熟度研究[J]. 地球科学, 2019,44(3):953-971.
WANG Y, QIU N S, YANG Y F, et al. Thermal maturity of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2019,44(3):953-971.
25 李琪琪,李斌,刘羿伶,等.川西北古生界烃源岩特征及生烃潜力评价[J].特种油气藏,2018,25(3):44-49.
LI Q Q, LI B, LIU Y L, et al. Paleozoic source-rock properties and hydrocarbon generation potential in northwest Sichuan[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs,2018,25(3):44-49.
26 祁凯, 任战利, 崔军平, 等. 银额盆地苏红图坳陷西部中生界烃源岩热演化史恢复[J]. 地球科学, 2018,43(6):1957-1971.
QI K, REN Z L, CUI J P, et al. Thermal history reconstruction of Mesozoic source rocks in Western of Suhongtu depression,Inner Mongolia,Northern China[J].Earth Science, 2018,43(6):1957-1971.
27 郑见超, 李斌, 刘羿伶, 等. 塔里木盆地下寒武统玉尔吐斯组烃源岩热演化模拟分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018,8(6):7-12.
ZHENG J C, LI B, LIU Y L, et al. Study on the thermal history of the source rock and its relationship with hydrocarbon accumulation based on the basin modeling technology:A case of the Yuertusi Formation of Tarim Basin[J], Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(5):39-49.
28 刘羿伶. 川西北部地区中二叠统茅口组天然气成藏研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2018:66.
LIU Y L. Study on Natural Gas Accumulation of Middle Permian Maokou Formation in Northwestern Sichuan[D].Cheng-du:Southwest Petroleum University,2018:66.
29 张文.川西—北地区中二叠统白云岩储层成因及控制因素[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014.
ZHANG W. The Dolostone Reservoirs from the Middle Permian in Northwestern Sichuan Basin: Genesis and Controlling Factors[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2014.
30 ZHANG Y, LUO B, CHEN C, et al. Genesis and characteristics of the dolomite reservoirs in Middle Devonian Guanwushan Formation, Northwest Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum, 2019.
31 程遥.川西北地区下二叠统栖霞组白云岩储层特征及储层成因机制[D].成都:西南石油大学,2015.
CHENG Y. Reservoir Characteristics and Genesis Mechanism of Dolomite in Lower Permian Qixia Formation in Northwest Sichuan[D].Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University,2015.
32 张本健, 王兴志, 王宇峰, 等. 川西北九龙山地区中二叠统储层裂缝特征及形成机制[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版, 2019,46(4):497-506.
ZHANG B J, WANG X Z, WANG Y F. Occurrence characteristics and formation mechanism of fractures in Middle Permian reservoirs in Jiulongshan area, Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition, 2019,46(4):497-506.
33 罗啸泉,李书兵,何秀彬,等.川西龙门山油气保存条件探讨[J].石油实验地质,2010,32(1):10-14.
LUO X Q, LI S B, HE X B, et al. Discussion on oil and gas preservation conditions in Longmen Mountain,Western Sichuan[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2010,32(1):10-14.
34 白晓亮, 杨跃明, 杨雨, 等. 川西北栖霞组优质白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2019,41(1):47-56.
BAI X L, YANG Y M, YANG Y, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of high-quality dolomite reservoirs in the Permian Qixia Formation, northwestern Sichuan[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2019,41(1):47-56.
35 WU L, LIAO Y, FANG Y, et al. The study on the source of the oil seeps and bitumens in the Tianjingshan structure of the northern Longmen Mountain structure of Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012,37(1):147-161.
36 SHEN H, WANG H, WEN L, et al. Natural gas exploration prospect in the Upper Paleozoic strata, NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2016,3(3):526-536.
37 周文,邓虎成,丘东洲,等.川西北天井山构造泥盆系古油藏的发现及意义[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2007,34(4):413-417.
ZHOU W, DENG H C, QIU D Z,et al. The discovery and significance of the Devonian paleo-reservoir in Tianjingshan structure of the northwest Sichuan,China[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science & Technology Edition,2007,34(4):413-417.
38 LI Y, CHEN S, WANG Y, et al. Relationships between hydrocarbon evolution and the geochemistry of solid bitumen in the Guanwushan Formation, NW Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020,111:116-134.
39 王杰,腾格尔,刘文汇,等.川西矿山梁下寒武统沥青脉油气生成时间的厘定—来自于固体沥青Re—Os同位素等时线年龄的证据[J].天然气地球科学,2016,27 (7) :1290-1298.
WANG J, TENGER, LIU W H, et al. Definition of petroleum generating time for Lower Cambrian bitumen of the Kuangshanliang in the west Sichuan Basin, China; Evidence from Re-Os isotpic isochron ago[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2016,27 (7):1290-1298.
40 WU L L, LIAO Y H, FANG Y X, et al. The study on the source of the oil seeps and bitumens in the Tianjingshan structure of the northern Longmen Mountain structure of Sichuan Basin, China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012,37:147-161.
41 戴鸿鸣,刘文龙,杨跃明,等.龙门山北段山前带侏罗系油砂岩成因[J].石油实验地质,2007,29(6):604-608.
DAI H M, LIU W L, YANG Y M, et al. The origin of Jurassicoil-soaked sandstone in the piedmont zone of north Longmenshan, the Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2007,29(6):604-608.
42 JIN X D, PAN C C, YU S, et al. Organic geochemistry of marine source rocks and pyrobitumen-containing reservoir rocks of the Sichuan Basin and neighbouring areas, SW China[J].Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014,56:147-165.
[1] 易士威, 李明鹏, 徐淑娟, 崔宝文, 蒙启安, 武雪琼, 程宏岗. 松辽盆地双城断陷结构特征及控藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(6): 761-772.
[2] 张殿伟, 何治亮, 李甘璐. 四川盆地奥陶系油气地球化学特征及成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(3): 428-435.
[3] 刘晓鹏, 赵会涛, 闫小雄, 贾亚妮, . 克拉通盆地致密气成藏地质特征与勘探目标优选——以鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(3): 331-343.
[4] 葛岩,朱光辉,万欢,潘新志,黄志龙. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘紫金山侵入构造对上古生界致密砂岩气藏形成和分布的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 491-499.
[5] 邢 舟,曹高社,毕景豪,周新桂,张交东. 南华北盆地禹州地区ZK0606钻孔上古生界煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4): 518-528.
[6] 石新朴, 覃建强, 丁艳雪, 杨丹, 史全党, 胡清雄, 李波, 齐洪岩, 张吉辉, 孙德强, 赵振, 饶远, 习成威. 准噶尔盆地滴南凸起火山岩气藏成藏主控因素与成藏模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(12): 1706-1714.
[7] 王延山, 胡英杰, 黄双泉, 康武江, 陈永成. 渤海湾盆地辽河坳陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1422-1432.
[8] 钟雪梅, 王建, 李向阳, 王权, 董雄英, 马学峰, 张国伟. 渤海湾盆地冀中坳陷天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1433-1442.
[9] 姚泾利, 胡新友, 范立勇, 刘新社, 季海锟, . 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1465-1474.
[10] 杨海波, 王屿涛, 郭建辰, 何文军, 蓝文芳. 准噶尔盆地天然气地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(10): 1518-1530.
[11] 沈安江,付小东,张友,郑兴平,刘伟,邵冠铭,曹彦清. 塔里木盆地塔东地区震旦系—下古生界碳酸盐岩油气生储条件与勘探领域[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1): 1-16.
[12] 包建平,何丹,朱翠山,刘玉瑞,王文军,刘宏宇. 北部湾盆地迈陈凹陷徐闻X3井原油地球化学特征及其成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 665-676.
[13] 梁金强,付少英,陈芳,苏丕波,尚久靖,陆红锋,方允鑫. 南海东北部陆坡海底甲烷渗漏及水合物成藏特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(5): 761-770.
[14] 陈杰,张剑,方杰. 阿联酋二叠系Khuff组气藏成藏模式与成藏过程分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4): 521-528.
[15] 韩旭,田继军,冯烁,张雨瑶 . 准南煤田玛纳斯矿区向斜—承压式煤层气富集模式[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(12): 1891-1897.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张荣虎;张惠良;马玉杰;沈扬;李昌;张丽娟 . 特低孔特低渗高产储层成因机制—以库车坳陷大北1气田巴什基奇克组储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2008, 19(1): 75 -82 .
[2] 康晓东, 李相方, 程时清, 郝伟, 刘广华. 裂缝性有水凝析气藏开发开采中的若干问题――以千米桥潜山凝析气藏为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2004, 15(5): 536 -539 .
[3] 江厚顺,白彦华,冉建立 . 水平井产能预测及射孔参数优选系统研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(6): 891 -893 .
[4] 郭振华, 赵彦超. 大牛地气田盒2段致密砂岩气层测井评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(1): 87 -94 .
[5] 宋琦, 王树立, 陈燕, 郑志, 谢磊. 天然气水合物新型动力学模型与实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(5): 868 -874 .
[6] 赵雪凤, 朱光有, 刘钦甫,张水昌 . 深部海相碳酸盐岩储层孔隙发育的主控因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2007, 18(4): 514 -521 .
[7] 游利军,李雷,康毅力,石玉江,张海涛,杨小明. 考虑有效应力与含水饱和度的致密砂岩气层供气能力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4): 764 -769 .
[8] 王茹,李江海,徐兴友,王秀红,李钜源,刘庆. 东营凹陷古近系红层油气来源及勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(6): 989 -995 .
[9] 胡林楠,赵靖舟. 致密砂岩气藏有效厚度确定方法及应用探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1): 69 -77 .
[10] 韩中喜,李剑,严启团,垢艳侠,王淑英,葛守国,王春怡. 天然气汞含量作为煤型气和油型气判识指标的探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 0, (): 129 -133 .